2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWatching MTP. It looks like we're not alone.
Chuckie refers to Iowa poll that asked Iowa Democrats if they considered themselves socialists or capitalists and 43 percent said socialist and just 38% said capitalist. That's a .massive sea change that's never been seen in my lifetime, and I remember Harry Truman.
Iowans are as middle-American as middle-Americans can be. And they're claiming the socialist mantle. My jaw is lying on the floor. Could someone help me pick it up?
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)so am I. I have always been a socialist.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)It's a nice feeling, isn't comrade.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)I think that is very doable.
Needing 13% above that 38% is going to be much harder. There is only 19% to play with if we assume all the Socialists vote for Bernie and all the Capitalists vote for Hillary (which is a pretty big assumption). Getting 13 out of 19 seems very unlikely to me.
Edit due to Freudian slip (hard to do while typing, but I did it).
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)cannabis_flower
(3,856 posts)there are a few who claim to be capitalists who will vote for Bernie.
Eric J in MN
(35,621 posts)"...a remarkable 43 percent of likely Democratic caucus participants describe themselves as socialists, including 58 percent of Sanderss supporters and about a third of Clintons."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/can-clinton-find-the-spark-to-fend-off-the-challenge-from-sanders/2016/01/16/a6b4d98a-bc6f-11e5-829c-26ffb874a18d_story.html
MADem
(135,425 posts)Punkingal
(9,522 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)mimi85
(1,805 posts)it definitely was underrated.
Green Forest
(232 posts)They wear the mantle of first-in-the-nation with integrity. I am not surprised.
People underestimate Iowans but they were ahead of the curve in 2008 before any other state.
rurallib
(63,327 posts)and welcome to DU.
Green Forest
(232 posts)I volunteered for Obama in Des Moines from 2007-2008 and in doing so, I gained a healthy respect for the caucus process -- it's the closest thing to the Athenian concept of pure democracy we have in the U.S. when done correctly -- and "Iowa Nice" Iowans.
I'd ask you more but do not want to put you on the spot. Thanks again for the welcome!
rurallib
(63,327 posts)referred to as a 'PM' around here (PMed you)
click on the yellow banner when it comes up or click on 'my inbox' in the upper right corner.
will be busy for a few hours but will check back before end of day
Green Forest
(232 posts)I was hoping we could "talk" but wanted to respect your privacy. I will PM you back later, too.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)and work to do a good job. I trust them to know that Bernie is a good choice.
Green Forest
(232 posts)Ergo, the result in 2008.
MBS
(9,688 posts)MBS
(9,688 posts)They deserve to be proud of their role. I have huge respect for them, and look forward to seeing what happens in this caucus in particular.
I did telephone-campaigning for Kerry in 2003/2004, and found Iowa voters by far the most knowledgeable and most serious voters I encountered in the entire campaign.
They really took their caucus responsibilities seriously.
I found myself thinking, "If all voters were like this, our country would be in better shape than it is."
Green Forest
(232 posts)Are you doing anything now for any candidate? I was crushed by what happened to Kerry in 2004 but have been very proud of him since, especially now as he is the absolute best Secretary of State in my lifetime. Honestly, he deserves a Nobel Peace Prize.
MBS
(9,688 posts)I was all in for Kerry and Obama, but I am not committed to anyone yet (except to voting for the Dem candidate in November). Also, unfortunately, I am forced by circumstances to focus on keeping my home fires burning right now.
But my Iowa phone-banking for Kerry was truly a wonderful experience. People were so open and earnest and knowledgeable. I know I swayed at least one undecided voter, too. She had been featured on NBC News as an undecided voter; from what had been revealed about her background, I knew just how to reach her. (Key themes of my pitch revolved around 4-H and Pella Windows ). So, after blissfully ignoring the phone-bank supervisor's rules about which phone lists to call that day, I hunted her down (at her office! on a Saturday!), and then, when she told me that she and NBC News were going to be at a tea with Teresa Heinz Kerry, I passed the info onto the Powers that Be. Then, on caucus night, she announced her choice for Kerry on NBC News!! When asked what swayed her, she said, " A phone call from Sen. Kerry". (Good! He/they did exactly what needed to be done!).But I think I get to take credit for starting the ball rolling in the first place. A proud moment - too bad I can't list it on my resume!
I worked in New Hampshire, too, but Iowa was the best.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)eShirl
(18,908 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)time to board or get out of the way.
i was amazed at the somewhat evenhandedness of chuck toaster pastries. he is almost starting to act like a real analyst and not a campaign hack.
hedda_foil
(16,546 posts)I was looking forward to Dickerson on FTN but his interview with Bernie was all attempted gotcha questions with a bizarre camera angle on the 2-shot that made Bernie look lilllputian.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)and i was hopeful initially. mtp did the best job.
wait.....what's happening to me???
Bohunk68
(1,364 posts)He was fairly evenhanded and that shocked me. Hillary, otoh was using dog whistles galore against Bernie, just like the rethugs he interviewed. Rubio was off the fricking wall. That guy is crazy.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)many of us. he might turn out to be a voice of reason. wouldn't that be hilarious?
Utopian Leftist
(534 posts)with an axe to grind.
I have a feeling about Rubio: what he wants, what he really, really wants? His finger on the button.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)i wish i could disagree
but i can't
MBS
(9,688 posts)A narcissistic, shamelessly careerist, unprincipled, completely irresponsible (especially about the responsibilities of his elected offices), lying, spoiled brat lunatic. I continue to marvel how he can reel out a superficially-fluent flow of words, without actually saying anything.
