Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Tue May 6, 2014, 10:13 AM May 2014

Vatican Goes After U.S. Nuns and Women

On Monday, the National Catholic Reporter reported that the Vatican rebuked the largest umbrella organization for U.S. nuns for planning to honor Sister Elizabeth Johnson, a theologian whose work has been criticized by U.S. bishops for containing “misrepresentations” and doctrinal errors. The Leadership Conference of Women Religious (LCWR) was sharply criticized by the Vatican’s orthodoxy watchdog, Cardinal Gerhard Mueller, in a speech that was made public on Monday. He said that after this disagreement, all LCWR honorees must be pre-approved by the Vatican, a reform first proposed under Pope Benedict XVI after an investigation concluded that U.S. nuns were promoting “radical feminist themes incompatible with the Catholic faith.” The LCWR would only comment that Mueller’s staff was “respectful and engaging.”

Read it at National Catholic Reporter

###

http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2014/05/06/vatican-goes-after-u-s-nuns-and-women.html

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
2. The LCWR is already pissed and I don't think this is going to help.
Tue May 6, 2014, 10:23 AM
May 2014

Interesting that they are keeping silent on this, but I would love to be in the room where the leadership is discussing it.

Brettongarcia

(2,262 posts)
3. Readers should click on the original post, on the link. But a question on DU procedure here.
Tue May 6, 2014, 10:42 AM
May 2014

Is it usual procedure for DU to leave the 2nd posting on the board; and ironically allow the original to be presented, accessed, only by way of a link in the 2nd posting?

This seems to rather penalize and obscure the 1st posting.

Shouldn't this 2nd posting just be removed?

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
4. An article that discusses a news item and links to it is perfectly acceptable.
Tue May 6, 2014, 11:20 AM
May 2014

The only rules concerning this here are that original articles should be correctly cited and should include no more than four paragraphs from the original source.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Vatican Goes After U.S. N...