Creation Science

[Cartoonist]

Yeah, there is such a thing.

http://www.icr.org/article/10456/

Long, long, long article. It talks about oxygen content in the atmosphere, nucleotides, and many, many, many other scientific stuff to discredit evolution.

What the article doesn't do is explain who created God. The article's summary:

Only an all-wise and omnipotent Creator could have been responsible for the miracle of life’s origins and the diversity and complexity of its amazing systems.

[Thyla]

1. When the science is wrong

It ceases to be science.

[LongTomH]

2. Creation Science. .......

Compassionate Conservativism...
Military Intelligence. ....
Business Ethics....
and Jumbo Shrimp

Make sense?

[Cuthbert Allgood]

3. ...

[DetlefK]

4. Wait, why aren't scientists allowed to use the same arguments as believers???

"You can't disprove God!"


Okay, the article expressly states that the probability for life forming from non-life is extremely small. BUT IT'S NOT ZERO. The odds for life forming spontaneously are extremely small. BUT THEY ARE NOT ZERO.


Congratulations! With that whole article they have not only failed to prove Creationism, they have also failed to disprove abiotic genesis of life. Really impressive.


Oh btw, it seems the article only deals with equilibrium-thermodynamics. One branch of the most recent research on the origins of life concerns non-equilibrium-thermodynamics.(e.g. during a meteor-impact) Which is cool, because outside of a thermodynamic equilibrium you can do "impossible" stuff like destroying entropy.

[gibraltar72]

5. Sciencey.

[Girard442]

6. Theres a thriving industry telling fundies what they want to hear.

Apparently the only qualifications are to be able to put words on paper and have absolutely no shame.

[nil desperandum]

7. Stormtrooper

Ganesha finds your lack of faith disturbing....