Religion
Related: About this forumAnother One Bites the Dust
Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone has decided to close St. Rita School in Fairfax at the end of this school year because of financial problems.
The news comes two years after school parents and parishioners of St. Rita Church mounted a furious campaign to preserve the Catholic school from a previously planned closure.
The response of the parishioners was one of anger, disappointment, and frustration, Weare said. The parishioners who are older are especially angry because some of them were here helping to build the school 57 years ago; others went to the school, graduated, got married, had children and those children went to our school so the school is a very central part of our parish community.
Full story here:
http://www.marinij.com/social-affairs/20150303/archbishop-orders-fairfaxs-st-rita-school-to-close
-
I hope I live long enough to see the closing of my old school.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Instead of teaching subjects such as science, math and history separately, all of the subjects are woven thematically, Black said. Those different themes have a strong environmental component, a strong cultural component and a strong international component. It enhances critical thinking and problem solving.
In addition, the schools middle school teachers began adding a new project-based learning component to their classes that emphasizes science, technology, engineering and math.
Black said those curriculum changes are a good way to differentiate ourselves from other Catholic schools and other private and public schools as well.
I hope the students will have options that aren't depressingly bad.
okasha
(11,573 posts)that Cordileone is the next right-wing American prelate slated for a rock in the middle of nowhere. St. Rita's sounds like just the sort of school he'd want to shut down.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)SAN FRANCISCO (CBS SF) More than 350 teachers in high schools administrated by the Catholic Archdiocese of San Francisco signed a letter urging Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone to drop proposed morality clauses from the teacher handbook.
According to organizers, 80 percent of the faculty and staff at the affected schools signed the letter. Organizers said they received signatures from 126 teachers and staff from Sacred Heart Cathedral Prep, 87 from Serra High School in San Mateo, 74 at Archbishop Riordan and 68 at Marin Catholic.
In the letter, the teachers said, We believe the recently proposed handbook language is harmful to our community and creates an atmosphere of mistrust and fear. We believe our schools should be places of inquiry and the free exchange of ideas where all feel welcome and affirmed.
This language in this judgmental context undermines the mission of Catholic education and the inclusive, diverse and welcoming community we prize at our schools, said Sacred Heart Cathedral teacher Jim Jordan, who helped organize the campaign.
http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2015/03/03/catholic-school-teachers-archdiocese-san-francisco-archbishop-salvatore-cordileone-morality-clauses-abortion-contraception-same-sex-marriage/
cbayer
(146,218 posts)by those who don't have any knowledge about this school other than it is catholic.
Supporting parent choice is not anti-public school and there are lots of excellent parochial schools in this country.
But its catholic!!!! It has to be very, very bad!!!!!
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)That's what it's all about. Take a look at who is supporting the voucher movement and get back to me.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Put yourself in their shoes Warren.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)might take offense at the OP's opinion of catholic schools, you took it upon yourself to admonish the op for expressing that opinion.
Should all opinions that somebody on the planet might find offensive also be suppressed on DU?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,295 posts)I'm glad you can see it now.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,295 posts)#19 was sarcasm, because it was already obvious to everyone that #4 was tone policing, and you didn't think it needed anyone to point it out?
#4 was sarcasm, because you actually feel the 'glee' too?
Something else?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Warren and I are just having another moment. No big deal.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)Still waiting for an answer.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)My post was said sarcasticly.
Does that meet eith your satisfaction?
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)"Try to contain your glee."
Sarcasm:
The use of words that mean the opposite of what you really want to say especially in order to insult someone, to show irritation, or to be funny
So what your really meant was "Please express more glee"?
I agree that nobody is being successful in suppressing anything, and I of course agree that you were tone trolling. But that wasn't my question up above, the one you still aren't answering.
