Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

63splitwindow

(2,657 posts)
Mon Aug 29, 2016, 09:37 PM Aug 2016

Not a Drill: SETI Is Investigating a Possible Extraterrestrial Signal From Deep Space

source: MSN News



" An international team of scientists from the Search For Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) are investigating mysterious signal spikes emitting from a 65 billion year-old star in the constellation Hercules–95 light years away from Earth. The implications are extraordinary and point to the possibility of a civilization far more advanced than our own.

The unusual signal was originally detected on May 15, 2015 by the Russian Academy of Science-operated RATAN-600 radio telescope in Zelenchukskaya, Russia but was kept secret from the international community. Interstellar space reporter Paul Gilster broke the story after the researchers quietly circulated a paper announcing the detection of “a strong signal in the direction of HD164595.”

The mysterious star’s designation is HD164595 and it’s considered to be sun-like in nature with a nearly identical metallic composition to our own star. So far, a single Neptune-like (but warmer) planet has been discovered in its orbit–HD 164595 b. But as Gilster explained, “there could, of course, be other planets still undetected in this system.”
...
..."

more at: http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/not-a-drill-seti-is-investigating-a-possible-extraterrestrial-signal-from-deep-space/ar-AAid9oY?OCID=ansmsnnews11

45 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Not a Drill: SETI Is Investigating a Possible Extraterrestrial Signal From Deep Space (Original Post) 63splitwindow Aug 2016 OP
Something got lost in translation VMA131Marine Aug 2016 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author 63splitwindow Aug 2016 #3
Oops, my bad. Don't know what the problem is. 63splitwindow Aug 2016 #4
exciting! rurallib Aug 2016 #2
6.3B years old, not 65B BadgerKid Aug 2016 #5
also 95 LY away is fairly close, in terms of our galactic neighborhood. Warren DeMontague Aug 2016 #18
if i pack in a hurry pscot Aug 2016 #30
Shhhhhhh! Don't say this too loudly! The religious people might lose their $hit! TheDebbieDee Aug 2016 #6
The ironic thing is that one of those extraterrestial beings MIGHT be their God. 63splitwindow Aug 2016 #7
The REAL irony for Christians is that if Jesus has returned... TheDebbieDee Aug 2016 #8
He would be branded a Lib and shunned. If he had ertraterrestial powers their asses would be grass. 63splitwindow Aug 2016 #9
R U say'n Kolob is orbiting HD164595? HereSince1628 Aug 2016 #11
I'm say'n the possibilities are infinite and beyond our limited comprehension. 63splitwindow Aug 2016 #12
Detected in Russia, eh? Buckeye_Democrat Aug 2016 #10
Disliking that the Russians sat on this for a year GoDawgs Aug 2016 #13
Looks like it they are not operating. Here is link to their website. 63splitwindow Aug 2016 #14
Too bad. China's FAST is finished but still shakedown & commissioning GoDawgs Aug 2016 #15
The obligatory... Binkie The Clown Aug 2016 #16
Yeah, I had to stop at 65 Billion year old star, too. Warren DeMontague Aug 2016 #17
Go to the source story where the age is correctly stated... 63splitwindow Aug 2016 #19
Yeah, I got that. Just find mainstream science reporting exasperating, that's all. Warren DeMontague Aug 2016 #23
So is "Independence Day: Resurgence" about to hit streaming? (n/t) Kennah Aug 2016 #20
Well, let's see. It was estimated in 2014 that there were roughly 70 billion trillion 63splitwindow Aug 2016 #21
Look around PJMcK Aug 2016 #29
A 6.5 billion old Sol would not be a good star to be home for life. longship Aug 2016 #22
we only have a sample size of one for life to go on, at this point, so we can't really say. Warren DeMontague Aug 2016 #24
Well, stellar evolution is more than a hunch. longship Aug 2016 #25
I'm not suggesting that we don't have enough data to know what happens to stars. Warren DeMontague Aug 2016 #26
Or, could the signal be a billion years old forgotmylogin Aug 2016 #27
According to the article, no, assuming they've got the right star as the source. Warren DeMontague Aug 2016 #28
An advanced civilization might move as its star brightened daleo Aug 2016 #39
But not likely. longship Aug 2016 #40
I Wonder Why magicnpoetry Aug 2016 #31
They get a lot of false positives, so they try to rule out a much a they can bananas Sep 2016 #44
IF they could pick up our radio... Thor_MN Aug 2016 #32
Don't you believe it is somewhat naive to rule out anything about "them" or their capabilities? 63splitwindow Aug 2016 #33
I think it's naive to believe that physics can somehow work differently. Thor_MN Aug 2016 #35
We no more understand the capabilities of beings millions of years more advanced than us 63splitwindow Aug 2016 #36
Trying to argue that you don't understand physics is hardly a winning tactic.... Thor_MN Aug 2016 #37
Claiming no know all there is to know about what we call physics and how it can be 63splitwindow Aug 2016 #38
"Claiming no know all there is to know" Huh? Thor_MN Aug 2016 #41
I am done with you. 63splitwindow Aug 2016 #42
Sounds good. Thor_MN Aug 2016 #43
It is on CNN frontpage now 63splitwindow Aug 2016 #34
We can't possibly imagine.. that a Russian Military satellite could confuse a Russian observatory Thor_MN Sep 2016 #45

