Sylvia Browne

That Long Island Medium scam artists. My mom loves her, she has never been able to fully deal with the death of her father (my grandpa) it's despicable how these people prey on the grieving.

also was the victim of a local medium after the death of her daughter (my sister in law). I feel very strongly about this type of scam and the victimization of grieving people.

Browne was a fake, but her history is a bit mixed in that she did give a lot of comfort to people who wanted to believe she was contacting people who were known to be dead.

But don't worry, there will be another one to take her place soon enough.

Bullshitting people about their dead relatives while taking their money is not mixed, it is a scam pure and simple.
She was a charlatan and a fraud who bilked people. No redeeming value.
And telling people their missing children are dead (with no real knowledge of the situation ) is beyond reprehensible. (especially when they turned out to be alive)
Good riddance.

and of course she took money to make people feel better by telling them comfy lies about their dead family members. She was probably cheaper than prolonged therapy.

That's what I mean by mixed.

Most of her money came from her books, not fleecing the grieving.

She was no worse than a lot of men with backward collars.

thanks.

And there was one instance where telling someone their child was dead led to that person's death, so no, not harmless.

And you can find pleanty on her through Google. Found this tidbit on her wiki page:

In 1992, Browne and her then-husband Kenzil Dalzell Brown were indicted on several charges of investment fraud and grand theft. The Superior Court of Santa Clara County, California, found Browne and her husband had sold securities in a gold-mining venture under false pretenses.[44] In at least one instance, they told a couple that their $20,000 investment was to be used for immediate operating costs.[45] Instead, the money was transferred to an account for their Nirvana Foundation for Psychic Research.[44] Browne pleaded no contest to securities fraud and was indicted on grand larceny in Santa Clara County, California on May 26, 1992.[46] The couple each received one year probation. In addition, Browne was sentenced to 200 hours of community service.[44]

So, an actual convicted fraud.

explained downthread.

has a link to the episode. The family maintains that because of Browne's words the girl's mom gave up on life, which led to her rapid decline in health. Read the link, it's pretty sad.

Sylvia finally managed to dodge the JREF million dollar challenge, which she said she would do way back on 3 Sept 2001 on the Larry King Program.

Of course she saw that was going to happen because she knew she was a fraud (just like all proclaimed psychics are) but Sylvia was a particularly insidious and despicable one.

She's dead? Best thing that ever happened to her.

She was just 11 years out.

And especially let us not forget all the families she harmed by her false prophecies ...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2324733/Cleveland-kidnappings-Psychic-Sylvia-Browne-explains-wrongly-telling-Amanda-Berrys-mother-missing-daughter-dead.html

Browne exploited and abused emotionally susceptible people, and the privilege that religious beliefs enjoy helped contribute to her success.

I could not stand Sylvia Browne. For some reason, she always seemed to be a collosal fake, to me. But she did say that Amanda's mother would only see her daughter again on the other side. I guess that much was true.

are charlatans. I don't celebrate her death, but I'm not sorry that she won't be able to hurt families with her false information anymore.

May those hurt by her find peace.

to think that Sylvia Browne was practicing a form of religion, or that people interested in various religions would perhaps be interested in Sylvia Browne

I myself had never heard of Browne, and so far as I can tell from a quick websearch, Browne wasn't following any standard religion -- but then I'm not much inclined to pay any attention to people who make their livings through "psychic ability," being strongly prejudiced against such claims as probable nonsense. And most religions, that I've ever thought about seriously, don't actually seem much interested in anyone's alleged "psychic ability." Certainly there is a very long Christian tradition (which I expect follows an even older Jewish tradition) that frowns heavily on activities such as consulting soothsayers or astrologers

We all die, of course. Browne never having crossed my field of vision, and being now dead, I don't feel competent to express more opinions about her particular case

I mean, she only founded her own church.

Novus Spiritus

Google is your friend.

[link:http://www.novus.org/home/index.cfm|NEW ADDRESS FOR THE OFFICES:
Sylvia Browne Corporation
Sylvia Browne Enterprises
Society of Novus Spiritus
125 E Sunnyoaks Ave Ste 214
Campbell CA 95008]

So you contact the "church" by contacting her corporation

... She .. ran a .. successful company the Sylvia Browne Corporation, and Sylvia Browne Enterprises earning over $3 million a year from the company ventures. In 1974 the psychic began giving public readings talking with thousands fans during one-on-one chats charging about an $850 for a 20– to 30-minute telephone session ...

