Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Quackers

(2,256 posts)
Sat Jul 16, 2016, 03:01 PM Jul 2016

The mysterious syndrome impairing astronauts’ sight

In 2005, astronaut John Phillips took a break from his work on the International Space Station and looked out the window at Earth. He was about halfway through a mission that had begun in April and would end in October.

When he gazed down at the planet, Earth was blurry. He couldn’t focus on it clearly. That was strange — his vision had always been 20/20. He wondered: Was his eyesight getting worse?

“I’m not sure if I reported that to the ground,” he said. “I think I didn’t. I thought it would be something that would just go away, and fix itself when I got to Earth.”

It didn’t go away.

During Phillips’s post-flight physical, NASA found that his vision had gone from 20/20 to 20/100 in six months.

More at link:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/the-mysterious-syndrome-impairing-astronauts-eyesight/2016/07/09/f20fb9a6-41f1-11e6-88d0-6adee48be8bc_story.html


Looks like they're saying it's due to fluid build-up in the skull that would normally be pulled into the extremities by gravity. If we hope to conduct long-term missions, it would seem we need to develop artificial gravity for the ships. Maybe something along the line of centrifugal force?

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The mysterious syndrome impairing astronauts’ sight (Original Post) Quackers Jul 2016 OP
No kidding, a lot of body systems depend on gravity Warpy Jul 2016 #1
The dream of mankind conquering and occupying space is crumbling in the face of reality. Binkie The Clown Jul 2016 #2
Machines will have to do it for us. thucythucy Jul 2016 #3
Nonsense. bananas Jul 2016 #7
Maybe not, but... Binkie The Clown Jul 2016 #8
Every sentence in your post is wrong. bananas Jul 2016 #10
Every sentence in your post is wrong. Binkie The Clown Jul 2016 #12
Right, because you know the future. GaYellowDawg Jul 2016 #20
Centripetal motion Brother Buzz Jul 2016 #4
To produce one G Stryst Jul 2016 #5
Well, maybe they could just spool it up until they find the level of gravity that suits them Brother Buzz Jul 2016 #6
We'll played, Brother SCantiGOP Jul 2016 #11
Is that assuming a 0G environment? Quackers Jul 2016 #13
At 24 rpm, the Gravitron produces a centrifugal force equivalent to three times the force of gravity Brother Buzz Jul 2016 #14
Good question. Quackers Jul 2016 #15
Even on earth, a carousel employs a remarkably puny motor Brother Buzz Jul 2016 #16
Here's a good overview of the subject. Stryst Jul 2016 #18
Well, it looks like NASA needs to recruit Gravitron carny workers.... Brother Buzz Jul 2016 #19
All you need to know about spinning spacecraft... hunter Jul 2016 #17
just fake it jakeXT Jul 2016 #9

Warpy

(111,245 posts)
1. No kidding, a lot of body systems depend on gravity
Sat Jul 16, 2016, 03:06 PM
Jul 2016

from circulation to renal function to bone integrity and now eyesight. My best guess says that there would be severe neurological impairment after a prolonged mission (like that trip to Mars they're talking about) from the maldistribution of cerebrospinal fluid wiping out central nervous system tissue.

In other words, a lot more studies have to be done and ways to circumvent problems found before anyone is ready to leave this rock.

Binkie The Clown

(7,911 posts)
2. The dream of mankind conquering and occupying space is crumbling in the face of reality.
Sat Jul 16, 2016, 03:22 PM
Jul 2016

We will never leave this planet in any meaningful or sustained manner. We just need to adjust to that fact.

thucythucy

(8,047 posts)
3. Machines will have to do it for us.
Sat Jul 16, 2016, 04:55 PM
Jul 2016

The deep space planetary probes have always excited me more than close earth orbit manned flights, Juno being the latest example.

There's no end to what we can do with unmanned vehicles.

bananas

(27,509 posts)
7. Nonsense.
Sat Jul 16, 2016, 10:00 PM
Jul 2016

There are a number of people who've made multiple trips to the ISS with a clean bill of health each time.

This problem only affects some people, and we already have some physiological clues - for example it affects women less than men. So we'll likely find ways of preventing it as we learn more.

Worst case, some people will need contact lenses. It's not going to stop anyway from going.

This is not a show-stopper at all.

Binkie The Clown

(7,911 posts)
8. Maybe not, but...
Sun Jul 17, 2016, 12:44 AM
Jul 2016

the inevitable collapse of industrial civilization is. Infinite growth on a finite planet cannot, and will not be sustained. Yet our economic system requires continual growth or it crashes. Since our economy depends on something that cannot be sustained, then it must, inevitably crash. Hard. We will run out of resources, and the economic power to ever exploit space in any more than a token manner.