VMA131Marine

(4,136 posts)
1. Something got lost in translation
Mon Aug 29, 2016, 09:41 PM
Aug 2016

The Universe is only about 13.8 billion years old so there is no way this star can be 65 billion years old. 6.5 billion, maybe, which would make it 2 billion years older than our own sun.

Update: the original source article quotes the age of the star as 6.3 billion years:

http://www.centauri-dreams.org/?p=36248

Response to VMA131Marine (Reply #1)

 

TheDebbieDee

(11,119 posts)
6. Shhhhhhh! Don't say this too loudly! The religious people might lose their $hit!
Mon Aug 29, 2016, 09:54 PM
Aug 2016

I believe that they've talked themselves into believing that any extra-terrestrials that turn up are demons cast out of heaven... And these demons, if found, need to be EXORCISED!

 

63splitwindow

(2,657 posts)
7. The ironic thing is that one of those extraterrestial beings MIGHT be their God.
Mon Aug 29, 2016, 09:58 PM
Aug 2016

There are more things in heaven and on earth Horatio...

 

TheDebbieDee

(11,119 posts)
8. The REAL irony for Christians is that if Jesus has returned...
Mon Aug 29, 2016, 10:12 PM
Aug 2016

he's been shut away in a mental health facility somewhere.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
11. R U say'n Kolob is orbiting HD164595?
Mon Aug 29, 2016, 11:24 PM
Aug 2016

For those who don't know... from Wiki: Kolob is a star or planet described in Mormon scripture. Reference to Kolob is found in the Book of Abraham, a work that is traditionally held by adherents of the Mormon faith as having been translated from an Egyptian papyrus scroll by Joseph Smith, the founder of the Latter Day Saint movement. According to this work, Kolob is the heavenly body nearest to the throne of God.

GoDawgs

(267 posts)
13. Disliking that the Russians sat on this for a year
Mon Aug 29, 2016, 11:43 PM
Aug 2016

Seth Shostak blistered them a bit, but there needs to be more of an outcry.


Side note: is the SKA in South Africa operating yet or are they still completing it- this would be a great project

GoDawgs

(267 posts)
15. Too bad. China's FAST is finished but still shakedown & commissioning
Mon Aug 29, 2016, 11:54 PM
Aug 2016

Altho one wonders if they would share what they found (like the Russians, apparently).

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
17. Yeah, I had to stop at 65 Billion year old star, too.
Tue Aug 30, 2016, 12:49 AM
Aug 2016

The story is interesting but it's hard to take seriously when the MSM fucks up "inconsequential" details like that decimal point.

Anyone with even a basic working knowledge of cosmology understands that the known Universe is only about 14 or so billion years old.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
23. Yeah, I got that. Just find mainstream science reporting exasperating, that's all.
Tue Aug 30, 2016, 02:06 AM
Aug 2016

I agree it's fascinating, and 95 LY is pretty close, in galactic terms. My hunch it will be found to be something else, more mundane--- but that doesn't mean it isn't worth investigating!

 

63splitwindow

(2,657 posts)
21. Well, let's see. It was estimated in 2014 that there were roughly 70 billion trillion
Tue Aug 30, 2016, 01:18 AM
Aug 2016

stars in a universe 13.8 billion years old ( http://www.skyandtelescope.com/astronomy-resources/how-many-stars-are-there/ ) Anyone in DU actually believe we are the only intelligent beings in the universe and/or that we are the most advanced?

longship

(40,416 posts)
22. A 6.5 billion old Sol would not be a good star to be home for life.
Tue Aug 30, 2016, 02:04 AM
Aug 2016

Presuming that life developed earlier, like on Earth.

Our solar system is a little over 4.5 billion years old. In another billion years or so the sun will be a lot hotter. (That's how stellar evolution happens.) Life on Earth will be pretty much be toasted.

I find the claims in this article to be cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs. It just doesn't add up from what we know about stellar evolution. And that is ignoring the misplaced decimal point in the claim of a 65 billion year old star!

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
24. we only have a sample size of one for life to go on, at this point, so we can't really say.
Tue Aug 30, 2016, 02:09 AM
Aug 2016

We don't have a full idea of where life might be, or might not be possible yet, not even close. We only have hunches, and even those have had to be revised in recent decades, like with the discovery of large liquid oceans under the ice of many moons in the outer solar system.