And, yes, Chuck Todd was good yesterday to my surprise as well. Hopefully, he'll keep it up.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)but it won't do them any good this cycle...even the repubs are bucking the establishment. keeping fingers crossed that todd turns into a real pundit with fairness and evenhandedness..
ish of the hammer
(444 posts)If true, Iowa Democrats are starting to get it.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)I need a new Lamborghini.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)By simply saying so what? and reminding people of what socialism really is, and how
socialism works for ALL of us through SS, Medicare, etc.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)changing the narrative. Challenging the excuses. Repeating the information often so it sticks.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)karynnj
(60,047 posts)I think what happened here is that the question creates a "choice" leading most to choose one or the other.
The second thing is that it shows the combination of how the word "capitalism" has increased negatives, while socialism is - at least seen as more benign than capitalism.
Back in 2010, a British English teacher was telling us that she showed her students both the Obama hope poster and a 2010 Republican version that made Obama blacker and replaced "hope" with "socialism". The idea was to show the power of graphics and propaganda. It didn't quite work -- until she explained that in the US "socialism" was considered a bad thing!
It is interesting that this either shows that capitalist has become MORE toxic or socialism ( ie SS, Medicare etc) is becoming less demonized.
TBF
(34,862 posts)it seems to go in waves. We had heavy socialist voting back in the very early 1900s. The unions get strong and put up socialist candidates (or at least very liberal), they make progress w/hours etc., capital pushes back with ad campaigns & weakens the unions, conditions start deteriorating, workers start organizing again, rinse and repeat. It seems to go in cycles. The past 30+ years have been full of corporations/churches taking over in every possible way. People are starting to realize they are not the winners in that situation.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)take over in every possible way.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Duval
(4,280 posts)hedda_foil
(16,546 posts)Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)scottie55
(1,400 posts)Who gets in the way of their profits.
Chevron / Texaco Kills Thousands
http://www.amazonrainforestnews.com/2009/09/ecuador-vs-chevron-saga-of-death.html
Millions Starve From Goldman Sachs Crisis
http://foreignpolicy.com/2011/04/27/how-goldman-sachs-created-the-food-crisis/
The list goes on, and on, and on.
Murder for profit.
Anyone see why some might consider Capitalism anything less than perfect?
By they way, after killing thousands, or millions, no one went to prison.
That's how the world turns right?
Bernie, and Us can stop this madness. Once and for all. Before it is too late.
questionseverything
(10,314 posts)The result of Wall Streets venture into grain and feed and livestock has been a shock to the global food production and delivery system. Not only does the worlds food supply have to contend with constricted supply and increased demand for real grain, but investment bankers have engineered an artificial upward pull on the price of grain futures. The result: Imaginary wheat dominates the price of real wheat, as speculators (traditionally one-fifth of the market) now outnumber bona-fide hedgers four-to-one.
Today, bankers and traders sit at the top of the food chain the carnivores of the system, devouring everyone and everything below. Near the bottom toils the farmer. For him, the rising price of grain should have been a windfall, but speculation has also created spikes in everything the farmer must buy to grow his grain from seed to fertilizer to diesel fuel. At the very bottom lies the consumer. The average American, who spends roughly 8 to 12 percent of her weekly paycheck on food, did not immediately feel the crunch of rising costs. But for the roughly 2-billion people across the world who spend more than 50 percent of their income on food, the effects have been staggering: 250 million people joined the ranks of the hungry in 2008,
//////////////////////////////////////////
this article explains why wall street is so dangerous to us all
PatrickforO
(15,134 posts)But if we realize as a people that we can turn that around so that banking and Wall Street serve the common need instead of enriching just a few, then we could make this country and this world a pleasure for everyone to live in.
Yank the Fed's charter, repeal the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and nationalize the central banking system. Ellen Brown has it right in 'Web of Debt.'
questionseverything
(10,314 posts)instead of enslaving us
people point to reagan as the turning point but it was actually 1913
PatrickforO
(15,134 posts)capitalism, there can only be one decision.
That is why I'm supporting Bernie Sanders.
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)I'm sorry to inform you that Sanders, bless his soul, is as capitalist as the day is long.
I like him a lot but let's be honest: Most Americans don't have the slightest idea what socialism is or what it means.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)but it needs to be neutered with socialism. Together they work. Alone they each have problems.
The Wizard
(12,988 posts)becomes totalitarian and in the end destroys itself.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)country WANT a Democratic Socialist Govt. And nearly half of all Americns would vote for Dem Soc candidate.
The old cold warriors don't understand that their propaganda doesn't work in today's world where people can educate themselves on what the world Socialist means.
totodeinhere
(13,418 posts)They are more concerned with making sure their cell phone gets charged. In fact a lot of them don't even know who Jimmy Carter or Richard Nixon are.
FarPoint
(13,729 posts)The republicans really want to run against Sanders.
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)A candidate like Bernie is uniquely qualified to expose the illegitimacy of the Republican Party. They in no way represent the will of the people, instead using wedge politics to win elections for their rich donors' interests. Since Hillary and other establishment Democrats are slightly better versions of the same process, the GOP lie is not exposed by most in our party, but Bernie can and will show how wrong they are.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)But 50% of Americans overall have a negative opinion of Socialism.
ChiciB1
(15,435 posts)Psst, I think it's gathering a LOT OF MOSS! And the numbers will grow larger for Socialism. We've only just begun to "talk about" Socialism in the las 7 to 8 months.
IT'S EARLY!
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)greymattermom
(5,797 posts)and now it just means society, like social medial, social security, social club. It used to be connected with Communism, but no one talks about that anymore. Those polls should ask folks what they think Socialism and Capitolism mean, and it's probably people vs banks and Wall Street.