The only thing that can, and probably will, prevent the economy from self-destructing is if climate change and loss of human habitat kills us off first. Either way, we are not going into space. Man set foot on the moon once, but never will again.

GaYellowDawg

(4,446 posts)
20. Right, because you know the future.
Sun Jul 24, 2016, 01:24 AM
Jul 2016

Or, more likely, someone who is a lot brighter than you and not such a pessimist will figure out a solution.

Just wow.

Brother Buzz

(36,416 posts)
4. Centripetal motion
Sat Jul 16, 2016, 07:13 PM
Jul 2016

Stanley Kubrick demonstrated how wonderfully it worked for us in 1968. Silly me, I just assumed they incorporated this simple physics law into the space station.

Stryst

(714 posts)
5. To produce one G
Sat Jul 16, 2016, 09:22 PM
Jul 2016

You need a ring with a diameter of around a thousand meters spinning .9 times per minute. Or you can cut the radius to just 300 meters (give or take twenty on either side) and spin that ring two full rotations per minute. Of all the sci-fi, I think that Babyon 5 got it closest, and even then the station doesn't rotate fast enough.

Brother Buzz

(36,416 posts)
6. Well, maybe they could just spool it up until they find the level of gravity that suits them
Sat Jul 16, 2016, 09:38 PM
Jul 2016

Perhaps blend/puree might be a good starting point.

Quackers

(2,256 posts)
13. Is that assuming a 0G environment?
Mon Jul 18, 2016, 02:26 PM
Jul 2016

Since gravitational force is created by all things that have mass, then increasing mass should help as well. I'm just not sure what the calculation is to figure out the amount of mass to gravity ratio in a 0G environment at variable rotation speeds inside the craft.

Brother Buzz

(36,416 posts)
14. At 24 rpm, the Gravitron produces a centrifugal force equivalent to three times the force of gravity
Mon Jul 18, 2016, 04:13 PM
Jul 2016

and that's defeating 1G. Would it be, like, 4G's in a weightless environment, or is their some fuzzy math involved? Notice the dude in the center, he appears to remain in a comfortable 1G environment.

Quackers

(2,256 posts)
15. Good question.
Mon Jul 18, 2016, 07:07 PM
Jul 2016

It wouldn't be a constant either depending on your distance from the center. One nice thing about such an idea in space is that friction would by minimilized thus it shouldn't require that much power to sustain once started.

Brother Buzz

(36,416 posts)
16. Even on earth, a carousel employs a remarkably puny motor
Mon Jul 18, 2016, 07:59 PM
Jul 2016

The wimpy electric motor necessitates a slow start but that is rather desirable, if you know what I mean.

Brother Buzz

(36,416 posts)
19. Well, it looks like NASA needs to recruit Gravitron carny workers....
Tue Jul 19, 2016, 11:09 AM
Jul 2016

they appear to be immune to the disorienting effects of artificial gravity. Perhaps future space travelers need to spend a summer with a traveling carnival.

That being said, that was a good video explaining the pitfalls of artificial gravity.

hunter

(38,311 posts)
17. All you need to know about spinning spacecraft...
Tue Jul 19, 2016, 01:23 AM
Jul 2016


AUTHOR: RHETT ALLAIN. RHETT ALLAIN SCIENCE DATE OF PUBLICATION: 08.25.15.
08.25.15
TIME OF PUBLICATION: 1:27 PM.
1:27 PM
HOW THAT SPINNING SPACECRAFT FROM THE MARTIAN WOULD WORK

In The Martian movie, astronauts travel to Mars in a large spacecraft called Hermes (also in the novel version). Since the trip to Mars will take a while, the humans need a nice way to stay in shape. Hermes, like many other spacecraft, has a section that spins to make a type of “artificial gravity.” Even though I’ve gone over this several times, let me do a super brief overview of the physics of a spinning spacecraft.

http://www.wired.com/2015/08/spinning-spacecraft-martian-work/


Personally, I'm a robot spacecraft kind of guy even though my grandfather was an Apollo Project engineer.

If humans ever get into space in any big way (which seems increasingly unlikely...) it will be as the guests of our artificial offspring, intelligent robots, or very extreme genetic engineering far beyond our present science.

Mars is a much harsher place than was portrayed in "The Martian."



Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»The mysterious syndrome i...