The bottom line is, we don't know. But a civilization that evolved well past the point of our own might very well have come up with technological adaptations to survive the increased brightness of their home star.

longship

(40,416 posts)
25. Well, stellar evolution is more than a hunch.
Tue Aug 30, 2016, 02:15 AM
Aug 2016

For that, we have some hundreds of billions of possible data points in our galaxy alone. I think that it is safe to say that a G-type star that is 6.5 billion years old is going to be a lot hotter than it was when it was 4.5 billion years old. This is basic astronomy, taught in the first semester.

Stellar Evolution

Not a hunch! We've got this one.

OBAFGKM!

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
26. I'm not suggesting that we don't have enough data to know what happens to stars.
Tue Aug 30, 2016, 03:50 AM
Aug 2016

I'm suggesting that we don't have enough data to know what happens to life and what happens to civilizations.

forgotmylogin

(7,522 posts)
27. Or, could the signal be a billion years old
Tue Aug 30, 2016, 04:08 AM
Aug 2016

and just now reach us? If a civilization produced it, they could be long gone by now.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
28. According to the article, no, assuming they've got the right star as the source.
Tue Aug 30, 2016, 04:10 AM
Aug 2016

If it really came from the star they think, it's only 95 light years away, so it took 95 years to get here.

Which also makes it a bit too far for it to be a "response" to any of our Earthly radio transmissions, if I can go on a "Contact"- (the book/movie) based digression for a moment. For a civilization to pick up, say, our earliest radio broadcasts - nearly 100 years ago, so lets say 100 years for the sake of a nice round # - only star systems within 100 LY of sol would have "heard" the broadcasts by now, and only ones within half of that would have had time for an immediately broadcast response to get back to us.

 

magicnpoetry

(45 posts)
31. I Wonder Why
Tue Aug 30, 2016, 09:18 PM
Aug 2016

the Russian scientists would want to keep this to themselves. It seems like all hands on deck would be an obvious response to such an exciting find.

bananas

(27,509 posts)
44. They get a lot of false positives, so they try to rule out a much a they can
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 02:49 AM
Sep 2016

These are very sensitive instruments, they pick up signals from everything, from leaky microwave ovens to secret military satellites.

So even though it was detected a year ago, they couldn't announce it until they ruled out all these other possibilities.

 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
32. IF they could pick up our radio...
Tue Aug 30, 2016, 11:43 PM
Aug 2016

and that's more unlikely than if a "they" exists, it's 1921 to them. They could have been congratulating Warren G. Harding on his inauguration.

The power needed to produce that signal omnidirectionally is immense - scary amounts of power. To tightly focus it at us is even huge. But why would they? We still can't put that kind of power together and they would only have the weak radio signals of 1921 getting there now.

 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
35. I think it's naive to believe that physics can somehow work differently.
Wed Aug 31, 2016, 05:42 AM
Aug 2016

KDKA, the first commercially licensed radio station, TODAY, operates at 50,000 watts. Remember that at 95 light years away, it would take radio waves 95 years to get there. In 1921,KDKA started broadcasting at 100 watts.

Compare that with the signal. Estimates put it at 100 billion billion watts to generate, if it is truly from that star system.

100,000,000,000,000,000,000 watts which allowed us to detect it with our most sensitive radio systems. Versus our 1921 best signals at 100 watts. Even if it were aimed directly at us, and I think it would be naive to believe they would have a reason to aim it at us, it would take on the order of the total power generated by the United States to produce that signal.

If we were to turn off every device that can generate radio waves, every vehicle, computer, fan, refrigerator, air conditioner, anything with an electric motor of any sort, turned the entire planet into an antenna - it would not be possible to detect a 100 watt radio station from 95 light years away.


They were going to spend two nights looking at that system, ending at about now. First night showed nothing. We will know later today if this is WOW2, or something else.



 

63splitwindow

(2,657 posts)
36. We no more understand the capabilities of beings millions of years more advanced than us
Wed Aug 31, 2016, 09:39 AM
Aug 2016

than an ant walking across your keyboard understands your computer. Here was state of the art human flight a little over 100 years ago...

 

63splitwindow

(2,657 posts)
38. Claiming no know all there is to know about what we call physics and how it can be
Wed Aug 31, 2016, 10:24 AM
Aug 2016

manipulated is beyond a losing game. Quantum entanglement--- does it imply that some form of "communication" is, literally, instantaneous? See, I fully understand and appreciate that we know more about physics today than we did 10,000 years ago. You don't seem to understand that what we will know 10,000 years from now (if we still exist as a species) will make what we know today look child-like. One million years from now--- completely beyond our wildest imagination.

 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
41. "Claiming no know all there is to know" Huh?
Wed Aug 31, 2016, 07:37 PM
Aug 2016

You are not demonstrating knowledge of much at all...

 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
45. We can't possibly imagine.. that a Russian Military satellite could confuse a Russian observatory
Fri Sep 2, 2016, 12:45 PM
Sep 2016

for over a year.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Not a Drill: SETI Is Inve...