Science
Related: About this forumWarp Drive May Be More Feasible Than Thought, Scientists Say
HOUSTON A warp drive to achieve faster-than-light travel a concept popularized in television's Star Trek may not be as unrealistic as once thought, scientists say.
A warp drive would manipulate space-time itself to move a starship, taking advantage of a loophole in the laws of physics that prevent anything from moving faster than light. A concept for a real-life warp drive was suggested in 1994 by Mexican physicist Miguel Alcubierre, however subsequent calculations found that such a device would require prohibitive amounts of energy.
Now physicists say that adjustments can be made to the proposed warp drive that would enable it to run on significantly less energy, potentially brining the idea back from the realm of science fiction into science.
"There is hope," Harold "Sonny" White of NASA's Johnson Space Center said here Friday (Sept. 14) at the 100 Year Starship Symposium, a meeting to discuss the challenges of interstellar spaceflight.
http://news.yahoo.com/warp-drive-may-more-feasible-thought-scientists-161301109.html
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)hollysmom
(5,946 posts)TlalocW
(15,378 posts)Talking about what had come to past that Trek predicted, what their mistakes were and how they covered them (Heisenberg Compensator on the transporters to get around the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle - How do they work? Very well, thank you for asking), and problems with trying to implement it all interspersed with amusing scenes from the Star Trek franchise. One scientist explained in simple terms the problems with the accelerations and decelerations of starships would lead to any passengers being turned into chunky human salsa.
TlalocW
ahg
(64 posts)progressoid
(49,961 posts)GreenPartyVoter
(72,377 posts)strictly contrived in order to speak allegorically about fossil fuels in our day and age, or was there ever any scientific fact to that I wonder? Considering we are still trying to figure out if warp drive can be done, I guess we're not at a place where we can know about potential hazards from it.
Shitty Mitty
(138 posts)Most TNG shows were in some way
Confusious
(8,317 posts)Warpy
(111,222 posts)and ion drive. I guess warp drive isn't that far in the future.
The transporters and replicators, though? Those are just plain silly. 3D printers don't grab random molecules out of thin air, they use layers of built up plastic.
LongTomH
(8,636 posts)As noted in the links, stories on warp drive are popping up all over the net. The Centauri Dreams article did quote some experts who remain skeptical:
But it is interesting that these solutions exist. I think, its going to take more imagination and further discoveries before something can be made of this.
There are more warp drive articles on the Icarus Interstellar website: Daydreaming Beyond the Solar Sytem with Warp Field Mechanics and Defending the Interstellar Vision. Icarus Interstellar and Centauri Dreams are great resources for anyone interested in interstellar flight, exoplanets, SETI, etc.
Backstory on this: Back in the 90s, I sat in on a talk by Marc Millis, at an International Space Development Conference. Marc is the former project manager of NASA's Breakthrough Propulsion study at the NASA Glenn Research Center near Cleveland. The topic of his talk was "Warp Drive When," which is also the title of Marc's webpage for lay readers. His Powerpoint presentation was illustrated with slides of the Starship Enterprise, and images illustrating the way the Alcudierre Warp Drive would literally warp spacetime around the spacecraft. Note that the Warp Drive on the vessel in the the above jpeg image is in a ring around the vessel, not in two warp pods like the enterprise.
Marc is now affiliated with the Tau Zero Foundation (Centauri Dreams is their news forum) and Icarus International.
bananas
(27,509 posts)LongTomH
(8,636 posts)For myself, I need to spend more time on science sites. I think I've developed a DU addiction.
Shitty Mitty
(138 posts)We'd be freakin' everywhere!