Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ram2008

(1,238 posts)
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 05:37 PM Jan 2016

Desperation: Clinton surrogate to demand Sanders release medical records

I'm not sure this is the path that Hillary wants to take to the nomination. Seems like dirty, low ball politics to me. I guess if you can't win on the issues, you have to resort to desperate attacks like these.

A top surrogate for Hillary Clinton is prepping a new attack in an intensifying and increasingly personal war against rival Bernie Sanders -- calling on the 74-year-old to release his medical records before the Iowa caucuses on Feb. 1.

Clinton defender David Brock -- founder of the Correct the Record PAC, which coordinates directly with Clinton’s campaign -- is expected to hit the airwaves this weekend from Charleston, the scene of the third Democratic debate on Sunday night, and challenge Sanders to cough up a clean bill of health and doctor’s note in the next 16 days, according to a Democrat familiar with his thinking who was not authorized to preview any strategy.

Clinton released her medical records, showing she is “fit to serve as President,” last July. A spokeswoman for the Clinton campaign declined to comment on the strategy.

The demand, sources said, reflects growing frustration within the Clinton campaign about a perceived lack of media vetting and public scrutiny of Sanders, just as polls in Iowa show a neck-and-neck race that has taken many in the Clinton campaign by surprise.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/clinton-surrogate-to-demand-sanders-release-medical-records-217880