Be honest Justin, you attempted to scold the OP for expressing what you perceived to be "glee" at the closing of a religious school. You further indicated that you felt the "glee" expressed was inappropriate because it could hurt the feelings of some people reading the message. Fine. That is your opinion and you are welcome to it. Now, do you also apply the same standard to all other opinions expressed here on DU? That they should not be expressed here if they could hurt anyone on the planet's feelings?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Don't be confused and just accept I said it sarcasticly.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)I tried to help you Justin with the definition of sarcastic, but it seems that you still think it just means "nasty".
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)i would ask.
Cheers Warren!
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)I understand that you have a thing about me. That wasn't the question. Just in case you've forgotten:
Do you disapprove of the expression of all opinions that might upset anyone who could possibly read DU?
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)You're supposed to have forgotten about that by now.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Warren I assure you I don't go looking for you, but you come looking for me.
I am not the one banned from safe havens.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)Just in case you've forgotten:
Do you disapprove of the expression of all opinions that might upset anyone who could possibly read DU?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)I don't disapprove of different opinions here.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Thry don't need my approval.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)and you responded:
Because people's hearts are broken. Put yourself in their shoes Warren.
That response was bullshit?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)okasha
(11,573 posts)Do you boil it or fry it or stew it up with rutabaga?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)okasha
(11,573 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)okasha
(11,573 posts)Cartoonist
(7,314 posts)Unless their parents are willing to pony up the money to send them to another parish, they will have to attend a public school. No more daily indoctrinization of myths and superstitions. They will meet other kids of other faiths, maybe even an atheist. They will be exposed to new ways of thinking. As for those whose feelings are hurt because they will no longer be able to control their children's minds, a pox on them.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Cartoonist
(7,314 posts)While I acknowledge that things have changed, a z Catholic school is more than just a classroom with a crucifix on the wall. Just the removal of that symbol alone is a major victory for freedom of thought. I couldn't be happier for these kids and my country.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)truebrit71
(20,805 posts)...and yes, a crucifix prevents that...
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)Does these symbols alone stop freedom of thought?
Of course they don't.
Symbols can be used to intimidate, marginalize, dictate certain ways of speaking or thinking, but they are just symbols.
As I noted, my son went to a catholic school. He's an atheist. There were crosses in the classrooms. He freedom of thought was not restricted or prevented.
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)For an impressionable child the ever-present reminder of a horrific and violent death absolutely stifles freedom of thought...
The message is quite clear...
Not that you are being deliberately disingenuous or anything....
cbayer
(146,218 posts)In fact, the swastika has a history that pre-dates it's use by the nazis and has been a very positive symbol in some cultures.
For many people, the crucifix is a symbol of something very positive. You can not extend your experience of that symbol on to anyone else.
If you can show me data that supports your position that the crucifix stifles freedom of thought, I would be glad to look at it.
Without that, it is simply your opinion, unsupported by evidence and based on faith.
When you resort to personal insults, you have surrendered. I accept your capitulation.
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)...to a 6 or 7 year-old is so freeing....so inspiring to free thoughts rather than obeying the doctrinal commands of those in power over you at the school to do as you are told because the nailed dead guy suffered for YOUR sins....so freeing...
I see that you have surrendered logic and decided to stick with being disingenuous. I accept your capitulation.
Oh, and I think it's more than a little rich for you to use the phrase "unsupported by evidence" in the very same thread where you have been shown to have done the very same thing...
cbayer
(146,218 posts)extended to anyone else. There are likely people who share your feelings, but it's not true for everyone. I was raised in the church and my experience is distinctly different than yours. I was raised in a tradition of free thought where questions were encouraged and expected.
More personal insults?
I misread an article and made a misstatement. I researched further, saw that I was mistaken and withdrew the statement. I had no evidence and owned up to it.
What in the world is disingenuous about that? Are you able to do the same?
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)...But do go on about how being told you will go to hell if you don't follow the rules TO THE LETTER because jesus died for your sins encourages free though in ANY WAY AT ALL????
cbayer
(146,218 posts)that you were going to hell.
