Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
Related: About this forumFormer NOM Chair: How Conservatives Moved The ‘Religious Freedom’ Goalposts On Marriage Equality
By Zack Ford on Jul 19, 2012 at 5:12 pm
Robert George is a significant though not often visible force within the anti-equality movement. As the founding chairman of the National Organization for Marriage, co-author of the anti-gay Manhattan Declaration, and a board member of the homophobic and Islamophobic Bradley Foundation, his fingerprints can be found throughout efforts to oppose the freedom to marry. Today at the Witherspoon Institute, another anti-gay think tank with which George is affiliated, he took time to pontificate on the issue of same-sex marriage and religious freedom, explaining exactly how those opposed to equality (supporters of conjugal marriage) shifted the goalposts on the issue:
The fundamental error made by some supporters of conjugal marriage was and is, I believe, to imagine that a grand bargain could be struck with their opponents: We will accept the legal redefinition of marriage; you will respect our right to act on our consciences without penalty, discrimination, or civil disabilities of any type. Same-sex partners will get marriage licenses, but no one will be forced for any reason to recognize those marriages or suffer discrimination or disabilities for declining to recognize them. There was never any hope of such a bargain being accepted.
Perhaps parts of such a bargain would be accepted by liberal forces temporarily for strategic or tactical reasons, as part of the political project of getting marriage redefined; but guarantees of religious liberty and non-discrimination for people who cannot in conscience accept same-sex marriage could then be eroded and eventually removed. After all, full equality requires that no quarter be given to the bigots who want to engage in discrimination (people with a separate but equal mindset) in the name of their retrograde religious beliefs. Dignitarian harm must be opposed as resolutely as more palpable forms of harm.
Perhaps parts of such a bargain would be accepted by liberal forces temporarily for strategic or tactical reasons, as part of the political project of getting marriage redefined; but guarantees of religious liberty and non-discrimination for people who cannot in conscience accept same-sex marriage could then be eroded and eventually removed. After all, full equality requires that no quarter be given to the bigots who want to engage in discrimination (people with a separate but equal mindset) in the name of their retrograde religious beliefs. Dignitarian harm must be opposed as resolutely as more palpable forms of harm.
Note the conflation George makes between whether or not religious organizations have to recognize same-sex marriage versus whether society as a whole does. Surely hes not so narrow-minded as to believe that same-sex couples wanted to get married just so that nobody would recognize their unions! Indeed, the whole goal of marriage equality is ensuring that same-sex couples have equal access to both the legal and societal benefits and protections for their relationship and family. Its quite pompous to believe that gays and lesbians ever offered any sort of bargain in which respect was sacrificed for the mere opportunity to sign a piece of paper.
http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2012/07/19/551101/former-nom-chair-explains-how-religious-conservatives-moved-the-religious-freedom-goalposts-on-marriage-equality/?mobile=nc
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 917 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Former NOM Chair: How Conservatives Moved The ‘Religious Freedom’ Goalposts On Marriage Equality (Original Post)
rug
Jul 2012
OP
cbayer
(146,218 posts)1. What a jackass.
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)2. The Roman subversive.