I think she's starting to feel the heat.
118 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Desperation: Clinton surrogate to demand Sanders release medical records (Original Post) ram2008 Jan 2016 OP
. Wilms Jan 2016 #1
Wow. They're getting desperate, no doubt. TDale313 Jan 2016 #2
He should release them. All candidates should. Metric System Jan 2016 #3
Hillary is clawing like a girl in a catfight. This is stupid. ViseGrip Jan 2016 #54
I'm only surprised he didn't offer them already. Rose Siding Jan 2016 #81
I'm only surprised Hillary hasn't released hers. Loudestlib Jan 2016 #102
What do you think medical reports should entail? Rose Siding Jan 2016 #108
Really? Loudestlib Jan 2016 #110
It would be obtuse to suggest Rose Siding Jan 2016 #113
They all should release their records. Also, I think both Clinton AND Sanders are too old KittyWampus Jan 2016 #4
Intellectually dishonest reply. Rejected. DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #19
what is intellectually dishonest about saying ALL candidates should release medical records? KittyWampus Jan 2016 #61
I'd vote for Jimmy Carter at 90! And by the way, Trump will turn 70 in June. Zen Democrat Jan 2016 #90
Youth is no guarantee of good health. PADemD Jan 2016 #97
Oh boy. She seems determined to damage her own campaign cali Jan 2016 #5
All candidates, Democrat and Republican, should release their medical records. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #6
Should a democratic candidate give the greenlight for an attack ad on this? ram2008 Jan 2016 #14
Shouldn't be part of any attack. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #23
And Clinton took this and decided to ATTACK sanders over it ram2008 Jan 2016 #32
We have a right to know if any candidate is physically and emotionally fit to serve. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #37
Again ignoring the topic at hand, this is grade A desperation ram2008 Jan 2016 #41
I don't see any desperation DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #46
It's an attack ad from a SUPERPAC based on focus group polling ram2008 Jan 2016 #57
The presidency is a demanding job. Don't you want to know if they are emotionally and physically DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #58
Why aren't you addressing the topic at hand? She made an ATTACK AD about that ram2008 Jan 2016 #60
It seems we are in accord. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #65
Did I say we should release an attack ad on it? ram2008 Jan 2016 #67
You asked for Clinton's medical records. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #70
Do you believe there should be Attack ads based on it? ram2008 Jan 2016 #71
I believe we have a right to the know the health of any candidate for presidency. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #73
So, you agree that its ok for Hillary's campaign to make an attack ad on the health of a candidate ram2008 Jan 2016 #74
I agree we have a right to know if a candidate is medically fit to serve DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #76
Which is exactly what I said, you endorse the attack ads ram2008 Jan 2016 #79
That may be, but she is using the issue as a politically. pangaia Jan 2016 #62
What Republicans do? Mike__M Jan 2016 #59
Every nominee, regardless of party, has released their medical records since 1980. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #69
That's not the point. cali Jan 2016 #17
"Is this a debatable proposition?" awoke_in_2003 Jan 2016 #86
Has Hillary? Or has she released only the summary letter? morningfog Jan 2016 #111
A summary would be a good starting point for all the major candidates. Do you disagree? DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #112
Of Hillary is going to go this route, she needs to match it. morningfog Jan 2016 #114
I agree...Secretary Clinton should provide as much medical information about herself as... DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #115
No disagreement there. morningfog Jan 2016 #116
To be fair Bush and Trump have released medical summaries./nt DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #117
Good to know. morningfog Jan 2016 #118
It is a reasonable request. hrmjustin Jan 2016 #7
Is it reasonable to demand via airwaves and attack ads? ram2008 Jan 2016 #15
It may nit have been done in a polite way but if is a reasonable request. hrmjustin Jan 2016 #20
A lot of what the Clinton Campaign is doing right now TDale313 Jan 2016 #68
Intellectually dishonest reply. Rejected. DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #16
It's stupid. And it makes her look pretty and small cali Jan 2016 #21
Whether it is bad or good he should release his medical records. hrmjustin Jan 2016 #30
Yea, but it shouldn't be at the request of his opponent Karma13612 Jan 2016 #42
Well it is his own fault for not releasing them earlier. hrmjustin Jan 2016 #49
I do hear what you are saying. peace. eom Karma13612 Jan 2016 #56
I think even more so Marty McGraw Jan 2016 #101
Sure and I actually don't mind Hillary tripping herself up and spurring fundraising cali Jan 2016 #52
Too bad he won't raise monry for the party like Hillary did. hrmjustin Jan 2016 #53
Too bad the party doesn't help him like they do Hillary. draa Jan 2016 #75
That argument is hogwash! hrmjustin Jan 2016 #77
Tough. draa Jan 2016 #87
This line of thinking is why we are in the minority in both house. hrmjustin Jan 2016 #88
Nope. draa Jan 2016 #93
They why isn't Sanders raising money and recruiting candidates for the party? hrmjustin Jan 2016 #94
Once again, nope. draa Jan 2016 #96
This: 56miSSie Jan 2016 #106
This is seriously getting insanely pathetic-- jkbRN Jan 2016 #8
This sounds the most reasonable. The Wielding Truth Jan 2016 #35
K & R !!! WillyT Jan 2016 #9
This guy David Brock sounds like a real creep FlatBaroque Jan 2016 #10
Centrist. Sanders-attacking liar. DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #18
Joe Klein wrote Primary Colors, not David Brock. The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2016 #22
Whoops...I feel dumb. Thank you. I will edit. nt DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #26
Former repuke who wrote a nasty book about Anita Hill cali Jan 2016 #27
Except then he changed and shifted to the Left. Weird how you'd just ignore that fact. KittyWampus Jan 2016 #63
Nah, David Brock was a rightwing Clinton hater senz Jan 2016 #64
Why now when she is behind in the polls? Peregrine Took Jan 2016 #11
I think we all know why TDale313 Jan 2016 #38
Oh my. She's stepping in it again. If Bernie knew he wasn't healthy, he wouldn't be running. n/t in_cog_ni_to Jan 2016 #12
yes he would run anyway because all he cares about is restorefreedom Jan 2016 #24
Hahaha. Refreshing. Isn't it? Bernie is who he is and that's a man of good character. The Wielding Truth Jan 2016 #40
yup. thats why the screaming desperation and poo flinging. restorefreedom Jan 2016 #48
perhaps (David Brock) Marty McGraw Jan 2016 #104
Another million $$ worth of donations are coming in to the Sanders campaign Truprogressive85 Jan 2016 #13
inr? more money for bernie who hoooooo!,! nt restorefreedom Jan 2016 #25
Happens every time. TIME TO PANIC Jan 2016 #31
Maybe she's hoping for VP silenttigersong Jan 2016 #28
All I want to know if Sanders PAP smear test turned out okay... truedelphi Jan 2016 #29
a most Marty McGraw Jan 2016 #105
If he does, will they demand his long-form medical records? nxylas Jan 2016 #33
No doubt, huh... Marty McGraw Jan 2016 #107
They should trade them, tit for tat. tazkcmo Jan 2016 #34
+1 draa Jan 2016 #80
What's Bernie's BMI? What's HRC's? nt antigop Jan 2016 #36
Is the Clinton campaign entering self destruct mode? TIME TO PANIC Jan 2016 #39
He should... fainting, concussion, blood clots near brain, exhaustion... Ino Jan 2016 #43
Bernie go ahead but wait bkkyosemite Jan 2016 #44
Just hideous Hillary. Please tell him to "Cut it Out". kthx. nt stillwaiting Jan 2016 #45
All candidates should release their medical records period! leftofcool Jan 2016 #47
Hey Hillary... how'z about taking a MRI for us? Concussions in senior citizens increase the risk of cherokeeprogressive Jan 2016 #50
Makes ya wonder ... senz Jan 2016 #51
Right after Billy Clinton releases his medical files aspirant Jan 2016 #55
Careful what you wish for Hillary, thereismore Jan 2016 #66
Is there a reason aspirant Jan 2016 #72
Maybe she's considering a run as Bernie's VP? senz Jan 2016 #78
As a neutral poli-sci guy, not taking sides, this really casts a bad optic on her campaign. TheBlackAdder Jan 2016 #82
Ick. AzDar Jan 2016 #83
Didn't Hilary fall on her head? I'm not she wants to go there with Bernie. jalan48 Jan 2016 #84
SHe Is going to make it Impossible for me to support her in any way. Ferd Berfel Jan 2016 #85
Fuckers. I'm going to go broke azmom Jan 2016 #89
That was my first thought too!!! baran Jan 2016 #91
Yep. Can't let go this unanswered. Another $25 azmom Jan 2016 #92
I'm starting to hold Marty McGraw Jan 2016 #109
Bosh. Treant Jan 2016 #95
Releasing medical records is a normal thing for candidates to do in every election cycle anigbrowl Jan 2016 #98
Is it normal for a candidate from the same party to release a SUPERPAC attack ad on it? ram2008 Jan 2016 #99
Doesn't bother me none anigbrowl Jan 2016 #103
Stay classy, Hillary deutsey Jan 2016 #100

