Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cartoonist

(7,314 posts)
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 11:35 PM Mar 2015

Another One Bites the Dust



Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone has decided to close St. Rita School in Fairfax at the end of this school year because of financial problems.

The news comes two years after school parents and parishioners of St. Rita Church mounted a furious campaign to preserve the Catholic school from a previously planned closure.

“The response of the parishioners was one of anger, disappointment, and frustration,” Weare said. “The parishioners who are older are especially angry because some of them were here helping to build the school 57 years ago; others went to the school, graduated, got married, had children and those children went to our school — so the school is a very central part of our parish community.”


Full story here:
http://www.marinij.com/social-affairs/20150303/archbishop-orders-fairfaxs-st-rita-school-to-close

-
I hope I live long enough to see the closing of my old school.

148 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Another One Bites the Dust (Original Post) Cartoonist Mar 2015 OP
Shame, really. It sounds like a good school with progressive educational strategies. NYC_SKP Mar 2015 #1
Gossip suggests okasha Mar 2015 #2
He's not at all popular among his more free-thinking teaching staff. NYC_SKP Mar 2015 #3
He's a nightmare and it's alarming that his decision is being cheered cbayer Mar 2015 #66
Vouchers and school choice is very much anti-public schools. Goblinmonger Mar 2015 #67
Try to contain your glee. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #4
Why? Warren Stupidity Mar 2015 #5
Because people's hearts are broken. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #6
People here on DU? Warren Stupidity Mar 2015 #7
People in the story. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #8
The story's feelings are hurt? Warren Stupidity Mar 2015 #9
The people inside the story Warren. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #10
Are readers of du? Warren Stupidity Mar 2015 #12
Maybe. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #15
So on the faint possibility that somebody reading this forum Warren Stupidity Mar 2015 #18
Tone policing Warren? hrmjustin Mar 2015 #19
Correct - #4 was definitely tone policing muriel_volestrangler Mar 2015 #22
No mine was sarcasm. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #27
So - you're saying what? muriel_volestrangler Mar 2015 #36
I think you are reading too much into the conversation. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #37
Should all opinions that somebody on the planet might find offensive also be suppressed on DU? Warren Stupidity Mar 2015 #32
No one is suppressing anything. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #33
Huh? Warren Stupidity Mar 2015 #42
Aw! Did I confuse you? hrmjustin Mar 2015 #45
There is only one confused person in this subthread. Warren Stupidity Mar 2015 #55
Well I never requested your help and if I needed help on how to behave you would be the last person hrmjustin Mar 2015 #57
Still haven't answered the question. Warren Stupidity Mar 2015 #59
sssshhhh Goblinmonger Mar 2015 #61
I have a thing about you. lmfao! hrmjustin Mar 2015 #68
You still haven't answered the question. Warren Stupidity Mar 2015 #72
I just did. people can post what they want. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #73
And to answer you question people can post what they want. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #71
So when I asked why you admonished the OP for his "glee" Warren Stupidity Mar 2015 #74
No not at all. i was giving an opinion. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #75
An opinion that the op's glee was inappropriate? Warren Stupidity Mar 2015 #93
I get the goat thing now. okasha Mar 2015 #96
Still trying to figure what his fixation on goats is all about. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #99
He's a foodie. okasha Mar 2015 #124
Why are you so concerned about what I said? hrmjustin Mar 2015 #97
That requires empathy. okasha Mar 2015 #95
I am happy for the children Cartoonist Mar 2015 #14
Have you been to Catholic school as a child? hrmjustin Mar 2015 #16
I wouldn't wish that on anyone. AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #24
7 Years Cartoonist Mar 2015 #26
Is the crucifix stopping freedom? hrmjustin Mar 2015 #28
Read the whole quote...."freedom of thought"... truebrit71 Mar 2015 #29
lol. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #30
A symbol does not stop "freedom of thought". cbayer Mar 2015 #38
Uh huh....like the swastika, or the hammer and sickle yes? truebrit71 Mar 2015 #47
Again, those are just symbols. cbayer Mar 2015 #65
Yup. The physical reminder of the torture and death of someone nailed to a cross.. truebrit71 Mar 2015 #69
What you need to recognize is that what the symbol says to you can not cbayer Mar 2015 #70
Why would I do the same? I haven't made a "mis-statement" that has needed to be walked back... truebrit71 Mar 2015 #79
I am sorry that you were told that if you didn't follow the rules TO THE LETTER cbayer Mar 2015 #82
It wasn't just me... truebrit71 Mar 2015 #85
Of course it wasn't just you, but it also wasn't everyone who had an experience cbayer Mar 2015 #87
Hardly. okasha Mar 2015 #98
You are happy for these kids? Malarkey. cbayer Mar 2015 #39
What about women that are culturally forced to wear a burka? Goblinmonger Mar 2015 #41
Perhaps things have changed since you were a child. cbayer Mar 2015 #17
No, you're happy for you. okasha Mar 2015 #21
Anti-public school sentiments on a Progressive website Goblinmonger Mar 2015 #43
I'm not a "progressive." okasha Mar 2015 #51
Well, this is a progressive website Goblinmonger Mar 2015 #52
So go ahead and alert. okasha Mar 2015 #119
when have i ever pretended that? Goblinmonger Mar 2015 #121
You might want to drop your little admonition closer to home. okasha Mar 2015 #123
what does that have to do with taxing to the test Goblinmonger Mar 2015 #125
That question, too. okasha Mar 2015 #126
Pardon not catching my phone autocorrect Goblinmonger Mar 2015 #127
Wow - you atuomatically assume private schools are more liberal than public ones muriel_volestrangler Mar 2015 #133
I know that Okasha is perfectly capable of defending her position, but cbayer Mar 2015 #134
Where is the evidence for the 'liberal' curriculum? muriel_volestrangler Mar 2015 #135
Did you get to read the link that I gave you earlier? cbayer Mar 2015 #136
