Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SHRED

(28,136 posts)
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 02:50 AM Jan 2016

A Democratic Party at the Crossroad

I see this primary fight as a struggle for the soul of the Democratic Party.
Are we going to settle for the post 1992 Democratic Party of the DLC (Democratic Leadership Council) that the Clintons built? The corporate paid-for party, that occasionally throws a crumb to "we the people"?

Or instead are we going to embrace the party of FDR?
A party that is not focused on how much Wall St corporate ass it can kiss but rather on building and strengthening our social safety nets, rebuilding our infrastructure, and revitalizing the middle-class. A populist party once again.

This is the crossroad as I see it.
No matter who is nominated we need to pressure them towards us and keep that pressure on.
I believe it will require far less pressure if Bernie is nominated.

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Democratic Party at the Crossroad (Original Post) SHRED Jan 2016 OP
No amount of pressure on a politician will make them a populist. Skwmom Jan 2016 #1
+1 daleanime Jan 2016 #2
At least is a straight shooter. I can at least respect him. Hillary i will never. JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #11
FDR? SHRED Jan 2016 #24
The party of FDR, JFK, and RFK awoke_in_2003 Jan 2016 #3
Has evolved into the party of Reagan AgingAmerican Jan 2016 #5
Hah! Latest spin to cover her grifting son-in-law/hedge fund owner. Divernan Jan 2016 #12
Take notice that what Sanders has started won't stop even IF Clinton manages to steal the nomination Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #4
It won't be Clinton - you can already see the shift occurring. n/t Skwmom Jan 2016 #6
The shift, and the wish of the people is clear. Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #7
To clarify -the shift is in the Establishment Democrats and has nothing to do w/what the people want Skwmom Jan 2016 #8
The establishment Democrats have started to shift too? Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #9
Look at our history of Presidential elections before and after 1992 Recursion Jan 2016 #10
The tired "lessons of McGovern" talking point to justify the swing to the Right.... Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2016 #13
Hey, I'm supporting the guy polling at 6% nationally Recursion Jan 2016 #14
I supported Kucinich.... Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2016 #15
Understood. Recursion Jan 2016 #16
Is that the one where everyone eats for a change? Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2016 #17
Umm... maybe? Recursion Jan 2016 #18
Right. It's a harvest festival.... Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2016 #19
I don't even have to look at that history. BlueMTexpat Jan 2016 #20
I agree it's ridiculous Recursion Jan 2016 #21
Windmill jousters are BlueMTexpat Jan 2016 #22
They *might* be giants Recursion Jan 2016 #23

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
1. No amount of pressure on a politician will make them a populist.
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 03:13 AM
Jan 2016

They either are or they aren't. They either serve the people or their corporate masters. You can not do both.

As Biden said - I'm no populist.

I am tired of the BIG CON.


 

SHRED

(28,136 posts)
24. FDR?
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 09:27 AM
Jan 2016

My understanding is that he wasn't always. That he rose to the occasion.
Maybe you're right though. Maybe you are or you are not.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
5. Has evolved into the party of Reagan
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 03:49 AM
Jan 2016

Sad indeed...

A Hillary supporter was arguing the other day that hedge fund managers are 'the little guy'.

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
12. Hah! Latest spin to cover her grifting son-in-law/hedge fund owner.
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 04:11 AM
Jan 2016

"Little guy"!?!?!?

Gimme a fucking break! Sure, all the "little guys" have $10.5 million Manhattan condos!

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
4. Take notice that what Sanders has started won't stop even IF Clinton manages to steal the nomination
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 03:41 AM
Jan 2016

(by means of superdelegates or some dirty DNC trick or so). This movement will keep growing. The question is: will it grow enough to win Iowa in a few weeks? There is a 50/50 chance that will happen.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
7. The shift, and the wish of the people is clear.
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 03:53 AM
Jan 2016

But this is the DNC we are talking about - DWS has pulled some cunning tricks and low-blow stunts before.

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
8. To clarify -the shift is in the Establishment Democrats and has nothing to do w/what the people want
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 03:57 AM
Jan 2016

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
9. The establishment Democrats have started to shift too?
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 04:01 AM
Jan 2016

Could you help me understand that? I think I failed to see that happening. What are you hinting at, please? I'd really like to take in that encouragement.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
10. Look at our history of Presidential elections before and after 1992
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 04:06 AM
Jan 2016

Now, having looked at that, ask yourself why some of us are tepid about a call for a return to pre-1992.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
13. The tired "lessons of McGovern" talking point to justify the swing to the Right....
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 05:00 AM
Jan 2016

That ignores the failure of "supply side economics", the fall of Limbaugh, the age demographic of the national JOKE known as FOX "News", the lessons of the Invasion and SLAUGHTER and TORTURE of the innocent Iraqi people.

What? We can't learn from that? Just ignore it and quiver in fear at the all powerful Right Wing in this country?

Can't beat em so we join them?

No thanks.

It's the 21st century.

Act like it.

BlueMTexpat

(15,365 posts)
20. I don't even have to look at that history.
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 05:56 AM
Jan 2016

I lived much of it. Unfortunately, this "crossroads" rhetoric is all too reminiscent of 2000 for me.

We had an excellent candidate then in Al Gore. But he just wasn't "pure" enough for some. I am still VERY angry about that outcome, which has brought the world to its current sorry state. PBO got us back on the right track. We need to stay there.

Wish that MOM were doing much better in the polls. That he isn't is ridiculous, IMO. But I am very glad to read this am that he will at least be included in the Dem debate this weekend.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»A Democratic Party at the...