Rose Siding

(32,623 posts)
108. What do you think medical reports should entail?
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 08:55 PM
Jan 2016

Not everyone can read a blood panel or an xray or a ct scan. A medical professional's report could be dismissively called "a note" I guess, but why?

The report said Clinton, who is 67, has fully recovered from a concussion she sustained in December 2012 after fainting, an episode that Bardack attributed to a stomach virus and dehydration.

During the course of her concussion treatment, Clinton was also found to have a blood clot and was given medication to dissolve it. She remains on the medicine as a precaution, Bardack wrote.

The blood clot, which was in a vein in the space between the brain and the skull behind the right ear, led Clinton to spend a few days in New York-Presbyterian Hospital and take a month-long absence from the State Department for treatment.
...
Bardack said testing the following year showed “complete resolution” of the concussion’s effects, including double vision, which Clinton wore glasses with special lenses to address.

According to her doctor’s assessment, Clinton’s cholesterol and blood pressure are in normal, healthy ranges, and she has had the major cancer screenings and exams recommended for someone her age. She has a very common thyroid condition and seasonal allergies, and takes a blood thinner – Coumadin – as a precaution since her fall and the blood clot.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/clintons-tax-medical-records-released/

Loudestlib

(980 posts)
110. Really?
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 09:13 PM
Jan 2016

You're telling me that you don't understand the difference between a report on a single event and a record?