That must have been very difficult for you and I am not surprised that you feel your free thought was inhibited by that.
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)...and it's the message that is drummed into literally millions of impressionable children around the world...
That's why it has a stifling effect...not all parochial schools are as forward-thinking as your kids's school appear to have been...and that is a real shame because it creates followers not leaders...and that's the real tragedy in all this...
cbayer
(146,218 posts)in a catholic school.
There are posts in this thread that are testaments to an entirely different experience.
I agree that it is a tragedy when schools of any type stifle free thought, but this particular school does not appear to be one of those at all.
That is why I object to cheering it's demise based solely on the fact that it is catholic. That's just wrong.
okasha
(11,573 posts)I attended an Ursuline school. My graduating class, which was pretty much the same 30 girls from 4th. grade on, produced 8 PhD's. Almost all the rest finished BA's and about half of those went on to Masters'.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)Their parents aren't happy and I doubt the kids are happy. Your being happy for them is only because this suits your personal agenda. It has nothing to do with them.
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)If they don't feel oppressed and are fine with it should it just be let go then? Nothing done to help the state of women in that culture?
What about the women that were culturally forced to have genital mutilation? If they are fine with it and happy to live with it, who are we to say it's wrong?
What about women in abusive relationships that are happy?
I'm not saying that religion is any of these things, but as a medical professional, are you seriously saying that people can't be happy about being part of something that is, in fact, very very bad for them?
cbayer
(146,218 posts)One of my children went to catholic school. He's not catholic, wasn't raised religious at all and is an atheist. The school included many non-catholics.
They were taught comparative religions and there was no "daily indoctrination". Participation in religious actives was optional.
In some communities, the options are very limited. The public schools available to my son were terrible, even dangerous.
Before you judge, you really should make sure you know what this school is about and not just evaluate it based on your pre-conceptions.
okasha
(11,573 posts)The children are losing a liberal school with a far better curriculum than public schools that teach to the exit tests.
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)At least it's always interesting to see what will be said here.
okasha
(11,573 posts)But I'm rather surprised to see a public school teacher defending teaching to a test instead of providing a liberal education. The conscientious public school teachers I know are all completely frustrated by the practice.
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)and one that is supposed to project progressive viewpoints.
Where did I say I defended teaching to a test? Where does it say that the public school teachers in this town are lovingly teaching to the test? Where does it say what is going on in the classroom?
But we are back at the point where we began, I don't believe public school bashing so much belongs on a progressive site as it might more so belong on something funded by the Koch Brothers.
okasha
(11,573 posts)Here, I'll help you. "This makes DU suck."
I'm a socialist, not a liberal who's either trying to paper over the l-word or concealing a slide toward the right by calling myself a "progressive."
I don't believe any good is served by pretending that test-driven public education is anything but the disaster it is. YMMV.
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)Where is the indication that schools in that district do that?
Stop making shit up.
okasha
(11,573 posts)Here are some possible subjects:
yachts
genocide
moving goalposts
I will be happy to suggest other topics when you've dealt with those.
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)And what you have claimed I've said?
Are you ok? Seriously?
okasha
(11,573 posts)I haven't said a word about "taxing to the test."
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)What does what you just say have to do with the conversation we were having?
Where have I ever defended teaching to the test? Where have we learned that the district on question does that? Or that they even have poor public schools?
muriel_volestrangler
(101,295 posts)and you have proudly stood by that.
Why have you got an avatar of a Democratic politician? They are pro-public school, you know.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)your description of what she says is quite distorted, and I want to respond.
This is what she says:
She is comparing a specific school with a progressive and liberal curriculum to a specific kind of public school, those that teach to the exit tests.
