Religion
Related: About this forumLiberal Christian vs. Conservative Atheist
September 24, 2012
Each of us has many different aspects to our individual identity, and even those we share may be more or less central to us. Perhaps we both consider ourselves environmentalists, but environmentalism is more central to your identity than it is to mine. Or perhaps we both consider ourselves proponents of reproductive rights, but this particular cause is more central to my identity than it is to yours. You get the idea.
I suspect that this is one of the reasons we might expect to see conflict occurring even within groups that agree on a big issue or two. Conflict can come about, in part, because we do not share the same priorities. I might stress the importance of something you find fairly trivial while devoting insufficient attention to something you consider critical.
I found myself pondering the following question recently:
The liberal Christian would almost certainly be a better fit with my stance on many political issues than the conservative atheist. But of course, the conservative atheist would not be a victim of the sort of superstition afflicting the liberal Christian. So who would I choose if I had to pick one?
http://www.atheistrev.com/2012/09/liberal-christian-vs-conservative.html
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)Or is that just who they happen to be and have been labeled as such by the author?
rug
(82,333 posts)Who would you vote for?
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)That's not a question to me.
But when the really tough question is asked, a la U of Minn, and people are asked to choose between a believer and an atheist of the same political stance, people vote for the believer.
rug
(82,333 posts)I don't think it's posible that two candidates would be identical except for belief or nonbelief.
But statistics would indicate that a good number of politicians that declare they are believers actually aren't and are probably not saying they are atheists because of the fall out. And U of M says they would be right. People that voted for them would not do so again. Which is frustrating.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)'I don't think it's posible that two candidates would be identical except for belief or nonbelief.'
Please state your reasons why
rug
(82,333 posts)different voting record, different baseball team, different dog.
How many more do you want?
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)But assuming that the standard generally applied to "liberal" and "conservative" remain true, the liberal would get my vote by default.
dimbear
(6,271 posts)One more won't hurt.
I suppose when I'm called up for judgment before anti-St. Peter I'll have to answer for it.
2ndAmForComputers
(3,527 posts)Evoman
(8,040 posts)I don't trust politicians that wear them. Especially if they twirl their mustache.
And fucking bow ties. Those are for douchebags. Fuck bow ties.
jeepnstein
(2,631 posts)Silent3
(15,181 posts)Oregonian
(209 posts)Equally interesting.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)I once supported a candidate for the House because I knew him professionally and felt he would advance some causes within my profession that I was deeply invested and interested in.
As it turns out, he won and became one of the most despicable Republicans currently in the Congress.
I deeply regret having supported him in any way whatsoever, but at the time, my priorities were very clear to me. Although I knew he was a Republican, I made the erroneous assumption that he would be moderate and focus on the issues we shared.
I was absolutely wrong.
MineralMan
(146,284 posts)Yes, there are conservative atheists. I would not vote for such a person. I vote for people with liberal viewpoints, and do not take their religious beliefs into consideration at all. It is not beliefs, but actions that matter.
Oregonian
(209 posts)But religious or no, our constitution forbids enacting laws on the basis of religion or irreligion. Voting for any "conservative" in this day and age would be tantamount to voting for bigfoot anyway.
dmallind
(10,437 posts)Since the number of acknowledged atheist national candidates with even a minuscule hope of winning is 1, any of us outside Pete Stark's district already does vote for liberal believers - the vast majority Christian - every single time, and I don't recall any hint of demurral,
Even if we pretend a conservative atheist had a snowball's chance in hell of getting the nomination for a meaningful candidacy, I can't imagine a non-conservative atheist (the vast majority of us, on or off DU) even giving it a second's thought. I sure as hell wouldn't.
Ontology isn't up for vote. Religious freedom hinges on the courts not the legislative or executive branches, thankfully (for now).
While we don't vote for SCOTUS it's possible I'd give it some thought if we did, depending on how conservative the atheist and how theocratic the liberal, but doubt it would be much even then.
LeftishBrit
(41,205 posts)I'm a left-wing atheist; and NO WAY would I vote for a Tory or other right-winger just because they were an atheist. In the UK we do have some Tories who are open atheists, and I wouldn't vote for any of them!
We should defeat the Right, rather than fussing about which church people do or don't go to!
BTW my preferred candidate for Prime Minister is a Labourite who happens to be an atheist (Ed Miliband).