Anthropology
Related: About this forumFacial reconstruction of 5,600-year old Maltese woman
May 13, 2013
Facial reconstruction of 5,600-year old Maltese woman
Source: Revealed...the face of a Maltese woman 5,600 years ago
Heritage Malta also launched a 3D virtual reconstruction of facial features based on one of the prehistoric skulls (over 5,000 years old) found at the Xaghra Stone Circle in Gozo. It revealed, for the very first time, what one of the earliest Maltese actually looked like.
It was a face which was much closer to what one would expect from a woman of our day and age rather than that of a person who lived on the islands over 5,000 years ago
[center][/center]
http://dienekes.blogspot.com/2013/05/facial-reconstruction-of-5600-year-old.html
a la izquierda
(11,791 posts)My mom's whole family is a mix of Mediterranean, from Sicilian, to northern Italian, to coastal French and Spanish. Her skin tone (obviously an estimation) is only a little darker than mine (and I'm half British Isles on my dad's side). She looks like every person on my mom's side.
Thanks for posting.
mzteris
(16,232 posts)SheilaT
(23,156 posts)I do.
mzteris
(16,232 posts)but those looked plucked and/or drawn on. Definitely not "natural".
Maybe unconscious bias on the part of the artist?
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)It's an artist's reconstruction after all.
mzteris
(16,232 posts)accuracy might have been appropriate. I think the artist should have been capable of drawing bushy brows, ya know?
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)I'm flabbergasted at that assumption.
mzteris
(16,232 posts)They're certainly not perfectly arched and smooth. I don't know any woman anywhere whose is.
Maybe "bushy" conjured up the wrong image , I'm not talking mark twain or anything, but seriously, those eyebrows looked smoothly plucked and or shaved and drawn.
I reckon I'm flabbergasted that you'd think they look au natural . . .
Whatever. It was merely an observation on my part. Ymmv.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)mzteris
(16,232 posts)And very lucky.