Nothing in that post says that private schools in general are more liberal than public schools in general and nothing there would indicate that she is not pro-public school. Your backhanded accusation that she not a Democrat is really uncalled for.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,295 posts)There is none; and, given the archdiocese's rules about their teachers' personal lives and what they're allowed to teach, I doubt it is 'liberal'. At best, they will avoid talking about the subjects on which the Catholic church has conservative views.
Okasha assumes the public schools in Marin County teach to exit tests. Otherwise, why bring them up? Cartoonist just talked about the public schools the pupils will go to instead of St. Rita's, and okasha's reply was claiming that the children wouldn't be better off at the public schools, and that therefore Cartoonist was only happy for Cartoonist.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)I suspect one of the reasons this school is being targeted is because it is too liberal, though specific information regarding that is not available.
Okasha does not make an assumption about schools in Marin County. In fact she doesn't mention Marin schools at all, but compares this curriculum to public schools that do teach to the test.
Cartoonist is only happy for Cartoonist, imo. He doesn't appear to care at all whether the children are going to be harmed by this closure. He is just gleeful that a catholic school is closing and is gleeful based solely on it being catholic.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,295 posts)That head teacher is talking about Catholic schools in general perhaps not being as conservative as the hierarchy would like; that doesn't mean they are 'liberal' compared to a typical Marin County public school.
You appear to be saying okasha was trying to hijack the thread, then, if you think she was talking about a situation other than what faces the children. But since okasha was claiming Cartoonist didn't care about these children (as you accuse them of too), then okasha was surely talking about the alternative these children face.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)Her point was very clear, at least to me.
I don't know much about Marin public schools, do you? I do know that California is having significant problems with public education due to financial problems. It looks like the public elementary school has a 4/5 rating, the public middle school a 3/5 rating and St. Rita's a 5/5 rating. That's an internet rating poll and the numbers aren't huge, so it should be taken with a grain of salt. There are also "great schools" ratings, but that is based solely on test scores and St. Rita's is not included.
Why in the world would you think I am saying that Okasha tried to hijack the thread? She is merely making the point that this looks like a pretty good school and that it may be superior to some of the alternatives.
This is the same point I was making.
Cartoonist only appears to care about the children based on his highly prejudiced and erroneous belief that catholic schools are bad.
It's the knee jerk negative assumptions that both she and I are objecting to.
Do you think his assumptions are valid?
muriel_volestrangler
(101,295 posts)Cartoonist assumes that the Catholic church pressures their schools to put forward a Catholic, conservative, perspective. We have evidence they do pressure them; it's possible this school successfully ignored that, but we don't know. So okasha's assumption that this school is more liberal than the alternative public schools looks invalid.
Cartoonist assumes the Catholic school will put forward a Catholic, Christian point of view. We see that a Catholic priest is involved with it; we have a quote from a parent that "our childs experience in school has opened a dialogue in our home about God", so we see that it is inculcating a monotheistic point of view. We can also see the parents link the school to the church:
Gubbins said, "It is becoming a huge fear because the school feeds the church."
Michael Pon, a parent who has three daughters attending St. Rita, said, "The school is the life engine of the church; it creates a lot more energy."
http://www.marinij.com/general-news/20130313/anonymous-donor-pledges-200000-to-help-keep-st-rita-school-open
cbayer
(146,218 posts)assess individual schools on their specific merits and drawbacks.
I really don't have anything else to say here.
okasha
(11,573 posts)That puts you at two moves away from reality.
