Religion
Related: About this forumDarren Aronofsky's Noah faces ban in Muslim countries
Source: The Guardian
Ben Child
theguardian.com, Friday 7 March 2014 11.22 GMT
Darren Aronofksy's Noah could be banned across large swaths of the Middle East and parts of north Africa for contravening Islamic rules on the depiction of prophets, according to the Hollywood Reporter.
The fantasy epic, which stars Russell Crowe as the biblical patriarch, has already been refused a licence by censors in Qatar, Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates. Egypt could well follow suit, with Jordan and Kuwait also expected to outlaw the film on religious grounds.
"Al-Azhar renews its rejection to (sic) the screening of any production that characterises Allah's prophets and messengers and the companions of the Prophet (Muhammad)," said one of Egypt's leading Sunni Muslim institutes in a statement. "Therefore, al-Azhar announces the prohibition of the upcoming film about Allah's messenger Noah peace be upon him." The institute, which is influential but does not have the final say on censorship, added that the movie "contradicts the stature of prophets and messengers ... and antagonises the faithful".
Noah is currently due to open in Egypt on 26 March, two days ahead of its US debut. The film has already caused controversy amid reports that US fundamentalist Christian groups were dismayed at Aronofksy's decision to produce a loose adaptation of the Bible story rather than a literal retelling. Studio Paramount, which is desperate to court religious filmgoers, last week issued a statement making clear that the movie is not intended as a direct translation.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/film/2014/mar/07/darren-aronofsky-noah-banned-muslim-countries
longship
(40,416 posts)...that those opposing these religious films are religious people? Apparently, the Christian Right does not like Noah either.
That invites the question, "Who's going to want to see it?" Well, I suppose there's always the Russell Crowe fans.
Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)Darren Aronofsky is a great film maker, he is making a fictional movie and he knows it is a work of fiction and does not try to pretend otherwise. As long as people go in looking at the movie as a work of art rather than a documentary I think it will be liked by a broad spectrum of people.
longship
(40,416 posts)Who don't like being told that the Biblical stories are fiction.
But, although I have no desire to see the flick, I can understand why some would want to. My lack of interest has nothing to do with my atheism.
Maybe you can post a review. That would be cool.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)now I kinda want to see it, perhaps on dvd...
cbayer
(146,218 posts)It's a great story whether you are a believer or not.
And it's a story that many children grew up with, to say nothing of the famous Bill Cosby skit.
I am also a Russell Crowe fan.
longship
(40,416 posts)I have no problem with people wanting to see it, and I did not intend to malign the film. I merely wanted to comment that some religious are going to boycott it (or try to ban it). I found that fact amusing.
Of course, Hollywood does not know how to stick to the storyline of the source material. They never have and never will. These days they need more explosions -- apparently.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)I think the banning of this film is ridiculous, but then again I find many of the rules imposed in theocracies to be ridiculous (or worse).
The film will do fine, imo.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)skepticscott
(13,029 posts)Do these countries and these religions have the right to impose these restrictions? Are there reasons for doing so any more ridiculous than your reasons for some of the things you claim to believe in?
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)that brain-dead fundies are mad because the movie isn't a "literal retelling" of the flood story. News for you folks.. There are TWO fucking flood stories in Genesis, and they're NOT the same! What did you want, a split screen where Noah takes on one pair of every animal on one side, and seven pairs of the clean and two of the unclean on the other? Etc., etc.
Truly amazing that someone can be a "Biblical literalist" and know fuck-all about the actual text.