Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

dsc

(52,152 posts)
1. I am not in Silver's league
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 03:26 PM
Jan 2016

but I have to say those are more pro Hillary than I think is warranted. I still think Sanders is a favorite to win New Hampshire even if Hillary wins Iowa in anything short of a blow out which I think is rather unlikely. I do think she is a favorite to win Iowa but I don't think the odds are 82/18 more like 60/40.

reformist2

(9,841 posts)
14. It's a pathetic attempt to stop the momentum for Bernie. Looks to me like 538's in the tank for Hill
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 11:47 PM
Jan 2016

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
3. They're basing their predictions on their findings, including that NH voters are influenced by IA
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 04:09 PM
Jan 2016

As their model sees Iowa as a Clinton won, that influence spreads to NH. If Clinton loses Iowa, the model will not be nearly as bullish on her in NH.

As someone who makes models, I can say with confidence that they will be tinkering with the model levers as information comes in that shows what was predictive and what wasn't. Best thing to do is consider their new primary prediction model as being in beta but visible to the public.

DFW

(54,293 posts)
7. Doesn't that come across as the slightest bit optimistic?
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 06:46 PM
Jan 2016

I mean, even the most ardent Hillary supporter should view those numbers with suspicion. Any Sanders supporter in his or her right mind would certainly do so if the forecasts instead had those numbers in Bernie's favor..

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
10. That's not support percentages but likelihood of winning
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 11:23 PM
Jan 2016

A race polling at 52/48 is about 80% likely to be won by the candidate polling at 52.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
9. Plainly a test of power...based on whether opinion at 538 creates reality
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 08:39 PM
Jan 2016

I suspect Nate is killing his reputation for relying on 'just the facts'.

jfern

(5,204 posts)
15. How's the anti Hillary, Jim Webb doing?
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 11:50 PM
Jan 2016

Also, how are Jindal's odds at winning Iowa? And obvious Trump crash and burned 4 months ago.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Today's 538 2016 Primary ...