Science
Related: About this forumMysterious New Gully Spotted on Mars
A new gully has appeared on a sloped crater wall on Mars. The channel, which was absent from images in November 2010 but showed up in a May 2013 photo, does not appear to have been formed by water. Exactly what caused this Red Planet rivulet remains a mystery.
The winding gully seems to have poured out from an existing ribbon channel in a crater in Mars Terra Sirenum region. The leading hypothesis on how the gully formed is that debris flowed downslope from an alcove and eroded a new channel. Though it looks water-carved, the gully is much more likely to have been formed when carbon dioxide frost accumulated on the slope and grew heavy enough to avalanche down and drag material down with it.
Because the pair of images, taken by the orbiting HiRISE camera onboard NASAs Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, were taken more than a year apart, scientists dont know in exactly which season the new gully formed. Similar activity has been seen to occur during the Martian winter at temperatures too cold for water, which is why researchers think carbon dioxide is a likelier cause. While the formation of these gullies on Mars is well documented, scientists have yet to work out exactly how they work.
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2014/03/mars-gully-not-water/
Stargazer09
(2,132 posts)But it looks like the gully is there in the first picture, possibly frosted over or filled with loose sedimentary material.
Very interesting!
CFLDem
(2,083 posts)but I'm 100% sure you're correct.
proReality
(1,628 posts)The angle and lighting are different, but the groove looks much deeper than before (it was obviously there before), and it doesn't seem like the angle is far enough off to account for such a deep appearance now. Some debris may have somehow shaken out. Has anyone ever ruled out earthquakes on Mars?
Stargazer09
(2,132 posts)Mars has the capability for earthquakes (marsquakes?), so it's possible that something happened to open the chasm.
I had previously read that Mars was geologically boring under the surface, but maybe that's changing:
http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/ucla-scientist-discovers-plate-237303.aspx
proReality
(1,628 posts)smitty
(584 posts)so I cannot comment with any authority. The only thing I note is that the picture on right appears to be in sharper focus with slightly different lighting.
ffr
(22,669 posts)grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)rocktivity
(44,575 posts)rocktivity
nikto
(3,284 posts)Then well-paid work crews cleared it out.
Union Labor on Mars.
Bucky
(53,993 posts)They're hell on the terrain