Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 04:04 PM Mar 2014

Neil deGrasse Tyson on Why He Doesn't Call Himself an Atheist

Rationally Speaking

Posted: Mar 10, 2014

Published March 9, 2014, Astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson returns for this episode of Rationally Speaking, with a particular question to discuss: Should he call himself an atheist? The impetus is a recent dust-up over Neil's appearance on Big Think, in which he explained that he avoids the label "atheist" because it causes people to make all sorts of unflattering (and often untrue) assumptions. Julia Galef and IEET contributor, Massimo Pigliucci, reply with some counterarguments, and along the way delve into the philosophy of language.

http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/more/pigliucci20140310

52:54 audio at link.

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Neil deGrasse Tyson on Why He Doesn't Call Himself an Atheist (Original Post) rug Mar 2014 OP
Massimo Pigliucci is a very, very smart guy. longship Mar 2014 #1
I've only got about ten minutes into it. rug Mar 2014 #2
But he IS an atheist... Ron Obvious Mar 2014 #3
Don't you think that's for him to determine? rug Mar 2014 #5
Maybe Ron Obvious Mar 2014 #7
You just defined deism not atheism. rug Mar 2014 #8
OK, lump me in with Jefferson and Mark Twain then. Ron Obvious Mar 2014 #9
"Labels are intellectually lazy" - Tyson - may not be an exact quote. Jim__ Mar 2014 #4
+1 rug Mar 2014 #6

longship

(40,416 posts)
1. Massimo Pigliucci is a very, very smart guy.
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 04:14 PM
Mar 2014

He's steeped very deeply into philosophy. I like him, but he really gets deep sometimes.

I will listen to this one, but I am not a regular listener as I am not a big fan of philosophical discussions at Massimo's level.

The argument over labels is a bit silly. I call myself an atheist. Neil deGrasse Tyson does not. In the end it does not matter what one calls oneself. What matters is how you act. And that goes to those who call themselves by other labels, like Christian, etc.

I'll listen to it this evening.

Thanks, rug.

R&K

 

Ron Obvious

(6,261 posts)
7. Maybe
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 07:10 PM
Mar 2014

But as far as I'm concerned, an atheist is a fully conscious adult who rejects the notion of a supreme being that governs us.

That's him. That's me. That's both of us. Own it, Neil.

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
8. You just defined deism not atheism.
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 07:14 PM
Mar 2014

It's actually simpler than that. It's only nonbelief in any deity, regardless of governing.

 

Ron Obvious

(6,261 posts)
9. OK, lump me in with Jefferson and Mark Twain then.
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 07:31 PM
Mar 2014

I'm not too hung up on labels.

Governing, schmongering. I'll be proud of the company.

Jim__

(14,074 posts)
4. "Labels are intellectually lazy" - Tyson - may not be an exact quote.
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 05:28 PM
Mar 2014

But, I do tend to agree with that. People and their thoughts and beliefs are complex. Labels are a shorthand version of describing someone, but don't really get at the truth.

He made an excellent point at the beginning of the audio. He wished an astronaut friend of his, "Godspeed," before the astronaut went on a mission and people gave him shit about it. They had put a label on him and he wasn't living up to the label. Who needs the grief from the thought police?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Neil deGrasse Tyson on Wh...