If you are actually interested in what I have to say about religious and public education, read my post in Warren's bullshit poll thread. To which I will add this:
George Bush did his damnedest to wreck public education in the US, using Texas as his prototype. Schwartzeneger was a disaster for public education in California. I have friends who teach in public schools in both states, and They. Are. Not. Happy. Campers. They're drowning in administrative paperwork, which takes significant time away from lesson prep and teaching. Many of them send their own kids to religious and other private schools, or to magnet schools reflecting their kids' interests. At least in my city, all of these alternatives to the public schools have waiting lists. Parents put their newborns on one parochial school's waiting lists, hoping for a place five years in the future. They're not religious fanatics, and they're not all Catholic. They just want a good education for their kids, which public schools can't always provide.
okasha
(11,573 posts)you're the one hijacking the thread, Muriel. If hijacking concerns you, you have the choice whether to stop it or not.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,295 posts)It was cbayer's contention that you weren't talking about the Fairfax public schools that, if it had been true, would have meant a hijacked thread. I was just pointing out cbayer's contention didn't hold up under inspection.,
okasha
(11,573 posts)I hadn't seen Muriel's posts until about half an hour ago, or I would have stepped in earlier.
And to take the thread completely off-topic--if you haven't encountered capirotada yet, put it on your culinary priority list. I had some of the best ever this evening at a Mexican vegetarian restaurant. Delicious.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)It seems that an interpretation had been made and no amount of reason, rational thinking or accurate information is going to change that.
I have not heard of or seen capirotada, but I'm going to look for it!
okasha
(11,573 posts)Capirotada is a bread pudding served during Lent.The version I had last night also contained pineapple, panela cheese, peanuts, almonds, pecans, cajeta and anise. I bought extra to take home.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)I'm in Guadalajara taking a Spanish class and am taking a food tour tomorrow. I'm going to ask where I can get some capirotada.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)He is a rabidly conservative, homophobe that is demanding all kinds of loyalty oaths from the teachers in SF schools.
Look carefully at what schools he closes before you pop the champagne.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)The majority of kids in this school are not catholic.
The school has introduced a very progressive curriculum.
The school avoids religious indoctrination and focuses on educating students on all the different religions of the world.
The public schools in the area are not good.
The only other alternatives in the neighborhood are private and much more expensive than this one.
Cheering for a schools closing simply because it is catholic shows your true colors, and it's not pretty.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,295 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)The parents who send their kids to this school have indicated that they want values-based instruction and feel the catholic school offers that.
It is not that the public schools aren't good, it is that they don't provide what these parents want.
http://www.marinij.com/opinion/20150304/marin-voice-reasons-for-the-church-to-support-st-rita-school
My point is that cheering the closing of a school based only the fact that it is catholic is highly biased and should be challenged.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)You're damn right it's not. So your initial comment was not based on any facts at all, but only what you hoped was true to further support your narrative that religion provides things that secular and/or governmental institutions are failing at. That's been a consistent theme of yours for a very long time, even causing you to accuse other DUers of proposing genocide when they suggest the RCC should not be able to buy up hospitals and dictate what services can or cannot be offered, even to non-Catholics.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)in this thread.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1218&pid=183912
Here's an opportunity to not just advocate for it, but to DO it. And you're flip flopping.
Fascinating.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)Because DAKWISN!!!!11one1!OMGBBQLOL!
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)with the homophobic and misogynistic beliefs of the RCC.
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)You made shit up that you knew wasn't true, got caught in a lie, and are now trying to backpedal and cover your ass.
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)If you want to put it that way....
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)"I said that incorrectly"
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)One might be better than the other, at any given moment, due to various circumstances, according to certain measures, but at the very least, one has legal constraints, protections, and recourse from various forms of indoctrination and proselytizing. That means, I will ALWAYS prefer, even a temporarily inferior school, for the protections that come with Public funding.
Public school efficacy and efficiency issues are surmountable.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)World stage in the majority of subjects. So not sure what you are trying to say there.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Because no, it doesn't.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)You are right. I misread your last line totally. Sorry about that.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)More RW talking points
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)I only read DU for my news and MANY times it has been brought up that we rank low in Science and Math then the rest of the countries in Europe for example. You must have read OPs that say this when discussing education funding cuts. Now what did you say?
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)To our everyone. Our best to their best puts us about,shockingly, even. You do know most European countries track right? That only their best take the tests that compare.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Should go over well.