In education, 'progressive' is not the same as 'liberal' muriel_volestrangler Mar 2015 #137
Well, since Okasha is in education, I am going to defer the definition to her. cbayer Mar 2015 #138
I think Cartoonist's assumptions are more valid than okasha's, and yours muriel_volestrangler Mar 2015 #139
I'm sorry to hear that. I thought you would be more thoughtful and cbayer Mar 2015 #140
You are making assumptions about my assumptions. okasha Mar 2015 #142
It looks from here like okasha Mar 2015 #143
I think I've remained on topic, and I think you have too, really muriel_volestrangler Mar 2015 #145
Thanks for your posts here. okasha Mar 2015 #144
No worries, though I made little headway. cbayer Mar 2015 #146
Yeah, the "Never mind the facts; I gotta get the secret handshake response okasha Mar 2015 #147
I read up on it and saw that it also can contain meat, which is interesting. cbayer Mar 2015 #148
I would look carefully at anything Cordlieone does. cbayer Mar 2015 #11
Good news! Warren Stupidity Mar 2015 #13
Information about this school to consider before calling in the cheerleaders cbayer Mar 2015 #20
"The public schools in the area are not good" - evidence, please muriel_volestrangler Mar 2015 #23
I said that incorrectly and I withdraw it. cbayer Mar 2015 #34
"It is not that the public schools aren't good" trotsky Mar 2015 #35
Interesting. You said failing to properly advocate for secularizing schools was a missed opportunity AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #40
That's different! trotsky Mar 2015 #50
......... Goblinmonger Mar 2015 #54
"values-based instruction" - so you support indoctrinating children Warren Stupidity Mar 2015 #44
In other words skepticscott Mar 2015 #46
Well, yes.... truebrit71 Mar 2015 #48
I love the euphemism skepticscott Mar 2015 #49
I will NEVER trust a religious school over a public school. Never. AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #25
Except for the fact the we rate extremely low on the yeoman6987 Mar 2015 #102
Maybe you should re-read it, because your objection doesn't apply to what I said. AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #108
I stand by my previous reply. It certainly does. yeoman6987 Mar 2015 #110
Read the first and last sentences REALLY carefully. AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #114
I did have to slow down and read it carefully yeoman6987 Mar 2015 #117
No worries, and I apologize. I could have been a lot nicer in my response. AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #128
oh please Goblinmonger Mar 2015 #109
Hold the phone yeoman6987 Mar 2015 #111
that is comparing their best Goblinmonger Mar 2015 #116
Oh ok....lol. I will invite that to the next OP on funding when it is brought up. yeoman6987 Mar 2015 #118
do we need more funding to meet the needs of all? Goblinmonger Mar 2015 #120
no links no verification = unsubstantiated bullshit Warren Stupidity Mar 2015 #31
So two people on this progressive web site pushing anti-public education. Goblinmonger Mar 2015 #53
Marin County, California. trotsky Mar 2015 #56
Well, one of the people pushing Koch talking points isn't a progressive Goblinmonger Mar 2015 #62
Post removed Post removed Mar 2015 #58
Nobody but religious apologists needs information like skepticscott Mar 2015 #60
what a fabulous train wreck of religious privilege on display here. Warren Stupidity Mar 2015 #63
Privilege and knee-jerk apologetics skepticscott Mar 2015 #64
In re: symbolism. I attended Jesuit Catholic schools. pinto Mar 2015 #76
Wait, what?? Your freedom of thought wasn't restricted? cbayer Mar 2015 #77
The nuns that taught me were rather progressive and taught us to have an open mind. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #78
Not possible. There are those who had experiences different than yours, and cbayer Mar 2015 #80
Lol. The crosses on the wall were stopping freedom! hrmjustin Mar 2015 #81
I thought they stopped vampires, and that's a good thing, right? cbayer Mar 2015 #83
Apparently according to some it stops freedom from going on. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #84
To be fair, I do think there are those who have been traumatized by their cbayer Mar 2015 #86
That is true and I have sympathy for people who had those experiences but crosses in a hrmjustin Mar 2015 #88
I agree. It's the knee jerk rejection of all things catholic, or even all things religious, cbayer Mar 2015 #89
33,000 is average for private schools in Manhattan including some Chatholic schools now. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #90
Wow! Talk about restricting parent choice. cbayer Mar 2015 #91
In Manhattan yes for the most psrt except for some schools in the north of the island. hrmjustin Mar 2015 #92
and vouchers totally make it so poor kids can go there. Goblinmonger Mar 2015 #100
I attended public school. In 9th grade all the parochial kids got poured into the high school Warren Stupidity Mar 2015 #94
I was one of those 9th graders. Act_of_Reparation Mar 2015 #103
Yeah, I had a decidedly different experience. pinto Mar 2015 #107
We got a bunch from the local Lutheran school, same, 9th grade. AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #112
The 9th graders from the parochial schools Mariana Mar 2015 #130
My school had pretty much the same decor. okasha Mar 2015 #122
Horrid news. Catholic schools offer the best education yeoman6987 Mar 2015 #101
It seems clear from this thread that there is a broad spectrum cbayer Mar 2015 #104
I agree. I was lucky to live and grow up where yeoman6987 Mar 2015 #105
I raised my kids in a place where the public education system was a disaster. cbayer Mar 2015 #106
Thanks. I am glad you enjoyed the area. yeoman6987 Mar 2015 #115
... trotsky Mar 2015 #132
as a public school teacher Goblinmonger Mar 2015 #113
Wait, are you suggesting kids that have basic needs (like food) met, do better in school? AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #129
Speaking of "boot straps" Warren Stupidity Mar 2015 #131
A general response Cartoonist Mar 2015 #141
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
1. Shame, really. It sounds like a good school with progressive educational strategies.
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 11:57 PM
Mar 2015
Since joining the school in August 2013, Black has been trying to adjust the K-8 school’s curriculum to attract more students. This year the school’s elementary school teachers began using the International Baccalaureate approach to instruction, which was created in Switzerland in 1968 for students in international schools.