Rose Siding

(32,623 posts)
113. It would be obtuse to suggest
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 10:03 PM
Jan 2016

that a report on a "single event" would include all of this:

According to her doctor’s assessment, Clinton’s cholesterol and blood pressure are in normal, healthy ranges, and she has had the major cancer screenings and exams recommended for someone her age. She has a very common thyroid condition and seasonal allergies, and takes a blood thinner – Coumadin – as a precaution since her fall and the blood clot.
 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
4. They all should release their records. Also, I think both Clinton AND Sanders are too old
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 05:43 PM
Jan 2016

I should post photos of Obama before/after.

And he's an athlete.

I can hear the whining about "ageism" already...

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
61. what is intellectually dishonest about saying ALL candidates should release medical records?
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 06:27 PM
Jan 2016

What a bizarre comment.

Take a look at Obama, that's also true.

Clinton and Sanders are both old for the pressures of eight years in office, also true.

Zen Democrat

(5,901 posts)
90. I'd vote for Jimmy Carter at 90! And by the way, Trump will turn 70 in June.
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 08:15 PM
Jan 2016

Bernie has local, state and federal experience over decades.

PADemD

(4,482 posts)
97. Youth is no guarantee of good health.
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 08:35 PM
Jan 2016

I read the local obituaries every day, and the ages range from newborn to 100+.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
5. Oh boy. She seems determined to damage her own campaign
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 05:44 PM
Jan 2016

She doesn't need to do this. Everyone knows Bernie is 74.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
6. All candidates, Democrat and Republican, should release their medical records.
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 05:45 PM
Jan 2016

Is this a debatable proposition?

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
23. Shouldn't be part of any attack.
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 06:00 PM
Jan 2016

The presidency is a physically and emotionally demanding job. Voters have the right to know if any candidate is fit to serve. Most serious candidates release their medical records on their own. I know the major contenders from both parties have already done so.

ram2008

(1,238 posts)
32. And Clinton took this and decided to ATTACK sanders over it
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 06:05 PM
Jan 2016

And it will be on the airwaves.

How is this even remotely defensible? Scummy politics. I'll be glad when she loses now.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
37. We have a right to know if any candidate is physically and emotionally fit to serve.
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 06:08 PM
Jan 2016

So far, Trump, Bush, and Clinton have released their medical records.

I remember when we learned of Bob Dole's health right down to knowing he took two tablespoons of Metamucil a day for regularity.

ram2008

(1,238 posts)
41. Again ignoring the topic at hand, this is grade A desperation
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 06:11 PM
Jan 2016

Clinton is using this and turning it into an ATTACK AD because of her poll numbers are tanking. Desperate, indefensible scummy politics. Keep spinning.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
46. I don't see any desperation
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 06:14 PM
Jan 2016

Releasing one's medical records for highest office keeps within long established tradition.

Well, every major presidential candidate of our generation has released their medical records.

It's a public service.

ram2008

(1,238 posts)
57. It's an attack ad from a SUPERPAC based on focus group polling
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 06:22 PM
Jan 2016

As her poll numbers are falling and the country has been denouncing these types of politics. If you can't see the desperation and the dirty politics being played by Hillary by making an attack AD based on this then I don't know what to tell you. It's not surprise people overwhelming disagree with your opinion, you clearly shill for Hillary no matter what comes out of her mouth or her campaign.

I'd say the mental health of a President is more important than the physical health (veep can always take control if there's incapacitate), and since Hillary seems to be unhinged it seems she's unfit to be President based on these attacks.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
58. The presidency is a demanding job. Don't you want to know if they are emotionally and physically
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 06:24 PM
Jan 2016

The presidency is a demanding job. Don't you want to know if they are emotionally and physically fit to serve?

ram2008

(1,238 posts)
60. Why aren't you addressing the topic at hand? She made an ATTACK AD about that
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 06:26 PM
Jan 2016

Do you think this is a valid thing to make an attack ad about? And do you agree that this is good politics? I'll wait for your answer.

I don't think Hillary is emotionally ready, Cold, manipulative, liar, can't keep herself under control when failing. Unhinged.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
65. It seems we are in accord.
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 06:32 PM
Jan 2016
Where are Hillary's mental health records? What about the clot?