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)Yes. Are we significantly below other countries? No. Even Singapore, who tops the test scores sends people to our schools because all they can do is get good test scores and not get the creativity from students that our schools can.
But do we have seriously underfunded districts and areas? Yes. Don't be silly.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)So you support indoctrinating children to believe in homophobia and misogyny. Good to know.
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)Amazing.
Or are you not a "progressive" either?
You base this on what? As you have indicated--on nothing. I think that I have seen it all on a progressive site and then, bam, public education bashing a la Koch brothers.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)Well, at least they are when you're committed to the idea that we need religion to provide education, food shelves, health care, etc. because the government isn't "stepping up to the plate." (And you promote that meme at every chance.)
Yup, eerily similar to the Koch strategy. Freaking sucks to see it here on DU.
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)or at least that's what she says.
Response to cbayer (Reply #20)
Post removed
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)"The public schools in the area are not good."
Which cbayer has already admitted was of questionable reliability, to put it mildly.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)it never fails.
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)And all of the apologists caught out simply making shit up to bolster a non-existent argument, or going straight to their usual unsupported accusations of "bigotry". A jury didn't take long to smack that down, either.
Wonder why?
pinto
(106,886 posts)Each classroom had a cross on the wall, a portrait of the current pope, a portrait of the current US President and an American flag. My US history classroom added a portrait of George Washington. I never felt any were overbearing or some sort of mind control indoctrination.
In the early grades I didn't associate the pictures to anything specific - albeit the cross was just that, not a graphic depiction of a tortuous execution. Later on, to varying degrees we took it all with a grain of salt, imo. Duh, it was a Catholic school. You didn't expect a cross on the wall?
That said, the courses were varied, interesting and engaging. As were the instructors. Some were nuns, some priests, some secular, some decidedly challenging. A varied mix as in any school I guess. We students were not all Catholic. We were not asked to profess any belief. Yet we were asked to engage in our own education, actively not passively. That was a clear standard.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)You didn't experience daily indoctrinization of myths and superstitions.
You weren't restricted to only being with other indoctrinated catholic children?
This can not be true. Your mind has definitely been controlled!
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)clearly theirs are the only valid ones.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)They can try to explain it but it sounds ridiculous to me. Crosses in a Catholic school, what is the world coming to!
cbayer
(146,218 posts)religion experiences. People with PTSD are often very sensitive to symbols or images that remind them of their traumatic experiences.
That's a fact.
What isn't a fact is that what has been traumatic to one person is traumatic to every one else.
While it is noble to want to protect children from traumatic experiences, it is very close minded to think that one's personal experience typifies all experiences.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Catholic school should not surprise anyone here and it is perfectly appreciate.
In my Episcopal Parish's school we have crosses and the kids seem well adjusted to me.
There parents pay 33,000 year to send the kids there and expe t religious education for their children.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)that I object to.
It's no better than those who reject all things associated with atheism or with sexual orientation or any number of things.
Wow, $33,000/year? I'm going to expect a whole lot more than religious education in that case.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Financial aid is available in some of those schooks but not enough.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)Are the public school choices good?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)In the outer boroughs the schools depend on the neighborhood.
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)Oh, wait, no they don't. They just save the rich people that already go there some money.
You really need to look into school choice movement more fully. Just because it had the word "choice" in it doesn't make it a liberal or good thing.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)and they were pretty consistently massively unready to perform at 9th grade levels. The education they got was shitty. The horror stories they told were a source of amazement to the rest of us. You had a different experience, good for you.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)Despite having stellar grades, the parochial schools had such a bad reputation I was still refused admittance into honors courses until I could prove I could hack it there.
The horror stories? All true.
pinto
(106,886 posts)I think that speaks to the flaw in ascribing a cookie cutter assumption to any and all schools. There's good ones and poor ones I guess. I got lucky.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)They couldn't read for shit. I would sometimes skip college prep language arts because the class had to take turns going around the room, reading out loud, and I couldn't stand them bumbling through the material. It was horrifying.
