Science
Related: About this forumA Route to Industrial Carbon Dioxide Fixation: Isocyanate Free Polyurethanes.
The paper I'll discuss in this post is this one: One-Pot Synthesis of Dimethyl Hexane-1,6-diyldicarbamate from CO2, Methanol, and Diamine over CeO2 Catalysts: A Route to an Isocyanate-Free Feedstock for Polyurethanes (Meng et al, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2019 7 12 10708-10715.
It is now widely understood that plastics are representing a huge intractable problem in the environment, but the bulk of this problem is mostly represented by single use plastics, wrappers, cups, stirrers, plastic bags, etc., things most of us see and use every day without much thought.
However some polymers are designed for long term use, and to the extent that they can be made using materials other than dangerous fossil fuel based materials (which do represent the source of the materials from which the bulk of plastics are made) they actually sequester carbon in a form other than proposed waste dumps, which are not being built and never will be built.
The polyurethanes are often utilized in this way; they are strong, long lived, and far less sensitive to high temperatures than other plastics. They are used as lightweight wear resistant parts in complex machinery, as structural materials and in coatings such as varnishes. Some forms of "super glues" are polyurethanes, polymerized in situ where needed to repair products.
They are made by the condensation diisocyanates and dialcohols.
Isocyanates themselves are made by the use of phosgene, COCl2, originally developed as a war gas, and widely utilized in World War I to kill people, and amines with the elimination of HCl, hydrochloric acid.
Early in my career, I worked with phosgene in relatively large (for lab scale) processes and I have personally seen chemical reactors which handle phosgene on a ton scale in my career.
The reason that phosgene is a toxic gas is that it is highly reactive, and therefore highly useful despite being potentially dangerous.
Because of my familiarity with phosgene, coupled with my interest in removing carbon dioxide from the air and transforming it into useful products that effectively sequester carbon dioxide - the general area of industrial science called "CCU," carbon capture and utilization - this paper caught my eye.
From the paper's introduction:
Up to now, several methods to obtain dicarbamates were reported. For example, oxidative carbonylation of diamines,11 the reaction of diamines with dimethylcarbonate (DMC)12?18 or carbamates,19?21 of diamines with urea and alcohol,22?25 of polyureas with dialkylcarbonates,26 of aniline with DMC and subsequent condensation using formaldehyde.27,28
CO2 is a recyclable and naturally plentiful carbon source for various chemical feedstocks and the emissions of CO2 have significantly increased and contributed to global warming.29?31 Thus, the utilization of CO2 has attracted attention in the last decades.32?34
The authors have developed cerium dioxide based catalysts to replace phosgene (the penultimate source of dimethyl carbonate) with carbon dioxide.
The graphics in the paper are largely concerned with the morphology of the catalyst. They are here with their captions.
DMC, dimethyl carbonate, is useful as a fuel, and or a solvent, or, as stated, can be utilized to manufacture isocyanates, and the production of DMC by substituting carbon dioxide for phosgene is another topic widely discussed in the literature.
Here is a description of the process of isocyanate synthesis in this process:
Note that this process requires energy, and if the energy comes from dangerous fossil fuels, the process is useless, and no, trashing the desert with stupid "solar thermal reactors" will not work on an economically viable scale.
Cerium is the most abundant of the lanthanide elements, and is readily available from used nuclear fuels as well meaning that the element can by synthesized from essentially infinitely abundant uranium.
The chemistry of cerium catalysts represents a critical tool in addressing climate change, a subject in which we have essentially no interest left and right, the right being in denial, and the left being dogmatically attached - to the point of deliberate ignorance - in hyping so called "renewable energy" which hasn't worked, isn't working, and won't work to address climate change, and demonizing energy systems that have demonstrably produced far greater results in addressing climate change, nuclear energy.
From the conclusion of the paper:
I hope you are enjoying your weekend.