Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cartoonist

(7,316 posts)
Mon Jul 30, 2018, 04:42 PM Jul 2018

The Potomac Declaration

Every person everywhere has the right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion. Every person has the right to hold any faith or belief, or none at all, and enjoys the freedom to change faith.

https://www.state.gov/j/drl/irf/religiousfreedom/284554.htm

Both Pompeo and Pence were party to this. Go figure. I expected something else from that ministerial they held last week.

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Potomac Declaration (Original Post) Cartoonist Jul 2018 OP
Their motivation is to support Christian proselytizing in non-Christian countries Major Nikon Jul 2018 #1
This would be more convincing if they didn't claim " a God-given human right" muriel_volestrangler Aug 2018 #2
Religious freedom only works one way for them Major Nikon Aug 2018 #3
Something different Cartoonist Aug 2018 #4
I disagree Major Nikon Aug 2018 #5
Would you agree Cartoonist Aug 2018 #6
More precisely you have to overcome blasphemy laws Major Nikon Aug 2018 #7
Nothing wrong with ending blasphemy laws Cartoonist Aug 2018 #8
Nothing in the declaration says anything about ending blasphemy laws Major Nikon Aug 2018 #9
From the Potomac Plan of Action Cartoonist Aug 2018 #10
The ministerial has exactly zero authority in the State Dept Major Nikon Aug 2018 #11

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
1. Their motivation is to support Christian proselytizing in non-Christian countries
Mon Jul 30, 2018, 05:40 PM
Jul 2018

Meanwhile Pence and Trump are funneling millions of dollars to organizations who buy bibles for proselytizing under the veil of "humanitarian" aid.

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/asoka-bandarage/proselytism-or-a-global-e_b_6779640.html

muriel_volestrangler

(101,308 posts)
2. This would be more convincing if they didn't claim " a God-given human right"
Wed Aug 1, 2018, 07:45 AM
Aug 2018

deriving your rights from a monotheistic claim is not a good start to a freedom of religion claim.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
3. Religious freedom only works one way for them
Wed Aug 1, 2018, 09:32 AM
Aug 2018

If you read the other thread, you’ll see that their true motivation is to weaponize Christianity.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/1218290029

It’s really the same story repeated throughout recorded history. You force other countries to accept your religion and you use that influence for a political and social advantage. Then they can’t understand why countries like China place restrictions on proselytizing.

Cartoonist

(7,316 posts)
4. Something different
Wed Aug 1, 2018, 11:35 AM
Aug 2018

I think Jeff is doing his own thing unrelated to the ministerial. Or, they may become intertwined later.

They announced a plan of action that is similar to what the UN came up with. Namely, a ban on blasphemy laws. The usual countries balk as usual.

States should promote religious freedom and bring their laws and policies into line with international human rights norms regarding freedom of religion or belief. In that spirit, states should work to:

Protect freedom of thought, conscience, religion, or belief and ensure individuals can freely change beliefs, or not believe, without penalty or fear of violence, and encourage the repeal of provisions penalizing or discriminating against individuals for leaving or changing their religion or belief.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
5. I disagree
Wed Aug 1, 2018, 12:43 PM
Aug 2018

This has been the GOP game plan at least since the Bush administration. So while NATO may be genuinely in favor of religious freedom, the zealots are simply going to channel that effort for their own agenda, which is exactly the opposite of religious freedom.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
7. More precisely you have to overcome blasphemy laws
Wed Aug 1, 2018, 01:02 PM
Aug 2018

Blasphemy laws primarily target those who want to proselytize. Those who simply want to practice their own religion or lack thereof are seldom bothered by them.

So it's really more about the freedom to promote a specific religion.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
9. Nothing in the declaration says anything about ending blasphemy laws
Wed Aug 1, 2018, 01:21 PM
Aug 2018

They aren't trying to end blasphemy laws, but to keep them from being enforced against Christians.

Do you think the current state department is going to defend someone promoting atheism, or an atheist protesting theocracy? We can't even get our own justice department to enforce the establishment clause.

Cartoonist

(7,316 posts)
10. From the Potomac Plan of Action
Wed Aug 1, 2018, 02:11 PM
Aug 2018
https://www.state.gov/j/drl/irf/religiousfreedom/284555.htm

Repeal anti-blasphemy laws, which are inherently subjective, and often contribute to sectarianism and violent extremism. Enforcement of such laws unduly inhibits the exercise of the rights to freedoms of religion, belief, and expression and leads to other human rights violations or abuses.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
11. The ministerial has exactly zero authority in the State Dept
Wed Aug 1, 2018, 05:09 PM
Aug 2018

They are little more than a collection of almost exclusively religious people rounded up to add a bow on a package that has a clear purpose. When the State Dept actually takes action to defend persecuted atheists, I might have confidence in their intentions. I won’t be waiting up for that to happen.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»The Potomac Declaration