I'd like to see more than a letter from her doctor, she should release all the records, I'm worried there might have been more.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1015534

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1015534





It seems we are in accord. We have a right to know if the candidate for the highest office in the land is medically fit to serve.

ram2008

(1,238 posts)
67. Did I say we should release an attack ad on it?
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 06:33 PM
Jan 2016

Nope I don't think so. That would be scummy, Clinton politics.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
73. I believe we have a right to the know the health of any candidate for presidency.
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 06:39 PM
Jan 2016

The instrument that brings upon their release should be of no moment.

Heck, we knew Bob Dole took Metamucil to keep him regular.

ram2008

(1,238 posts)
74. So, you agree that its ok for Hillary's campaign to make an attack ad on the health of a candidate
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 06:43 PM
Jan 2016

Interesting, well, no doubt you're a Clinton supporter and have Clinton values.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
76. I agree we have a right to know if a candidate is medically fit to serve
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 06:45 PM
Jan 2016

I agree we have a right to know if a candidate is medically fit to serve and I couldn't care less the instrument used to bring about its discovery.

ram2008

(1,238 posts)
79. Which is exactly what I said, you endorse the attack ads
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 06:49 PM
Jan 2016

"Couldn't care less about the instrument used" Again, clearly a Clinton supporter, not caring about the dirty politics of an action.

You know based on their campaign strategy you'd think there must be someone in the Clinton inner circle deliberately trying to sabotage her campaign. No one can be this tone deaf as to create a political attack ad on someones health, this attack will bring in another 2-3 million in fundraising for the Sanders campaign.

Mike__M

(1,052 posts)
59. What Republicans do?
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 06:25 PM
Jan 2016
"the major contenders from both parties have already done so"


Since the Republicans and Clinton did it, it must be the right thing to do?

Personally, I think the voters have the right to decide for themselves whether the withholding or release of medical records will influence their decision.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
69. Every nominee, regardless of party, has released their medical records since 1980.
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 06:35 PM
Jan 2016

If a candidate hides his or her medical records and gets sick or dies in office I am affected, whether I voted for him or her or not.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
112. A summary would be a good starting point for all the major candidates. Do you disagree?
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 10:02 PM
Jan 2016







Always respectfully,
DSB
 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
114. Of Hillary is going to go this route, she needs to match it.
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 10:05 PM
Jan 2016

A current summary for his. Her full records for his. Or she should back off.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
115. I agree...Secretary Clinton should provide as much medical information about herself as...
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 10:11 PM
Jan 2016

I agree...Secretary Clinton should provide as much medical information about herself as Senator Sanders.






Always respectfully,

DSB

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
116. No disagreement there.
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 10:19 PM
Jan 2016

I don't think the health of the candidate is out of bounds. I think the contrary, in fact. But, when one candidate has had some recent concerning health issues, using the candidate's health record as a basis for an attack is not a very smart move. This is the problem I always see with Hillary the campaigner. She causes problems for herself that weren't there before, she invites it.

Setting that to the side, I am for seeing it all, with a caveat. At this stage, I think our Democratic candidates should agree to a current summary. I say that because I don't expect the repub counterparts to mutually engage. Why should we give them more than they are willing to give. Let's satiate the Dem voters, to the extent they need it. We can pick the battle anew with whomever the repubs offer as the sacrificial lamb, with some of our bargaining cards still in hand.

ram2008

(1,238 posts)
15. Is it reasonable to demand via airwaves and attack ads?
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 05:56 PM
Jan 2016

Hm? And wasn't Clinton the one whining about negative ads?

TDale313

(7,820 posts)
68. A lot of what the Clinton Campaign is doing right now
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 06:34 PM
Jan 2016

Is not being done in a polite or intellectually honest way. Frankly, I think she's still the frontrunner, but it comes across as desperate and I think it's likely to backfire.

Karma13612

(4,544 posts)
42. Yea, but it shouldn't be at the request of his opponent
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 06:13 PM
Jan 2016

who is using pretty nasty, dirty underhanded tactics.