Instead of teaching subjects such as science, math and history separately, “all of the subjects are woven thematically,” Black said. “Those different themes have a strong environmental component, a strong cultural component and a strong international component. It enhances critical thinking and problem solving.”

In addition, the school’s middle school teachers began adding a new project-based learning component to their classes that emphasizes science, technology, engineering and math.

Black said those curriculum changes are a “good way to differentiate ourselves from other Catholic schools and other private and public schools as well.”


I hope the students will have options that aren't depressingly bad.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
2. Gossip suggests
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 12:45 AM
Mar 2015

that Cordileone is the next right-wing American prelate slated for a rock in the middle of nowhere. St. Rita's sounds like just the sort of school he'd want to shut down.

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
3. He's not at all popular among his more free-thinking teaching staff.
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 01:08 AM
Mar 2015
Over 350 Catholic School Teachers Call On San Francisco Archbishop To Drop Morality Clauses

SAN FRANCISCO (CBS SF) – More than 350 teachers in high schools administrated by the Catholic Archdiocese of San Francisco signed a letter urging Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone to drop proposed morality clauses from the teacher handbook.

According to organizers, 80 percent of the faculty and staff at the affected schools signed the letter. Organizers said they received signatures from 126 teachers and staff from Sacred Heart Cathedral Prep, 87 from Serra High School in San Mateo, 74 at Archbishop Riordan and 68 at Marin Catholic.

In the letter, the teachers said, “We believe the recently proposed handbook language is harmful to our community and creates an atmosphere of mistrust and fear. We believe our schools should be places of inquiry and the free exchange of ideas where all feel welcome and affirmed.”

“This language in this judgmental context undermines the mission of Catholic education and the inclusive, diverse and welcoming community we prize at our schools,” said Sacred Heart Cathedral teacher Jim Jordan, who helped organize the campaign.

http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2015/03/03/catholic-school-teachers-archdiocese-san-francisco-archbishop-salvatore-cordileone-morality-clauses-abortion-contraception-same-sex-marriage/

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
66. He's a nightmare and it's alarming that his decision is being cheered
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 05:09 PM
Mar 2015

by those who don't have any knowledge about this school other than it is catholic.

Supporting parent choice is not anti-public school and there are lots of excellent parochial schools in this country.

But its catholic!!!! It has to be very, very bad!!!!!

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
67. Vouchers and school choice is very much anti-public schools.
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 05:11 PM
Mar 2015

That's what it's all about. Take a look at who is supporting the voucher movement and get back to me.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
18. So on the faint possibility that somebody reading this forum
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 10:49 AM
Mar 2015

might take offense at the OP's opinion of catholic schools, you took it upon yourself to admonish the op for expressing that opinion.

Should all opinions that somebody on the planet might find offensive also be suppressed on DU?

muriel_volestrangler

(101,295 posts)
36. So - you're saying what?
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 01:26 PM
Mar 2015

#19 was sarcasm, because it was already obvious to everyone that #4 was tone policing, and you didn't think it needed anyone to point it out?

#4 was sarcasm, because you actually feel the 'glee' too?

Something else?

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
37. I think you are reading too much into the conversation.
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 01:29 PM
Mar 2015

Warren and I are just having another moment. No big deal.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
32. Should all opinions that somebody on the planet might find offensive also be suppressed on DU?
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 01:10 PM
Mar 2015

Still waiting for an answer.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
42. Huh?
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 02:01 PM
Mar 2015

"Try to contain your glee."

Sarcasm:


The use of words that mean the opposite of what you really want to say especially in order to insult someone, to show irritation, or to be funny


So what your really meant was "Please express more glee"?

I agree that nobody is being successful in suppressing anything, and I of course agree that you were tone trolling. But that wasn't my question up above, the one you still aren't answering.

Be honest Justin, you attempted to scold the OP for expressing what you perceived to be "glee" at the closing of a religious school. You further indicated that you felt the "glee" expressed was inappropriate because it could hurt the feelings of some people reading the message. Fine. That is your opinion and you are welcome to it. Now, do you also apply the same standard to all other opinions expressed here on DU? That they should not be expressed here if they could hurt anyone on the planet's feelings?
 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
55. There is only one confused person in this subthread.
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 03:10 PM
Mar 2015

I tried to help you Justin with the definition of sarcastic, but it seems that you still think it just means "nasty".

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
57. Well I never requested your help and if I needed help on how to behave you would be the last person
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 03:25 PM
Mar 2015

i would ask.

Cheers Warren!

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
59. Still haven't answered the question.
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 03:39 PM
Mar 2015

I understand that you have a thing about me. That wasn't the question. Just in case you've forgotten:

Do you disapprove of the expression of all opinions that might upset anyone who could possibly read DU?

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
68. I have a thing about you. lmfao!
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 05:14 PM
Mar 2015

Warren I assure you I don't go looking for you, but you come looking for me.

I am not the one banned from safe havens.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
72. You still haven't answered the question.
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 05:31 PM
Mar 2015

Just in case you've forgotten:

Do you disapprove of the expression of all opinions that might upset anyone who could possibly read DU?

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
74. So when I asked why you admonished the OP for his "glee"
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 05:33 PM
Mar 2015

and you responded:


Because people's hearts are broken. Put yourself in their shoes Warren.


That response was bullshit?

Cartoonist

(7,314 posts)
14. I am happy for the children
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 10:06 AM
Mar 2015

Unless their parents are willing to pony up the money to send them to another parish, they will have to attend a public school. No more daily indoctrinization of myths and superstitions. They will meet other kids of other faiths, maybe even an atheist. They will be exposed to new ways of thinking. As for those whose feelings are hurt because they will no longer be able to control their children's minds, a pox on them.

Cartoonist

(7,314 posts)
26. 7 Years
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 12:29 PM
Mar 2015

While I acknowledge that things have changed, a z Catholic school is more than just a classroom with a crucifix on the wall. Just the removal of that symbol alone is a major victory for freedom of thought. I couldn't be happier for these kids and my country.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
38. A symbol does not stop "freedom of thought".
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 01:29 PM
Mar 2015

Does these symbols alone stop freedom of thought?




