2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumInteresting crosstab on DM Reg Iowa poll: Definitely caucusing Clinton +9
https://politicalwire.com/2016/01/14/the-key-to-victory-in-iowa/Josh Green points to the crosstabs from the new Des Moines Register/Bloomberg poll in Iowa:
Definitely caucusing: Clinton 45%, Sanders 36%
Probably caucusing: Sanders 47%, Clinton 37%.
thereismore
(13,326 posts)karynnj
(59,501 posts)Measure how likely someone is to caucus. This poll has done very well in past years. However if the excitement for Bernie increases he will immediately shift more to likely caucus. Ie he has more upside he can get from working to get out the people he already has.
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)kids should do us a favor and go to a keger on that night.
They will disappear after the 2016 election and we will be on our own.
jfern
(5,204 posts)reformist2
(9,841 posts)CommonSenseDemocrat
(377 posts)2016 Dem CGs who
have attended a Dem
caucus in the past
n=365
±5.1% pts
13 No, did not attend 2008 Democratic caucus
49 Yes, supported Barack Obama
9 Yes, supported John Edwards
17 Yes, supported Hillary Clinton
3 Yes, supported Joe Biden
1 Yes, supported Christopher Dodd
1 Yes, supported Dennis Kucinich (pron: koo SIN itch)
2 Yes, supported Bill Richardson
1 Yes, supported someone else
2 Yes, not sure of support
3 Not sure whether attended
jfern
(5,204 posts)CommonSenseDemocrat
(377 posts)I believe this explanation, but then it throws the entire poll as being invalid IMO.
dsc
(52,155 posts)It has been a historical thing that polls after the fact don't agree with election results. Way more people claimed to have voted for Kennedy in polls in 61 then actually did in 60, far fewer said they voted for Nixon after he was impeached than actually did in 72 to name two pretty famous examples. That doesn't necessarily invalidate the poll.