The opportunities linked on the "church" website are also interesting:

A psychic reading with Sylvia is very much like meeting a long lost friend ... Sylvia Spiritual Salons are small groups of people (35 - 45 people) who will enjoy intimate conversations with Sylvia on many topics ... ... Salon Fee — $1000 per person ...

... Now Sylvia Browne's Master Hypnotists will train YOU to use her time proven hypnosis techniques ... Registration Fee: $2,000 ...

... For a One on One Hypnosis/Past Life Regression session please download the required forms, fill in the required information and sign where indicated ... In office Behavioral Modification Hypnosis - $250. In office Past Life Regression - $250. Out of Office Hypnosis or Regression varies city to city depending on travel expenses. The estimated cost for most cities is $350 ...

You can shop for Sylvia Browne's books, audios, videos and her newsletter on her web site. To shop for all things Sylvia click here! ...

Novus Spiritus is offering personal development classes ... For more details of each class follow (click on) a link below ... CLASS CANCELLATION POLICY. Please consider this carefully before signing up ... You may cancel with 35 days or more notice with no penalty and your 50% deposit will be refunded. After 35 days and within 15 days, you will be liable for the 50% deposit ... 14 days prior to the class, your card will be charged for the balance of the class tuition, and there will be no refunds for anyone who cancels or does not attend the class ...

The "church" sure looks like a conduit to her products and "services"

You're killin me, smalls.

links to many of Brown's profit-making ventures: the Spiritual Salon with Sylvia Brown is linked from the "church" website, and a "church" webpage instructs:

... To use your Credit Card (Visa, MC,Amex or Discover) call (408) 379-7070 or send a Money Order or cashiers check, payable to "Sylvia Browne" (no cash or personal checks) to: Salon - Sylvia Browne 6000 Hellyer Ave ...

That's an example of the "church" used as a conduit to her products and "services" and I provided others upthread

makes it an invalid or non-standard "church"? (With quotes?)

Just askin.

and non-believers who frequent this group about what groups are either not really religions and are better described as cults or scams. Not unanimous by any means, but I've never seen a scientologist post in this group or anyone support scientology as a religion. I also haven't seen any fans of Sylvia Browne or anyone who thinks she really represents a religion.

That doesn't mean we don't talk about those things, but most people seem to be in agreement about what they really are.

Attempts to conflate these kinds of groups/people with what most people consider standard religions is telling, imo.

Of course, there are grey areas, like Mormonism, but this person doesn't appear to be in a grey area at all.

I'm failing to see the relevance of this. It was claimed this topic was inappropriate for the religion forum. As Sylvia Browne's schtick was steeped in religious jargon, it is my position the topic is relevant. No one is arguing whether her religion is more or less valid than "standard" religions (which, might I add, is probably one of the most ridiculously egocentric and hypocritical things I've read here thus far), or that her religion wasn't a cult or a scam. It certainly was, but unless you mean to tell me religious cults or religious scams aren't appropriate topics for debate here, I don't see what it is you're trying to get at.

What I see is a discussion on whether this woman's "church" is really a religious organization. I agree with s4p that it is not, even if she calls it one.

It's a relevant discussion for this group, imo.

You viciously protest whenever someone else tries to label you or your beliefs, yet you show no hesitation whatsoever in labeling others and/or their beliefs.

Pathetic.

In #23, I wrote I've expressed my view and have provided supporting links to which you responded Does this mean we aren't allowed to talk about Scientology either?

I have certainly been known to misunderstand other people's posts, but here there seems to me an obvious disconnect

So much for turning the other cheek.

Yes, you stated your opinion. If I understand it correctly (you indicate in your previous post you think I do not, so please feel free to clarify anytime you so choose), was that Sylvia Browne was not practicing religion--or at least not some ill-defined "standard" religion, as you claim--a conclusion based on the premise Browne manufactured the church to make a profit.

Dually noted.

But why bring this up? Going on previous interactions with you--which is the only reference by which to frame your character--I can only assume you intended to refute the culpability of religion in Browne's myriad scams, to claim, as you always do, that this is just one bad apple in the bunch (not a particularly popular one at that, like the crabapple of religions...), and, of course, to imply the OP is a bigot for bringing it up in the first place.

Now, onto this gem:



Your argument is as such:

1. Religions seemingly established purely to profit their founders are not real religions.

2. Sylvia Browne's church seems to have been established to profit Sylvia Browne.

Ergo:

3. Sylvia Browne's church is not a real church with a real religion.



Your "supporting links" support premise 2, and only premise 2.

We're disputing premise 1 and your conclusion.