Of course they don't.

Symbols can be used to intimidate, marginalize, dictate certain ways of speaking or thinking, but they are just symbols.

As I noted, my son went to a catholic school. He's an atheist. There were crosses in the classrooms. He freedom of thought was not restricted or prevented.

 

truebrit71

(20,805 posts)
47. Uh huh....like the swastika, or the hammer and sickle yes?
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 02:25 PM
Mar 2015

For an impressionable child the ever-present reminder of a horrific and violent death absolutely stifles freedom of thought...

The message is quite clear...

Not that you are being deliberately disingenuous or anything....

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
65. Again, those are just symbols.
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 04:52 PM
Mar 2015

In fact, the swastika has a history that pre-dates it's use by the nazis and has been a very positive symbol in some cultures.

For many people, the crucifix is a symbol of something very positive. You can not extend your experience of that symbol on to anyone else.

If you can show me data that supports your position that the crucifix stifles freedom of thought, I would be glad to look at it.

Without that, it is simply your opinion, unsupported by evidence and based on faith.

When you resort to personal insults, you have surrendered. I accept your capitulation.

 

truebrit71

(20,805 posts)
69. Yup. The physical reminder of the torture and death of someone nailed to a cross..
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 05:20 PM
Mar 2015

...to a 6 or 7 year-old is so freeing....so inspiring to free thoughts rather than obeying the doctrinal commands of those in power over you at the school to do as you are told because the nailed dead guy suffered for YOUR sins....so freeing...

I see that you have surrendered logic and decided to stick with being disingenuous. I accept your capitulation.

Oh, and I think it's more than a little rich for you to use the phrase "unsupported by evidence" in the very same thread where you have been shown to have done the very same thing...

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
70. What you need to recognize is that what the symbol says to you can not
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 05:29 PM
Mar 2015

extended to anyone else. There are likely people who share your feelings, but it's not true for everyone. I was raised in the church and my experience is distinctly different than yours. I was raised in a tradition of free thought where questions were encouraged and expected.

More personal insults?

I misread an article and made a misstatement. I researched further, saw that I was mistaken and withdrew the statement. I had no evidence and owned up to it.

What in the world is disingenuous about that? Are you able to do the same?

 

truebrit71

(20,805 posts)
79. Why would I do the same? I haven't made a "mis-statement" that has needed to be walked back...
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 05:51 PM
Mar 2015

...But do go on about how being told you will go to hell if you don't follow the rules TO THE LETTER because jesus died for your sins encourages free though in ANY WAY AT ALL????

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
82. I am sorry that you were told that if you didn't follow the rules TO THE LETTER
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 05:54 PM
Mar 2015

that you were going to hell.

That must have been very difficult for you and I am not surprised that you feel your free thought was inhibited by that.

 

truebrit71

(20,805 posts)
85. It wasn't just me...
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 06:02 PM
Mar 2015

...and it's the message that is drummed into literally millions of impressionable children around the world...

That's why it has a stifling effect...not all parochial schools are as forward-thinking as your kids's school appear to have been...and that is a real shame because it creates followers not leaders...and that's the real tragedy in all this...

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
87. Of course it wasn't just you, but it also wasn't everyone who had an experience
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 06:06 PM
Mar 2015

in a catholic school.

There are posts in this thread that are testaments to an entirely different experience.

I agree that it is a tragedy when schools of any type stifle free thought, but this particular school does not appear to be one of those at all.

That is why I object to cheering it's demise based solely on the fact that it is catholic. That's just wrong.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
98. Hardly.
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 06:51 PM
Mar 2015

I attended an Ursuline school. My graduating class, which was pretty much the same 30 girls from 4th. grade on, produced 8 PhD's. Almost all the rest finished BA's and about half of those went on to Masters'.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
39. You are happy for these kids? Malarkey.
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 01:30 PM
Mar 2015

Their parents aren't happy and I doubt the kids are happy. Your being happy for them is only because this suits your personal agenda. It has nothing to do with them.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
41. What about women that are culturally forced to wear a burka?
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 01:54 PM
Mar 2015

If they don't feel oppressed and are fine with it should it just be let go then? Nothing done to help the state of women in that culture?

What about the women that were culturally forced to have genital mutilation? If they are fine with it and happy to live with it, who are we to say it's wrong?

What about women in abusive relationships that are happy?

I'm not saying that religion is any of these things, but as a medical professional, are you seriously saying that people can't be happy about being part of something that is, in fact, very very bad for them?

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
17. Perhaps things have changed since you were a child.
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 10:15 AM
Mar 2015

One of my children went to catholic school. He's not catholic, wasn't raised religious at all and is an atheist. The school included many non-catholics.

They were taught comparative religions and there was no "daily indoctrination". Participation in religious actives was optional.

In some communities, the options are very limited. The public schools available to my son were terrible, even dangerous.

Before you judge, you really should make sure you know what this school is about and not just evaluate it based on your pre-conceptions.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
21. No, you're happy for you.
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 11:26 AM
Mar 2015

The children are losing a liberal school with a far better curriculum than public schools that teach to the exit tests.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
43. Anti-public school sentiments on a Progressive website
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 02:04 PM
Mar 2015

At least it's always interesting to see what will be said here.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
51. I'm not a "progressive."
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 02:48 PM
Mar 2015

But I'm rather surprised to see a public school teacher defending teaching to a test instead of providing a liberal education. The conscientious public school teachers I know are all completely frustrated by the practice.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
52. Well, this is a progressive website
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 02:51 PM
Mar 2015

and one that is supposed to project progressive viewpoints.

Where did I say I defended teaching to a test? Where does it say that the public school teachers in this town are lovingly teaching to the test? Where does it say what is going on in the classroom?