I know, politics is dirty.

I agree he should release them.

But now it is going to be an act of defense instead of a voluntary disclosure.



Marty McGraw

(1,024 posts)
101. I think even more so
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 08:41 PM
Jan 2016

in this day and age, it is only smart to hold personal information to one's self only until the point it becomes necessary in releasing it and is no business for the opposition (in this case a primary contender) to be the one asking for it. Kinda reeks up on the line of Repugnants asking for Obama's birth certificate. Or does she think we're too dumb to draw any conclusions to that... my bad

draa

(975 posts)
75. Too bad the party doesn't help him like they do Hillary.
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 06:43 PM
Jan 2016

Can't have it both ways. They've done everything possible to make sure Clinton is elected. Not just against Sanders but against O'Malley as well. They've offered nothing but the name Democrat and the voter rolls of our party. There's been ZERO support beyond that. None.

Anyway, why would he raise money for people who don't like him and are actively trying to defeat him? That's just damn stupid and would be like rasing money for Republicans. smh

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
77. That argument is hogwash!
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 06:49 PM
Jan 2016

The party is more than the DNC and that money is needed for gotv in races for the house and senate and he did not raise a dime for that.

If he wins he can replace dnc personal.

draa

(975 posts)
87. Tough.
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 08:01 PM
Jan 2016

Get better candidates and you won't need so much money. And if they can't do it themselves then they deserve to lose. Their ideas are all more of the same and that's not what Sanders will support.

Show him that people that will have his back and he'd likely support some. The Status Quo though, the ones you seem to want him to support, they can go stuff it I'm sure.

draa

(975 posts)
93. Nope.
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 08:24 PM
Jan 2016

Bought and paid for Democrats are why we're in the minority.

And it has nothing to with not supporting candidates. It's about not supporting shitty candidates.

When Obama was elected he came in with a super-majority because people thought he'd change how things were being done. That was his slogan in fact. Then, he decided to ignore the crooks that stole $22T from hard working people. He decided to drone strike. He decided to support crap like the TPP. He decided to shelter those same crooks who stole our lives while problems like 21% childhood poverty are ignored. It's higher now than it was when he took office. All the while Wall Street recently hit record highs. That's disgusting. And shit like that is why we don't have a majority anymore.



draa

(975 posts)
96. Once again, nope.
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 08:31 PM
Jan 2016

As long as the Democratic leadership remains in the hands of neoliberals and third way people there's probably not much chance of that.

Tell me, if you were trying to get rid of bees(neoliberals) would you put sugar water(cash) out for them.

This entire conversation is pointless. If it happens it will. If it doesn't I'm sure you'll get over it. eom

jkbRN

(850 posts)
8. This is seriously getting insanely pathetic--
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 05:46 PM
Jan 2016

what on earth is the HRC camp doing to themselves?

Brock is an absolutely disgusting person, and the HRC camp is gonna take huge heat for this type of rhetoric.

As a nurse, I do not think candidates should be forced to reveal their health conditions to the public--there should be an internal process to where all candidates have to provide documentation detailing that they are healthy enough to take the job. But illnesses, medication, pt hx, should be kept PRIVATE.

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
18. Centrist. Sanders-attacking liar.
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 05:58 PM
Jan 2016

David Brock is one of those inside-the-beltway guys far more impressed with himself than anyone else is.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
64. Nah, David Brock was a rightwing Clinton hater
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 06:32 PM
Jan 2016

who had a change of heart and became a centrist Dem Clinton supporter.

He used to write hit pieces for the Right; he wrote one on Clinton (a book, iirc) and I think he was the guy who trashed Anita Hill.

All of this is from memory and there are probably errors in it.

Peregrine Took

(7,412 posts)
11. Why now when she is behind in the polls?
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 05:48 PM
Jan 2016

She could have done so a month ago - when she wasn't so worried, that is.

Marty McGraw

(1,024 posts)
104. perhaps (David Brock)
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 08:50 PM
Jan 2016

is aware of something Bernie isn't? I'm now worried about where Bernie dines & drinks. Don't Get stuck by any Umbrella Tips!

