Religion
Related: About this forumVa. panel Oks measure to allow prayer, religious activities in all public places
By Fredrick Kunkle,
The Washington Post
Tuesday, January 29, 7:24 PM
RICHMOND A Senate committee in the Virginia General Assembly on Tuesday narrowly endorsed a measure to amend the states Bill of Rights to require all public places and schools to accommodate prayer or other religious activity and allow students to be dismissed from assignments or presentations that conflict with their religious beliefs.
The resolution sponsored by Republican Sens. William M. Stanley, Jr. (Franklin) and Charles W. Bill Carrico (Grayson) would guarantee public officials, students and others the right to conduct religious activities as long as they were not disruptive and no one was coerced to participate.
Stanley told the panel that the measure was intended to ensure that people of all religions would not be penalized for exercising their right to religious beliefs. To illustrate, he said that a Muslim high school student could ask to be excused from dissecting a fetal pig in biology class, because their religion views those animals as unclean, without affecting his or her grades.
- snip -
But Claire Guthrie Gastanaga, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union, said that the bill, if passed, would be an unconstitutional establishment of religion.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/va-politics/va-panel-oks-measure-to-allow-prayer-religious-activities-in-all-public-places/2013/01/29/674a7d04-6a6f-11e2-95b3-272d604a10a3_story.html
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)Fortinbras Armstrong
(4,473 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Prayer should have reasonable accommodations. If a person doesn't want to dissect an animal then they shouldn't have to. I believe there are vegetarians and vegans that would be just as horrified over dissecting a pig. Of course, in some cases frogs are available, that is what we had in my science class, that settles the issue for Muslims I believe, but not vegetarian/vegans.
I still think that all the religious stuff is nonsense. But, it's also nonsense to say that having a quiet space for prayer is establishment of religion especially if it is a space that can be used by pagans, Buddhists, Muslims, Christians, or even atheists for quiet meditation.
dballance
(5,756 posts)Fetal Pigs were dissected by the advanced biology class that was typically only available to seniors. There was always accommodation for students that had religious or deeply personal beliefs so that they could opt out of dissecting the pig. They had to complete some alternative set of coursework to substitute for it though. They didn't just get a pass to go sit in the cafeteria.
This bill is RW showboating as has been posted. I believe the 1st Amendment already covers what they're trying to do. I'm pretty certain the threat of the ACLU has already tamed most cities and towns to the point they will permit religious groups of all religions.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)if they are then well kind of goes along with what I was saying. It's no big deal to allow people to pray. And it's no big deal to allow people to not dissect pigs if they are not willing for religious or ethical reasons. I do wonder though what the motives are. I don't think it can be to establish a religion because all accommodations would have to be for any and all religions.
dballance
(5,756 posts)Their noon and afternoon prayer times would seem to likely fall during the school day. Now, how you implement that without disrupting class and figuring out how to deal with them missing some instruction I don't know. I'll let smarter people do that.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)I am with you on that though, letting someone else figure it out.
tama
(9,137 posts)on the altar of "science". Strange ritual in American schools, cruel and dehumanizing. It does not teach compassion and respect towards all living beings, it teaches the opposite.
http://www.nytimes.com/1997/05/29/us/frogs-best-friends-students-who-won-t-dissect-them.html
msongs
(67,394 posts)struggle4progress
(118,278 posts)Fortinbras Armstrong
(4,473 posts)A quote from a fundamentalist textbook brochure at What do Christian fundamentalists have against set theory?
"Unlike the "modern math" theorists, who believe that mathematics is a creation of man and thus arbitrary and relative, A Beka Book teaches that the laws of mathematics are a creation of God and thus absolute....A Beka Book provides attractive, legible, and workable traditional mathematics texts that are not burdened with modern theories such as set theory." ABeka.com
That's right, at least some fundamentalists disapprove of set theory on religious grounds.
Georg Cantor proved that there are multiple infinite sets. This disturbs certain fundamentalists, who feel that this is an affront to their beliefs. As one of them put it in the article I cited, "There is only one infinity, and that is God."
Fundamentalists believe that the Bible is literally true, that sincere adoption of the Gospel message is the key to virtue in this life and salvation in the next, and rejection of any part of it will lead to the fires of hell. Anything which contradicts their beliefs is inspired by Satan. Doubt is strongly discouraged.
Unfortunately for the fundamentalist viewpoint, the universe itself does not support it. The universe is far older than 10 thousand years; creatures, includimg humans, evolved from other creatures; there was not a world-wide flood; Joshua did not make the sun stand still and so on.
In order to accept the fundamentalist view, one must reject biology, astronomy, geology, much of physics, some significant parts of chemistry and even mathematics.
Another place you might go is Conservapedia, the world's stupidest wiki. Andrew Schlafly, the man who founded and runs it, has a strange objection to things such as imaginary numbers (which is odd, considering that he boasts of his bachelors degree in electrical engineering), the equation e = mc**2, and the proof by contradiction.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)when they talk about this.
Not sure what to make of it.