Religion
Related: About this forumThis church harasses women
From the article:
Once a month, St. Patrick's Basilica in New York City interrupts its service to march parishioners three blocks down the street to the Planned Parenthood's Margaret Sanger Center.
To read more:
https://socialistworker.org/2018/02/08/this-church-harasses-women
PJMcK
(22,031 posts)While I can't understand why a church would engage in such hateful behavior, don't they have a First Amendment right to peacefully demonstrate and voice their objection to abortion?
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)a Constitutional right. If they block entrances, or block people from entering, they are not engaging in speech, but in action.
PJMcK
(22,031 posts)Do they take the illegal actions you've suggested? In the article, it says the "church whose members regularly harass women..." A little later it states, "The group then accosts patients entering the clinic..." Later still, it says, "...anti-choicers speak to patients and physically grab them." Because the article was written by a someone who was part of the pro-choice protest, the hyperbole is suspect.
If the pro-lifers "grab them," it's assault and they could press charges. If they're simply chanting at the patients, they're really just very rude. I would ask the church members if they could show me in their bible where Jesus tells them to behave this way.
This article is more of an opinion piece than a journalistic report. And just to be clear, I'm pro-choice and consider abortion rights-- and all other personal medical decisions-- to be retained by each person for their own decisions.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)to protests. He would "talk" to the women using the loudspeaker as a way of harassing. When asked, he claimed to be speaking to the crowd. He also instructed his followers to link arms and physically block the entrances.
And yes, it is an opinion piece, but the tactics described are quite common among these groups.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)Time and place restrictions are not unheard of. You have a right to voice your opinion. You might not have the right to intimidate people--intentionally or otherwise--while they're walking into a medical clinic. Ultimately, it is up to the courts, but it is my personal opinion that they should not be allowed to assemble within a block of that clinic.
PJMcK
(22,031 posts)Also, please note that I said "peacefully." Assaulting or intimidating people requires police intervention.
msongs
(67,395 posts)guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)There are 'true believers' on both sides of this issue!
Brilliant to take it away from the clinic and drop it on the church's door step for a taste of their own medicine!
Mariana
(14,854 posts)"Who on earth supports unfettered abortion as a political position?" - yallerdawg
https://www.democraticunderground.com/1218259249#post35
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)"Advocate and support all the alternatives for birth control to reduce abortion - but guarantee a woman's inviolable right to choose."
The sentence I wrote prior...
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)If my memory is correct.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)There is that problem/situation/reality that cannot be really addressed. How to reconcile the 2 contradictory memes.
Mariana
(14,854 posts)or their would-be oppressors, as the case may be?
Civil rights for people of color and proponents of segregation:
There are 'true believers' on both sides of this issue!
Fundies and LBGT people who want equal rights:
There are 'true believers' on both sides of this issue!
Muslims persecuting Christians in the Middle East:
There are 'true believers' on both sides of this issue!
Etc.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)Since I said 'true believers' in the context of the discussion we are having related to this OP and thread.