And I'm the one who needs a course in reading comprehension? Heh, stay classy.

not being always a platonist, I do not regard abstract terms like "religion" as automatically designating some definite and well-defined objects, and so IMO it can be entirely pointless to debate what does or does not constitute a religion

I can, however, say that I myself do not use the word religion to describe a venture extracting profits for the organization's founder -- I'm rather more inclined to call such a venture a business

If you use the word differently, then we are unlikely to resolve questions about the correctness or incorrectness of certain sentences, though it is still possible that each of us might understand what the other says, by taking the time to understand how each chooses to use certain words

Despite your history of indicating you want anything but, I am attempting once again to have a discussion with you.

Please state clearly what it is you are attempting to say.

I'm making an honest effort to engage in dialog - will you join me?

As far as her not following a "standard" religion (whatever the heck you think that means - I'm sure someone would call YOUR religion non-standard, too), here's some info from her religion's webpage, the link to which was given above:





Doesn't seem that her church's basic beliefs are all that different than what you probably consider within the realm of "standard" religion. Who are you to judge, anyway?

... in 1974 .. Sylvia incorporated The Nirvana Foundation for Psychic Research, a nonprofit organization (now known as Society of Novus Spiritus) ... To further her goals, Sylvia formed another organization in 1986, Society of Novus Spiritus .. based upon a Christian Gnostic theology... She is training ministers to actively help spread her philosophy. Her goals are to prove that the soul survives death ... P.S. Sylvia does not endorse any "psychic hot lines" ... Any claim to the contrary is a fraudulent misuse of Sylvia's name

The final warning not to be fooled by frauds is a nice touch

Overall such texts seem to me evidence merely of marketing decisions. Despite the name, I doubt the Nirvana Foundation had much to do with Buddhist teachings, though babble incorporating some Buddhist language was popular in the 1970s. And babble referencing the Gnostics similarly was popular in the 1980s.

"Gnostic" is a vague catch-all term. It may describe: second century persons who followed traditional Judaic law and regarded Jesus of Nazareth as the Messiah but denied his divinity; dualists who believed in two supreme divinities, one good and one evil, locked in eternal struggle, Jesus of Nazareth being the son of the good one; a movement that accepted various of Paul's epistles but only Luke's gospel; followers of Philumena's supposed revelations from some angel; a second century sect that held, apparently from a reference to Jesus of Nazareth as alpha and omega, that all truth could be inferred from the Greek alphabet; a group that erected an elaborate cosmology from a Deuteronomic reference to G-d as a devouring fire; and any of a number of other movements

So I'd guess the name change from Nirvana Foundation to the "Christian Gnostic" Novus Spiritus was driven by a desire to appeal to a wider demographic

I don't see any reason to change the view I expressed in #18 that the "church" is a conduit to her products and "services"

We could analyze every church website and easily find inconsistent claims.

You reject rational analysis when it comes to your religion, so why do you insist on applying it to someone else's?

than "S. Acharya" or Kenneth Whatsis that runs the jesusneverexisted site.

And they'll be happy to take your money, too.

outside a typical "donate" button and a couple of books I saw no overt money grab as with Browne.

Seems more like someone just putting forth his view point (one I am not advocating either way) than the pure unadulterated money grubbing scam artist that Browne was.

Never stopped them from posting falsehoods before, why would anything change?

https://www.paypal.com/uk/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_flow&SESSION=ZIftEkpWGuFT6W55BhUzqzwfuZ12qT2FZjUqa676r5V5xBOwZOOKPFt_F0G&dispatch=5885d80a13c0db1f8e263663d3faee8def8934b92a630e40b7fef61ab7e9fe63

They accept recurring donations.

typical "donate' button that I see on many websites, including DU. But not the overt thievery Browne had.
There is more commerce on Catholic.org than jesusneverexisted.
I would not compare either to Browne's and questioned why the poster lumped them together when it seems they aren't similar at all.

That the sites don't compare. Most sites have ads, but Browne's "church" site was just one more way for her to bilk her marks.
Whatever the merits of his arguments, jne seems to be a sincere site to espouse his POV. Not a money grab as the poster implied.

for others who have/had respect for the dead. Sylvia had no respect for the dead or the living.
My guess is one of her fraud kids is gonna start saying Sylvia speaks through him now or some other bullshit..

She has elected me to carry her message forward. Have a blessed Thanksgiving.

She understands your skepticism and says that all will be clear.

Blessings.

[link:https://www.facebook.com/sylvia.lives.9|

Did she foresee her passing and declare you her successor prior to death? Or did she conveniently (for you) only declare this to you in a vision?

I wish you nothing but miserable failure in your attempt to take money from vulnerable people.