2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumseabeyond
(110,159 posts)PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)tecelote
(5,122 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)She's photographed constantly. There are bound to be some unflattering pics.
tecelote
(5,122 posts)Until now, she was their darling.
Metric System
(6,048 posts)riversedge
(70,174 posts)MeNMyVolt
(1,095 posts)Divisive OP that should be trashed.
riversedge
(70,174 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)The same media that kept hounding her about the emails and Benghazi?
What a laughable claim.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)tecelote
(5,122 posts)Poor choice for Huffington yes. But she looks like she's about to tear someone apart. It's powerful.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)that I have always admired: she's got grit in her shit, baby!
mcar
(42,287 posts)CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I post on a lot of boards and someone will post a photo of themselves or of their significant other and invariably someone will make a disparaging remark. My retort is always that the person who is making a disparaging remark about the looks of others should post a photo of themselves.
What do you think of that approach? Your associates can also answer it if they are so inclined.
Thank you in advance,
Respectfully,
DSB
tecelote
(5,122 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)tecelote
(5,122 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Get to posting your selfie!
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I could make more remarks about the looks of the respective candidates and how they once looked but then I would be engaging in the lookism and sexism that society ingrains in us that I have spent a lifetime trying to unlearn.
I try not to judge people by how they look even though that is how our youth oriented culture orients us to.
Being a true progressive requires a lot more than just holding rich people in contempt.
tecelote
(5,122 posts)But, I am just the messenger.
My point is that things have dramatically changed.
Show me an unflattering pic of Hillary prior to this week.
You love your outrage.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)tecelote
(5,122 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Thank you in advance.
tecelote
(5,122 posts)Take it for what it's worth.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)MeNMyVolt
(1,095 posts)tecelote
(5,122 posts)Times have changed.
Metric System
(6,048 posts)tecelote
(5,122 posts)I saw it and was shocked that they used it.
I'm not saying I think it is a good pic, It's not. It's insulting.
But, it is an interesting commentary on how things have changed in a week.
Last week, you never would have seen this.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)We celebrate aging men but kick aging women to the curb.
tecelote
(5,122 posts)I don't celebrate aging men either.
tecelote
(5,122 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)The media has never been a Hillary supporter. The media supports Trump, period.
tecelote
(5,122 posts)But Hillary is their pick. That's why they donated.
artislife
(9,497 posts)The other night they had photos of h, trump and Rubio and Bernie. All of them save Bernie were smiling and looked like the professional head shots given to the press. Bernie was a candid shot and he was pressing his lips giving him a stern look.
You are showing that the press has chosen to use a photo of h looking pouty or mad. That's it. The press is using visuals to create their new narrative.
tecelote
(5,122 posts)I posted this because I was shocked they posted it.
Then I went and re-posted. So, I understand the outrage.
However, it was meant as a statement of where the media has gone.
artislife
(9,497 posts)Come sit by me!
tecelote
(5,122 posts)There in spirit.
riversedge
(70,174 posts)tecelote
(5,122 posts)Not me.
I did mention that I think the media likes Hillary and this pic surprised me.
'Far cry from making fun of her.
MeNMyVolt
(1,095 posts)The "Media" has never been a "Hillary supporter". Heck, they've been against most Dems. I'm sure you're familiar with that.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)What's the point here?
Not a bad picture, imo.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)As mentioned, she is photographed every waking hour. Like all of us, her emotions and reactions will vary. Nothing worng with this pic.
monmouth4
(9,691 posts)one_voice
(20,043 posts)riversedge
(70,174 posts)behavior from the RW only and certainly not on a Democratic board . Shame on you
tecelote
(5,122 posts)MeNMyVolt
(1,095 posts)I would take Riversedge's advice. If your post-primary rep on DU means anything to you.
tecelote
(5,122 posts)I didn't say anything positive about this pic. In fact, I think it is in poor taste.
I almost used the word outrageous in the post but decided to post nothing but the pic.
The reaction here shows me how shallow many are.
I'm fine with my post-primary cred.
Outrage is easy. Have at it if it makes you feel superior.
riversedge
(70,174 posts)tecelote
(5,122 posts)Why, because it is an unflattering pic that the media chose?
Or, could that be the very point? Hint, hint.
It's a terrible picture and certainly meant to demean.
That's the issue here. Not me.
artislife
(9,497 posts)and hate using shame or guilt as a tactic even more.
You did nothing but show them how the narrative in the media is changing. Dang!
tecelote
(5,122 posts)Too bad so many missed it.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)The ones of her with her mouth wide open are far worse.
She's been photographed six ways from Sunday for more than 30 years. There are some good ones and some bad ones.
I have noticed the media likes to use pics of Bernie with his hair all messy. Doesn't bother me. I know his positions are far more powerful than his hair!
tecelote
(5,122 posts)We don't always look great.
Especially me.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)the same page. Ugh. But, for this I'll go back for a peek. I could caption that, as could many here, but nah.
Edit to add: At the same time Obama's skin got darker and darker...I notice those things and they are subtle nuance. Nothing to fight over...just an observation I made at the time.
I'll stay out of this one.
tecelote
(5,122 posts)Thanks.
tblue37
(65,269 posts)tecelote
(5,122 posts)I agree.
tblue37
(65,269 posts)of bias Huffpo was demonstrating is infuriating nonsense. I assumed that you posted the pic to show your own disgust with such obvious bias.
I am sorry you misunderstood my post, but as a teacher of writing at the college level, I blame myself for being ambiguous. I know better than to leave my words open to such misunderstanding, but I posted carelessly and ambiguously. I am sorry.
tecelote
(5,122 posts)I almost posted some text about the pic being outrageous for the media to use but decided to post no comment to see the reaction.
There has been such an unexpected onslaught assuming I was posting it for nefarious reasons having nothing to do with Huffpost's use of the pic.
Obviously, the people attacking took it out of context and think that the pic is unflattering. That says a lot about them, not me. I think it was in poor taste for what it was used for (why I posted) but I like the pic. It would be very powerful in another context.
I took your post wrong but, I do still agree with your point on Huffpost.
Thanks for clearing it up.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)progressoid
(49,961 posts)Green Forest
(232 posts)Unlike Bernie, who could care less how he looks.