But we are back at the point where we began, I don't believe public school bashing so much belongs on a progressive site as it might more so belong on something funded by the Koch Brothers.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
119. So go ahead and alert.
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 10:00 PM
Mar 2015

Here, I'll help you. "This makes DU suck."

I'm a socialist, not a liberal who's either trying to paper over the l-word or concealing a slide toward the right by calling myself a "progressive."

I don't believe any good is served by pretending that test-driven public education is anything but the disaster it is. YMMV.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
121. when have i ever pretended that?
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 10:02 PM
Mar 2015

Where is the indication that schools in that district do that?

Stop making shit up.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
123. You might want to drop your little admonition closer to home.
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 10:57 PM
Mar 2015

Here are some possible subjects:

yachts
genocide
moving goalposts

I will be happy to suggest other topics when you've dealt with those.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
125. what does that have to do with taxing to the test
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 11:37 PM
Mar 2015

And what you have claimed I've said?

Are you ok? Seriously?

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
127. Pardon not catching my phone autocorrect
Fri Mar 6, 2015, 12:00 AM
Mar 2015

What does what you just say have to do with the conversation we were having?

Where have I ever defended teaching to the test? Where have we learned that the district on question does that? Or that they even have poor public schools?

muriel_volestrangler

(101,295 posts)
133. Wow - you atuomatically assume private schools are more liberal than public ones
Fri Mar 6, 2015, 03:16 PM
Mar 2015

and you have proudly stood by that.

Why have you got an avatar of a Democratic politician? They are pro-public school, you know.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
134. I know that Okasha is perfectly capable of defending her position, but
Fri Mar 6, 2015, 04:34 PM
Mar 2015

your description of what she says is quite distorted, and I want to respond.

This is what she says:

The children are losing a liberal school with a far better curriculum than public schools that teach to the exit tests.


She is comparing a specific school with a progressive and liberal curriculum to a specific kind of public school, those that teach to the exit tests.

Nothing in that post says that private schools in general are more liberal than public schools in general and nothing there would indicate that she is not pro-public school. Your backhanded accusation that she not a Democrat is really uncalled for.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,295 posts)
135. Where is the evidence for the 'liberal' curriculum?
Fri Mar 6, 2015, 05:24 PM
Mar 2015

There is none; and, given the archdiocese's rules about their teachers' personal lives and what they're allowed to teach, I doubt it is 'liberal'. At best, they will avoid talking about the subjects on which the Catholic church has conservative views.

Okasha assumes the public schools in Marin County teach to exit tests. Otherwise, why bring them up? Cartoonist just talked about the public schools the pupils will go to instead of St. Rita's, and okasha's reply was claiming that the children wouldn't be better off at the public schools, and that therefore Cartoonist was only happy for Cartoonist.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
136. Did you get to read the link that I gave you earlier?
Fri Mar 6, 2015, 05:35 PM
Mar 2015
http://www.marinij.com/opinion/20150304/marin-voice-reasons-for-the-church-to-support-st-rita-school

St. Rita School in Fairfax nearly closed two years ago due to declining enrollment, and is now facing closure again. Despite its attempt to become more progressive with the implementation of the International Baccalaureate program in elementary school and a STEM program in middle school, its survival is not a worthy cause in the eyes of San Francisco’s archbishop.


the dedicated teachers and administrators of Catholic schools carry on, committed to providing a high-quality product, even if that product does not always meet the conservative preferences of the church’s hierarchy.


I suspect one of the reasons this school is being targeted is because it is too liberal, though specific information regarding that is not available.

Okasha does not make an assumption about schools in Marin County. In fact she doesn't mention Marin schools at all, but compares this curriculum to public schools that do teach to the test.

Cartoonist is only happy for Cartoonist, imo. He doesn't appear to care at all whether the children are going to be harmed by this closure. He is just gleeful that a catholic school is closing and is gleeful based solely on it being catholic.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,295 posts)
137. In education, 'progressive' is not the same as 'liberal'
Fri Mar 6, 2015, 05:54 PM
Mar 2015

That head teacher is talking about Catholic schools in general perhaps not being as conservative as the hierarchy would like; that doesn't mean they are 'liberal' compared to a typical Marin County public school.

You appear to be saying okasha was trying to hijack the thread, then, if you think she was talking about a situation other than what faces the children. But since okasha was claiming Cartoonist didn't care about these children (as you accuse them of too), then okasha was surely talking about the alternative these children face.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
138. Well, since Okasha is in education, I am going to defer the definition to her.
Fri Mar 6, 2015, 06:12 PM
Mar 2015

Her point was very clear, at least to me.

I don't know much about Marin public schools, do you? I do know that California is having significant problems with public education due to financial problems. It looks like the public elementary school has a 4/5 rating, the public middle school a 3/5 rating and St. Rita's a 5/5 rating. That's an internet rating poll and the numbers aren't huge, so it should be taken with a grain of salt. There are also "great schools" ratings, but that is based solely on test scores and St. Rita's is not included.

Why in the world would you think I am saying that Okasha tried to hijack the thread? She is merely making the point that this looks like a pretty good school and that it may be superior to some of the alternatives.

This is the same point I was making.

Cartoonist only appears to care about the children based on his highly prejudiced and erroneous belief that catholic schools are bad.

It's the knee jerk negative assumptions that both she and I are objecting to.

Do you think his assumptions are valid?

muriel_volestrangler

(101,295 posts)
139. I think Cartoonist's assumptions are more valid than okasha's, and yours
Fri Mar 6, 2015, 06:29 PM
Mar 2015

Cartoonist assumes that the Catholic church pressures their schools to put forward a Catholic, conservative, perspective. We have evidence they do pressure them; it's possible this school successfully ignored that, but we don't know. So okasha's assumption that this school is more liberal than the alternative public schools looks invalid.

Cartoonist assumes the Catholic school will put forward a Catholic, Christian point of view. We see that a Catholic priest is involved with it; we have a quote from a parent that "our child’s experience in school has opened a dialogue in our home about God", so we see that it is inculcating a monotheistic point of view. We can also see the parents link the school to the church:

Braun said, "The fear is that if the school were to go then the church is the next to go."