- I hope

Truprogressive85

(900 posts)
13. Another million $$ worth of donations are coming in to the Sanders campaign
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 05:51 PM
Jan 2016

Thanks David Brock !!



Sen. Sanders will release his record when the time comes

in the mean time we now have health-truthers

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
29. All I want to know if Sanders PAP smear test turned out okay...
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 06:04 PM
Jan 2016

My dad would report to me faithfully each year (and with a twinkle in his eyes) that his results were always good results.

And he lived to be Ninety!

nxylas

(6,440 posts)
33. If he does, will they demand his long-form medical records?
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 06:06 PM
Jan 2016

All the while producing a string of Photoshopped Kenyan medical records, each of which is definitely the real one this time?

tazkcmo

(7,300 posts)
34. They should trade them, tit for tat.
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 06:07 PM
Jan 2016

After all, it's the esteemed Secretary that reportedly needs naps.

Ino

(3,366 posts)
43. He should... fainting, concussion, blood clots near brain, exhaustion...
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 06:13 PM
Jan 2016

Oh wait... that wasn't Sanders.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
50. Hey Hillary... how'z about taking a MRI for us? Concussions in senior citizens increase the risk of
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 06:16 PM
Jan 2016

dementia.

Not that I'd vote for you even if it were clear, but I think it's a fair request.

aspirant

(3,533 posts)
55. Right after Billy Clinton releases his medical files
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 06:21 PM
Jan 2016

We can't have a First Man die in the White house, very tragic

If he is medically unfit we need a detailed contract with the people saying that he will play absolutely no role in any way in the Hills administration.

aspirant

(3,533 posts)
72. Is there a reason
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 06:39 PM
Jan 2016

why we elect a 2 person team to the Presidency?

Will the VP be ready to take over in case of an emergency? LBJ stepped in when a young, healthy, fit JFK was killed.

TheBlackAdder

(28,169 posts)
82. As a neutral poli-sci guy, not taking sides, this really casts a bad optic on her campaign.
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 07:22 PM
Jan 2016

.


Everyone knows that surrogates are just extensions of a campaign.

They would not drop something like this unless it was cleared by the campaign's upper levels.


===


Their campaign seems disconnected with the voters, trapped in a myopic alternate reality.

It's a shame, she was really shown to be the strongest candidate going into election season.

Most of the errors in the campaign are her own camp's doing. She did great at the Benghazi hearings, and now this?


.

Ferd Berfel

(3,687 posts)
85. SHe Is going to make it Impossible for me to support her in any way.
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 07:58 PM
Jan 2016

DOn't count on this bullshit that the republican are SO AWFUL that you just HAVE to vote for Hillary.
I'm getting to the FUCK IT point.

BTW - When is Hillary going to release her Psychological records?

 

baran

(92 posts)
91. That was my first thought too!!!
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 08:18 PM
Jan 2016

Oh well, guess I'm good for another $20. Bernie doesn't need to do any fund raisers -- Hillary's doing it for him.

Marty McGraw

(1,024 posts)
109. I'm starting to hold
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 08:58 PM
Jan 2016

out for some down ballot needs as income permits. They're gonna need our help too.

Treant

(1,968 posts)
95. Bosh.
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 08:29 PM
Jan 2016

Undefined source, supposed to be coming. If it happens at all, I'll react to it then.

That having been said, I do think any Presidential candidate does owe the public some level of access to their records and this doesn't look great for Sanders. Smoke, fire, and all that.

 

anigbrowl

(13,889 posts)
98. Releasing medical records is a normal thing for candidates to do in every election cycle
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 08:35 PM
Jan 2016

This has been the case for a long time now, I am surprised to discover Sanders has not done so already.

 

anigbrowl

(13,889 posts)
103. Doesn't bother me none
Sat Jan 16, 2016, 08:43 PM
Jan 2016

Fitness to serve is an entirely reasonable thing to challenge another candidate about.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Desperation: Clinton surr...