Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Interesting crosstab on DM Reg Iowa poll: Definitely caucusing Clinton +9 (Original Post) book_worm Jan 2016 OP
I can't wrap my head around it. It's a wash. nt thereismore Jan 2016 #1
what it means is that whatever metric is used to karynnj Jan 2016 #8
Those college Dawson Leery Jan 2016 #2
You just want to lose in November, huh? jfern Jan 2016 #4
So you want a low turnout. Isn't that what Republicans usually want? reformist2 Jan 2016 #6
The poll is underweighted severely against Hillary supporters CommonSenseDemocrat Jan 2016 #3
Everyone wants to say they picked the winner. Romney had way too high on the Republican side jfern Jan 2016 #5
So at least 30% of poll subjects are liars? CommonSenseDemocrat Jan 2016 #7
could be dsc Jan 2016 #9

karynnj

(59,501 posts)
8. what it means is that whatever metric is used to
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 12:29 AM
Jan 2016

Measure how likely someone is to caucus. This poll has done very well in past years. However if the excitement for Bernie increases he will immediately shift more to likely caucus. Ie he has more upside he can get from working to get out the people he already has.

Dawson Leery

(19,348 posts)
2. Those college
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 09:16 PM
Jan 2016

kids should do us a favor and go to a keger on that night.

They will disappear after the 2016 election and we will be on our own.

 
3. The poll is underweighted severely against Hillary supporters
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 11:50 PM
Jan 2016

2016 Dem CGs who
have attended a Dem
caucus in the past
n=365
±5.1% pts
13 No, did not attend 2008 Democratic caucus
49 Yes, supported Barack Obama
9 Yes, supported John Edwards
17 Yes, supported Hillary Clinton
3 Yes, supported Joe Biden
1 Yes, supported Christopher Dodd
1 Yes, supported Dennis Kucinich (pron: koo SIN itch)
2 Yes, supported Bill Richardson
1 Yes, supported someone else
2 Yes, not sure of support
3 Not sure whether attended

 
7. So at least 30% of poll subjects are liars?
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 12:00 AM
Jan 2016

I believe this explanation, but then it throws the entire poll as being invalid IMO.

dsc

(52,155 posts)
9. could be
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 01:16 AM
Jan 2016

It has been a historical thing that polls after the fact don't agree with election results. Way more people claimed to have voted for Kennedy in polls in 61 then actually did in 60, far fewer said they voted for Nixon after he was impeached than actually did in 72 to name two pretty famous examples. That doesn't necessarily invalidate the poll.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Interesting crosstab on D...