Gubbins said, "It is becoming a huge fear because the school feeds the church."

Michael Pon, a parent who has three daughters attending St. Rita, said, "The school is the life engine of the church; it creates a lot more energy."

http://www.marinij.com/general-news/20130313/anonymous-donor-pledges-200000-to-help-keep-st-rita-school-open

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
140. I'm sorry to hear that. I thought you would be more thoughtful and
Fri Mar 6, 2015, 06:34 PM
Mar 2015

assess individual schools on their specific merits and drawbacks.

I really don't have anything else to say here.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
142. You are making assumptions about my assumptions.
Sat Mar 7, 2015, 01:01 AM
Mar 2015

That puts you at two moves away from reality.

If you are actually interested in what I have to say about religious and public education, read my post in Warren's bullshit poll thread. To which I will add this:

George Bush did his damnedest to wreck public education in the US, using Texas as his prototype. Schwartzeneger was a disaster for public education in California. I have friends who teach in public schools in both states, and They. Are. Not. Happy. Campers. They're drowning in administrative paperwork, which takes significant time away from lesson prep and teaching. Many of them send their own kids to religious and other private schools, or to magnet schools reflecting their kids' interests. At least in my city, all of these alternatives to the public schools have waiting lists. Parents put their newborns on one parochial school's waiting lists, hoping for a place five years in the future. They're not religious fanatics, and they're not all Catholic. They just want a good education for their kids, which public schools can't always provide.







okasha

(11,573 posts)
143. It looks from here like
Sat Mar 7, 2015, 01:12 AM
Mar 2015

you're the one hijacking the thread, Muriel. If hijacking concerns you, you have the choice whether to stop it or not.



muriel_volestrangler

(101,295 posts)
145. I think I've remained on topic, and I think you have too, really
Sat Mar 7, 2015, 05:52 AM
Mar 2015

It was cbayer's contention that you weren't talking about the Fairfax public schools that, if it had been true, would have meant a hijacked thread. I was just pointing out cbayer's contention didn't hold up under inspection.,

okasha

(11,573 posts)
144. Thanks for your posts here.
Sat Mar 7, 2015, 01:30 AM
Mar 2015

I hadn't seen Muriel's posts until about half an hour ago, or I would have stepped in earlier.

And to take the thread completely off-topic--if you haven't encountered capirotada yet, put it on your culinary priority list. I had some of the best ever this evening at a Mexican vegetarian restaurant. Delicious.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
146. No worries, though I made little headway.
Sat Mar 7, 2015, 10:03 AM
Mar 2015

It seems that an interpretation had been made and no amount of reason, rational thinking or accurate information is going to change that.

I have not heard of or seen capirotada, but I'm going to look for it!

okasha

(11,573 posts)
147. Yeah, the "Never mind the facts; I gotta get the secret handshake response
Sat Mar 7, 2015, 01:16 PM
Mar 2015

Capirotada is a bread pudding served during Lent.The version I had last night also contained pineapple, panela cheese, peanuts, almonds, pecans, cajeta and anise. I bought extra to take home.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
148. I read up on it and saw that it also can contain meat, which is interesting.
Sat Mar 7, 2015, 01:19 PM
Mar 2015

I'm in Guadalajara taking a Spanish class and am taking a food tour tomorrow. I'm going to ask where I can get some capirotada.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
11. I would look carefully at anything Cordlieone does.
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 09:32 AM
Mar 2015

He is a rabidly conservative, homophobe that is demanding all kinds of loyalty oaths from the teachers in SF schools.

Look carefully at what schools he closes before you pop the champagne.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
20. Information about this school to consider before calling in the cheerleaders
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 10:53 AM
Mar 2015

The majority of kids in this school are not catholic.

The school has introduced a very progressive curriculum.

The school avoids religious indoctrination and focuses on educating students on all the different religions of the world.

The public schools in the area are not good.

The only other alternatives in the neighborhood are private and much more expensive than this one.

Cheering for a schools closing simply because it is catholic shows your true colors, and it's not pretty.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
34. I said that incorrectly and I withdraw it.
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 01:18 PM
Mar 2015

The parents who send their kids to this school have indicated that they want values-based instruction and feel the catholic school offers that.

It is not that the public schools aren't good, it is that they don't provide what these parents want.

http://www.marinij.com/opinion/20150304/marin-voice-reasons-for-the-church-to-support-st-rita-school

My point is that cheering the closing of a school based only the fact that it is catholic is highly biased and should be challenged.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
35. "It is not that the public schools aren't good"
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 01:23 PM
Mar 2015

You're damn right it's not. So your initial comment was not based on any facts at all, but only what you hoped was true to further support your narrative that religion provides things that secular and/or governmental institutions are failing at. That's been a consistent theme of yours for a very long time, even causing you to accuse other DUers of proposing genocide when they suggest the RCC should not be able to buy up hospitals and dictate what services can or cannot be offered, even to non-Catholics.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
40. Interesting. You said failing to properly advocate for secularizing schools was a missed opportunity
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 01:47 PM
Mar 2015

in this thread.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1218&pid=183912

Here's an opportunity to not just advocate for it, but to DO it. And you're flip flopping.

Fascinating.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
44. "values-based instruction" - so you support indoctrinating children
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 02:04 PM
Mar 2015

with the homophobic and misogynistic beliefs of the RCC.

 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
46. In other words
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 02:21 PM
Mar 2015

You made shit up that you knew wasn't true, got caught in a lie, and are now trying to backpedal and cover your ass.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
25. I will NEVER trust a religious school over a public school. Never.
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 12:11 PM
Mar 2015

One might be better than the other, at any given moment, due to various circumstances, according to certain measures, but at the very least, one has legal constraints, protections, and recourse from various forms of indoctrination and proselytizing. That means, I will ALWAYS prefer, even a temporarily inferior school, for the protections that come with Public funding.

