Anthropology
Related: About this forumThe Return of the Brutal Savage and the Science for War
April 8, 2016
The Return of the Brutal Savage and the Science for War
by Stephen Corry
The last few years have seen an alarming increase in claims that tribal peoples have been shown to be more violent than we are. This is supposed to prove that our ancestors were also brutal savages. Such a message has profound implications for how we view human nature whether or not we see war as innate to the human condition and so, by extension, broadly unavoidable. It also underpins how industrialized society treats those it sees as backward. In reality though its nothing more than an old colonialist belief, masquerading once again as science. Theres no evidence to support it.
The American anthropologist, Napoleon Chagnon, is invariably cited in support of this brutal savage myth. He studied the Yanomami Indians of Amazonia from the 1960s onwards (he spells the tribe Yanomamö) and youd be hard pressed to find a book or article on tribal violence which doesnt refer to his work. Popular writers such as Steven Pinker and Jared Diamond frequently make much of Chagnons thesis, so its worth giving a thumbnail sketch of why in reality it proves little about the Yanomami, and nothing about human evolution.
First, its important to dispatch a red herring from the murky cauldron being cooked up by the brutal savage promoters: They often point to Darkness in El Dorado, a book by Patrick Tierney, which attacked Chagnons work, but went too far. Tierney raised the possibility that one of Chagnons colleagues may have deliberately introduced a deadly measles epidemic to the Indians. That simply wasnt true: In fact, the epidemic was inadvertently started by American missionaries. That Tierney was wrong on this single point is now used to claim that all his and other writers criticisms of Chagnon have been discredited. They havent. In any case, were a single error deemed to negate a whole thesis, then pretty much all science, as well as journalism, the law and a lot else, falls apart.
Anyway, lets set Tierney aside. For decades, Napoleon Chagnons findings have been rejected by almost all of the many other anthropologists who have worked with the Yanomami, and in most countries his work simply isnt taught. He had rather faded from anthropology in the United States too, until his recent resurgence as the darling of establishment attitudes.
According to Chagnon, brutality is a key driver of human evolution. How did he come upon such a disturbing discovery? Basically, he counted how many Yanomami men boasted that they were unokai and he told us this means theyve killed people. He then crunched the numbers to show that unokai are similarly successful in love as they are in war, and that by fathering more children than non-killers, they ensure the next generation is as murderous as they are.
More:
http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/04/08/the-return-of-the-brutal-savage-and-the-science-for-war/
[center] [/center]
haikugal
(6,476 posts)K&R...