Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Swede

(33,203 posts)
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 09:07 AM Jul 2012

According to his DNA sequence, James Watson should be blind,deaf,& have a tiny head. Why doesn’t he?

There are many things you might know about James Watson. That he co-discovered the double helix structure of DNA. That he was the first head of the Human Genome Project. That he kicked up a real shitstorm in 2007 for making nasty comments about the intelligence of Africans. That he has a tongue so sharp that one science historian called him “the Caligula of biology,” someone “given license to say anything that came to his mind and expect to be taken seriously.”

You might not know that—according to his DNA sequence, published in Nature in 2008—Watson by all rights should have been blind, deaf, photophobic, prematurely decrepit, and possibly mentally retarded.

http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/chromosomes/features/2012/blogging_the_human_genome_/blogging_the_human_genome_was_the_human_genome_project_a_failure_.html

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
According to his DNA sequence, James Watson should be blind,deaf,& have a tiny head. Why doesn’t he? (Original Post) Swede Jul 2012 OP
Guessing: RNA off/on switches. Harder to correct errors in males though. n/t kickysnana Jul 2012 #1
Well that's strange. Odin2005 Jul 2012 #2
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»According to his DNA sequ...