Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
Related: About this forumNew “religious freedom” bill in Georgia has nothing to do with religion
1/14/16 11:45am
by Jon Green
Lawmakers in Georgia will soon consider a new bill that would let businesses and non-profits adopt straights-only policies for services relating to any matrimonial ceremony. From the Atlanta Journal-Constitution:
House Bill 756 would allow business owners to cite religious beliefs in refusing goods or services for a matrimonial ceremony a blunt assessment of conservatives outrage after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in June state prohibitions on same-sex marriage to be unconstitutional.
Like religious freedom bills that have come before it, HB 756 carves out areas of public activity in which the government must cede its regulatory authority to the discriminatory whims of private citizens. Unlike most of these earlier bills, however, HB 756 is narrowly tailored to only carve out such an exception for one specific type of public activity: selling goods and services relating to marriage ceremonies.
In most cases, crafting a bill with a narrower focus than the broader policy that inspired it is seen as a nod to the authors interest in conciliation or compromise. This isnt one of those cases. Religious freedom bills that just so happen to allow businesses to refuse service to same-sex couples at least carry the stated purpose of protecting, well, religious freedom. Anti-gay florists, bakers and photographers right to discriminate against same-sex couples is clearly the motivating factor behind these bills, but at least they theoretically apply to other situations in which religious citizens interests have reasonable conflicts with secular government regulations.
Broad legislation like the so-called First Amendment Defense Act currently pending in the House may be cruel and draconian and antithetical to the First Amendments establishment of the boundaries between Church and State, but that kind of legislation is value-neutral in the same way that voter ID laws are race-neutral.
http://americablog.com/2016/01/religious-freedom-bill-georgia-nothing-to-do-with-religion.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 847 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New “religious freedom” bill in Georgia has nothing to do with religion (Original Post)
rug
Jan 2016
OP
CurtEastPoint
(18,639 posts)1. Yes, we have NO problem here in GA that need addressing.
Goddamn Baptists.
xfundy
(5,105 posts)2. Southern Batshits, no doubt.