Still got an A with the absences though
(This is purely anecdotal, and may not apply to ANY OTHER SCHOOL ANYWHERE ELSE ON THE PLANET, no rights reserved, preserved, jammed, or jellied.)
Mariana
(14,854 posts)where I lived were behind the public school students, but they were far and away better off than the kids from the two local Baptist schools.
okasha
(11,573 posts)There was a small crucifix above the front blackboard in each room, mostly ignored in favor of a much larger statue of Our Lady of Grace. One room had a humongous picture of St. Angela; another had Jacob with ladder and angels; in an English classroom there was a picture of St. Anne teaching Mary to read. You'd think the place was downright feminist.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)For the least amount of money. Too many positives I. catholic education to see them close. I had K-12 Catholic education and am proud of it. Helped me a great deal in getting my Bachelors and MBA. The deciipline alone was worth it....I am talking about insisting on homework being done and getting good grades. Oh well maybe we can get Congress to save them....lol.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)when it comes to catholic schools. Some have had very positive experiences and some very negative.
That's why it is critical to assess each school independently instead of simply trashing it or praising it just because it is a catholic school.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)We had 15 Catholic schools in our county that all filtered into the high school. However not all 15 were great. I liked my education though. I grew up in Lehigh Valley, Pennsylvania.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)There was a "magnet" system, but it was very difficult to access and not all kids could qualify.
The option of having catholic high schools saved a lot of kids and my experience with them was mostly very positive.
Off topic, but I had the privilege of singing in Lehigh one year in a christmas concert. I will never forget the beautiful star that Bethlehem puts up during the season.
Beautiful area of this country.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)That's also why it is critical to assess each PUBLIC school independently instead of simply trashing it just because it is a PUBLIC school, as you did. And then found out you were so terribly wrong.
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)I do nothing to try get kids to get good grades and do homework. For fucks sake. You don't think that private schools get a good rap because a select group get to go there and if you don't meet those levels they kick you out whereas public schools have to take and teach everyone. That can't be it.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Doesn't sound terribly likely to me, no sir. They just need some boot straps.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)I was listening to a podcast where it was pointed out that "pulling yourself up by your own bootstraps" was originally intended to mean "doing the impossible", as it is literally impossible to do that, and has now come to mean that those not born rich ought to just blame themselves for their condition.
Cartoonist
(7,314 posts)A lot of issues have been raised here. Rather than reply to each item, I will try to address a few.
First and foremost, these kids will not suffer from a bad education elsewhere. As Trotsky pointed out, Marin is very wealthy and our schools have all the modern conveniences. We also have plenty of other private schools that offer eclectic curriculums. They just don't offer that religious bullshit, which is why I am so happy for these kids.
I can't denigrate the quality of education offered by Catholic schools. I attended one for seven years. I made the transition to public school in Junior High without skipping a beat. I do regret having spent at least one hour a day studying all that religious BS. And I resent the fact that I was forced to attend church EVERY day. I consider that child abuse.
One poster tried to score points by remarking about the number of MBA's and PHD's their religious school produced. I am more concerned about how many of them graduated from the superstition and myths they were forced to swallow.
About that crucifix on the wall. Pinto noted that in his school, there was a crucifix in every room, also a picture of the current pope. I remember seeing this swastika, er, I mean this logo:
A couple of posters thought nothing of it. Just typical Catholic decor. They miss the point. It's called reinforcement, or indoctrination, or more accurately, brainwashing. Just look at how effective it was on them. Kids in that environment were never able to be free of the ever present dogma they were forced to respect. They had a dead guy looking over their shoulder in every room. This is the world they were forced to acknowledge and obey. This is why it is so important that our public schools be free of this shit. No crucifixes, no graphics of the Ten Commandments, no creche. Stop fucking with kid's minds.