Public school efficacy and efficiency issues are surmountable.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
102. Except for the fact the we rate extremely low on the
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 07:55 PM
Mar 2015

World stage in the majority of subjects. So not sure what you are trying to say there.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
117. I did have to slow down and read it carefully
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 09:56 PM
Mar 2015

You are right. I misread your last line totally. Sorry about that.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
111. Hold the phone
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 09:52 PM
Mar 2015

I only read DU for my news and MANY times it has been brought up that we rank low in Science and Math then the rest of the countries in Europe for example. You must have read OPs that say this when discussing education funding cuts. Now what did you say?

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
116. that is comparing their best
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 09:55 PM
Mar 2015

To our everyone. Our best to their best puts us about,shockingly, even. You do know most European countries track right? That only their best take the tests that compare.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
118. Oh ok....lol. I will invite that to the next OP on funding when it is brought up.
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 09:57 PM
Mar 2015

Should go over well.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
120. do we need more funding to meet the needs of all?
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 10:00 PM
Mar 2015

Yes. Are we significantly below other countries? No. Even Singapore, who tops the test scores sends people to our schools because all they can do is get good test scores and not get the creativity from students that our schools can.

But do we have seriously underfunded districts and areas? Yes. Don't be silly.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
31. no links no verification = unsubstantiated bullshit
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 01:08 PM
Mar 2015

So you support indoctrinating children to believe in homophobia and misogyny. Good to know.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
53. So two people on this progressive web site pushing anti-public education.
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 02:56 PM
Mar 2015

Amazing.

Or are you not a "progressive" either?

The public schools in the area are not good.


You base this on what? As you have indicated--on nothing. I think that I have seen it all on a progressive site and then, bam, public education bashing a la Koch brothers.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
56. Marin County, California.
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 03:21 PM
Mar 2015
17th richest county in the entire U.S. of A. Oh, I'm sure its public schools are shit.

Well, at least they are when you're committed to the idea that we need religion to provide education, food shelves, health care, etc. because the government isn't "stepping up to the plate." (And you promote that meme at every chance.)

Yup, eerily similar to the Koch strategy. Freaking sucks to see it here on DU.
 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
62. Well, one of the people pushing Koch talking points isn't a progressive
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 04:11 PM
Mar 2015

or at least that's what she says.

Response to cbayer (Reply #20)

 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
60. Nobody but religious apologists needs information like
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 03:42 PM
Mar 2015

"The public schools in the area are not good."

Which cbayer has already admitted was of questionable reliability, to put it mildly.

 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
64. Privilege and knee-jerk apologetics
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 04:41 PM
Mar 2015

And all of the apologists caught out simply making shit up to bolster a non-existent argument, or going straight to their usual unsupported accusations of "bigotry". A jury didn't take long to smack that down, either.

Wonder why?

pinto

(106,886 posts)
76. In re: symbolism. I attended Jesuit Catholic schools.
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 05:44 PM
Mar 2015

Each classroom had a cross on the wall, a portrait of the current pope, a portrait of the current US President and an American flag. My US history classroom added a portrait of George Washington. I never felt any were overbearing or some sort of mind control indoctrination.

In the early grades I didn't associate the pictures to anything specific - albeit the cross was just that, not a graphic depiction of a tortuous execution. Later on, to varying degrees we took it all with a grain of salt, imo. Duh, it was a Catholic school. You didn't expect a cross on the wall?

That said, the courses were varied, interesting and engaging. As were the instructors. Some were nuns, some priests, some secular, some decidedly challenging. A varied mix as in any school I guess. We students were not all Catholic. We were not asked to profess any belief. Yet we were asked to engage in our own education, actively not passively. That was a clear standard.



cbayer

(146,218 posts)
77. Wait, what?? Your freedom of thought wasn't restricted?
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 05:49 PM
Mar 2015

You didn't experience daily indoctrinization of myths and superstitions.

You weren't restricted to only being with other indoctrinated catholic children?

This can not be true. Your mind has definitely been controlled!

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
80. Not possible. There are those who had experiences different than yours, and
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 05:52 PM
Mar 2015

clearly theirs are the only valid ones.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
84. Apparently according to some it stops freedom from going on.
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 05:58 PM
Mar 2015

They can try to explain it but it sounds ridiculous to me. Crosses in a Catholic school, what is the world coming to!

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
86. To be fair, I do think there are those who have been traumatized by their
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 06:03 PM
Mar 2015

religion experiences. People with PTSD are often very sensitive to symbols or images that remind them of their traumatic experiences.

That's a fact.

What isn't a fact is that what has been traumatic to one person is traumatic to every one else.

While it is noble to want to protect children from traumatic experiences, it is very close minded to think that one's personal experience typifies all experiences.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
88. That is true and I have sympathy for people who had those experiences but crosses in a
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 06:07 PM
Mar 2015

Catholic school should not surprise anyone here and it is perfectly appreciate.

In my Episcopal Parish's school we have crosses and the kids seem well adjusted to me.

There parents pay 33,000 year to send the kids there and expe t religious education for their children.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
89. I agree. It's the knee jerk rejection of all things catholic, or even all things religious,
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 06:11 PM
Mar 2015

that I object to.

It's no better than those who reject all things associated with atheism or with sexual orientation or any number of things.

Wow, $33,000/year? I'm going to expect a whole lot more than religious education in that case.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
90. 33,000 is average for private schools in Manhattan including some Chatholic schools now.
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 06:14 PM
Mar 2015

Financial aid is available in some of those schooks but not enough.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
92. In Manhattan yes for the most psrt except for some schools in the north of the island.
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 06:17 PM
Mar 2015

In the outer boroughs the schools depend on the neighborhood.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
100. and vouchers totally make it so poor kids can go there.
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 07:22 PM
Mar 2015

Oh, wait, no they don't. They just save the rich people that already go there some money.

