Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
Sat Jul 18, 2015, 12:14 PM Jul 2015

This Week in God.... (Maddow blog)

First up from the God Machine this week is an important legal fight over contraception and the Affordable Care Act – with the larger trend working in the White House’s favor.

With the recent Supreme Court ruling on “Obamacare,” the most significant challenges to the law’s legality have been exhausted, but there are some smaller cases that are pending, including litigation involving access to contraception .MSNBC’s Emma Margolin reported this week:

A federal appeals court has ruled against the Colorado-based Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged, finding that employees of such religious nonprofits must be able to access contraceptive coverage in line with the Affordable Care Act (ACA).

Unlike last year’s controversial Supreme Court case, Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., which successfully challenged the health care law’s birth control mandate in its entirety, this case targeted a federal accommodation for nonprofit organizations with religious objections to birth control. All those groups have to do, under the accommodation, is submit a formal objection to including contraceptive coverage in their employee health plans, so that their health insurance issuers or a third-party administrator can provide the coverage directly.


As longtime readers may recall, Colorado’s Little Sisters of the Poor wants to provide health care coverage to its non-profit group’s employees, but it doesn’t want to cover contraception. No problem, the Obama administration said – the group can fill out some simple paperwork noting a religious objection, at which point a private insurance company can create a separate policy for workers who want access to birth control. The non-profit group wouldn’t be involved and wouldn’t pay a penny.

The nuns filed a federal lawsuit anyway, claiming that the paperwork itself infringes on their religious beliefs.

(the link: )

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/week-god-71815?cid=sm_fb_maddow

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This Week in God.... (Maddow blog) (Original Post) AlbertCat Jul 2015 OP
"the paperwork itself infringes on their religious beliefs"? mr blur Jul 2015 #1
I was drawn to this section of the blog RussBLib Jul 2015 #2
 

mr blur

(7,753 posts)
1. "the paperwork itself infringes on their religious beliefs"?
Sat Jul 18, 2015, 12:19 PM
Jul 2015

WTF do these people want, the law of the whole country to defer to their bigoted delusions?

(Sorry, yes, of course that's what they want)

RussBLib

(9,002 posts)
2. I was drawn to this section of the blog
Sun Jul 19, 2015, 12:07 PM
Jul 2015

this one...

* It’s genuinely difficult sometimes to know when conservatives are kidding: “Fox News radio host Todd Starnes over the weekend delivered a sermon encouraging Christians to fight back against same-sex marriage and transgender equality. Speaking to Abilene Baptist Church in Augusta on Sunday, Starnes began by saying it was good to be back in the South where it was easy to find Waffle House and Chick-fil-A restaurants, which he argued was ‘the official chicken of Jesus.’”


"The Official Chicken of Jesus" lololol

Do these fools ever stop to think about what they say? Probably not. They are inspired by God, by god.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»This Week in God.... (Mad...