You really need to look into school choice movement more fully. Just because it had the word "choice" in it doesn't make it a liberal or good thing.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
94. I attended public school. In 9th grade all the parochial kids got poured into the high school
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 06:42 PM
Mar 2015

and they were pretty consistently massively unready to perform at 9th grade levels. The education they got was shitty. The horror stories they told were a source of amazement to the rest of us. You had a different experience, good for you.

Act_of_Reparation

(9,116 posts)
103. I was one of those 9th graders.
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 08:06 PM
Mar 2015

Despite having stellar grades, the parochial schools had such a bad reputation I was still refused admittance into honors courses until I could prove I could hack it there.

The horror stories? All true.

pinto

(106,886 posts)
107. Yeah, I had a decidedly different experience.
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 08:40 PM
Mar 2015

I think that speaks to the flaw in ascribing a cookie cutter assumption to any and all schools. There's good ones and poor ones I guess. I got lucky.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
112. We got a bunch from the local Lutheran school, same, 9th grade.
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 09:52 PM
Mar 2015

They couldn't read for shit. I would sometimes skip college prep language arts because the class had to take turns going around the room, reading out loud, and I couldn't stand them bumbling through the material. It was horrifying.

Still got an A with the absences though

(This is purely anecdotal, and may not apply to ANY OTHER SCHOOL ANYWHERE ELSE ON THE PLANET, no rights reserved, preserved, jammed, or jellied.)

Mariana

(14,854 posts)
130. The 9th graders from the parochial schools
Fri Mar 6, 2015, 02:03 AM
Mar 2015

where I lived were behind the public school students, but they were far and away better off than the kids from the two local Baptist schools.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
122. My school had pretty much the same decor.
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 10:15 PM
Mar 2015

There was a small crucifix above the front blackboard in each room, mostly ignored in favor of a much larger statue of Our Lady of Grace. One room had a humongous picture of St. Angela; another had Jacob with ladder and angels; in an English classroom there was a picture of St. Anne teaching Mary to read. You'd think the place was downright feminist.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
101. Horrid news. Catholic schools offer the best education
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 07:46 PM
Mar 2015

For the least amount of money. Too many positives I. catholic education to see them close. I had K-12 Catholic education and am proud of it. Helped me a great deal in getting my Bachelors and MBA. The deciipline alone was worth it....I am talking about insisting on homework being done and getting good grades. Oh well maybe we can get Congress to save them....lol.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
104. It seems clear from this thread that there is a broad spectrum
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 08:15 PM
Mar 2015

when it comes to catholic schools. Some have had very positive experiences and some very negative.

That's why it is critical to assess each school independently instead of simply trashing it or praising it just because it is a catholic school.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
105. I agree. I was lucky to live and grow up where
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 08:20 PM
Mar 2015

We had 15 Catholic schools in our county that all filtered into the high school. However not all 15 were great. I liked my education though. I grew up in Lehigh Valley, Pennsylvania.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
106. I raised my kids in a place where the public education system was a disaster.
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 08:36 PM
Mar 2015

There was a "magnet" system, but it was very difficult to access and not all kids could qualify.

The option of having catholic high schools saved a lot of kids and my experience with them was mostly very positive.

Off topic, but I had the privilege of singing in Lehigh one year in a christmas concert. I will never forget the beautiful star that Bethlehem puts up during the season.

Beautiful area of this country.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
132. ...
Fri Mar 6, 2015, 09:38 AM
Mar 2015
That's why it is critical to assess each school independently instead of simply trashing it or praising it just because it is a catholic school.

That's also why it is critical to assess each PUBLIC school independently instead of simply trashing it just because it is a PUBLIC school, as you did. And then found out you were so terribly wrong.
 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
113. as a public school teacher
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 09:52 PM
Mar 2015

I do nothing to try get kids to get good grades and do homework. For fucks sake. You don't think that private schools get a good rap because a select group get to go there and if you don't meet those levels they kick you out whereas public schools have to take and teach everyone. That can't be it.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
129. Wait, are you suggesting kids that have basic needs (like food) met, do better in school?
Fri Mar 6, 2015, 01:29 AM
Mar 2015

Doesn't sound terribly likely to me, no sir. They just need some boot straps.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
131. Speaking of "boot straps"
Fri Mar 6, 2015, 08:42 AM
Mar 2015

I was listening to a podcast where it was pointed out that "pulling yourself up by your own bootstraps" was originally intended to mean "doing the impossible", as it is literally impossible to do that, and has now come to mean that those not born rich ought to just blame themselves for their condition.

Cartoonist

(7,314 posts)
141. A general response
Fri Mar 6, 2015, 09:35 PM
Mar 2015

A lot of issues have been raised here. Rather than reply to each item, I will try to address a few.

First and foremost, these kids will not suffer from a bad education elsewhere. As Trotsky pointed out, Marin is very wealthy and our schools have all the modern conveniences. We also have plenty of other private schools that offer eclectic curriculums. They just don't offer that religious bullshit, which is why I am so happy for these kids.

I can't denigrate the quality of education offered by Catholic schools. I attended one for seven years. I made the transition to public school in Junior High without skipping a beat. I do regret having spent at least one hour a day studying all that religious BS. And I resent the fact that I was forced to attend church EVERY day. I consider that child abuse.

One poster tried to score points by remarking about the number of MBA's and PHD's their religious school produced. I am more concerned about how many of them graduated from the superstition and myths they were forced to swallow.

About that crucifix on the wall. Pinto noted that in his school, there was a crucifix in every room, also a picture of the current pope. I remember seeing this swastika, er, I mean this logo:

A couple of posters thought nothing of it. Just typical Catholic decor. They miss the point. It's called reinforcement, or indoctrination, or more accurately, brainwashing. Just look at how effective it was on them. Kids in that environment were never able to be free of the ever present dogma they were forced to respect. They had a dead guy looking over their shoulder in every room. This is the world they were forced to acknowledge and obey. This is why it is so important that our public schools be free of this shit. No crucifixes, no graphics of the Ten Commandments, no creche. Stop fucking with kid's minds.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Another One Bites the Dus...