HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Forums » 2016 Postmortem (Forum) » Who is going to be Bernie...

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 01:31 PM

Who is going to be Bernie's VP pick?

I would like to see Barbara Lee on the ticket.

56 replies, 3397 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 56 replies Author Time Post
Reply Who is going to be Bernie's VP pick? (Original post)
FlatBaroque Jan 2016 OP
litlbilly Jan 2016 #1
Ferd Berfel Jan 2016 #51
MuseRider Jan 2016 #2
saltpoint Jan 2016 #3
earthside Jan 2016 #4
FlatBaroque Jan 2016 #9
Nyan Jan 2016 #5
brooklynite Jan 2016 #7
fleur-de-lisa Jan 2016 #6
FlatBaroque Jan 2016 #22
fleur-de-lisa Jan 2016 #35
Hiraeth Jan 2016 #8
oasis Jan 2016 #10
LWolf Jan 2016 #11
Metric System Jan 2016 #12
thereismore Jan 2016 #26
Metric System Jan 2016 #29
thereismore Jan 2016 #30
Metric System Jan 2016 #32
pangaia Jan 2016 #33
fleur-de-lisa Jan 2016 #37
firebrand80 Jan 2016 #13
Fawke Em Jan 2016 #14
JI7 Jan 2016 #15
Bryce Butler Jan 2016 #52
restorefreedom Jan 2016 #16
fleur-de-lisa Jan 2016 #38
Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #17
in_cog_ni_to Jan 2016 #18
Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #19
FlatBaroque Jan 2016 #20
Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #21
valerief Jan 2016 #27
Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #28
valerief Jan 2016 #31
Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #36
dlwickham Jan 2016 #47
Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #48
dlwickham Jan 2016 #50
baldguy Jan 2016 #23
TIME TO PANIC Jan 2016 #34
baldguy Jan 2016 #41
TIME TO PANIC Jan 2016 #42
baldguy Jan 2016 #44
TIME TO PANIC Jan 2016 #45
baldguy Jan 2016 #55
TIME TO PANIC Jan 2016 #56
Pastiche423 Jan 2016 #24
FlatBaroque Jan 2016 #25
nsd Jan 2016 #39
FlatBaroque Jan 2016 #40
Nyan Jan 2016 #43
NCTraveler Jan 2016 #46
mythology Jan 2016 #49
Live and Learn Jan 2016 #53
FloridaBlues Jan 2016 #54

Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 01:38 PM

1. She would be great. I would like to see Elizabeth Warren but Barbara Lee works too:)

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to litlbilly (Reply #1)

Mon Jan 18, 2016, 05:52 PM

51. Luv Warren but we need her in the senate

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 01:43 PM

2. That is who I was thinking

would be good. She is wonderful.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 01:48 PM

3. I could see it being Rep. Lee. Definitely. eom

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 01:55 PM

4. It will likely be an unconventional pick.

But he is one smart politician, he knows how to win ... so it will be a very solid pick.

It could be Warren.

It could be former Interior Sec. Salazar.

It might not be a politician.

I would think someone from the west might be a good balancing choice.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to earthside (Reply #4)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 03:55 PM

9. I would be intrigued by a non-politician pick

Someone like Bill McKibben and put him in charge of a global environmental stewardship initiative.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 01:55 PM

5. Oh hell yeah...

I actually prefer her to Elizabeth Warren because of her foreign policy stance. And a former black panther at that? oh hell yeah...I would loooooove to see republicans' head explode!!!!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nyan (Reply #5)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 03:00 PM

7. And how many States would you be prepared to lose?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 02:38 PM

6. Love your suggestion!

I think it must be either a woman, a member of the LGBT community or a Person of Color. Or someone who covers a couple of these categories.

Bernie is running a non-traditional campaign and needs to select a non- traditional running mate. I love Elizabeth Warren, but as she is also from the Notheast, I don't think selecting her is a wise move. She will do more good in the Senate or in a Cabinet position.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fleur-de-lisa (Reply #6)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 08:02 PM

22. OMG...Treasury Secretary Elizabeth Warren

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Reply #22)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 09:04 PM

35. You are making me swoon!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 03:00 PM

8. John Bel Edwards

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 03:57 PM

10. Noam Chomsky.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 06:47 PM

11. I'd be thrilled with Lee.

I strongly hope it will be a woman. A woman who will make a great first woman president after Sanders' terms.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 06:53 PM

12. Santa Claus.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Metric System (Reply #12)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 08:36 PM

26. That would make it an all-male ticket and I know you'd hate that. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to thereismore (Reply #26)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 08:39 PM

29. Are you suggesting I'm only supporting Hillary because she's a woman? That's not the case.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Metric System (Reply #29)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 08:40 PM

30. I was. Tongue in cheek of course. I can't see any other reason why anyone would support her. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to thereismore (Reply #30)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 08:44 PM

32. Interesting.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to thereismore (Reply #30)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 08:49 PM

33. Kerspllert !!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to thereismore (Reply #26)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 09:05 PM

37. +1000

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 06:56 PM

13. Would HAVE to be a foreign policy expert IMO

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to firebrand80 (Reply #13)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 06:58 PM

14. Well, that rules out Clinton.

Every FP position she's taken has been horrible.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 07:02 PM

15. Joe Biden would be perfect but i dont know if he can stay on

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JI7 (Reply #15)

Mon Jan 18, 2016, 05:56 PM

52. He could if elected...

there are no term limits for VP

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 07:02 PM

16. i like nina turner but lee is good too.

keith ellison would be great but the rw wackos would make his religion a major issue.

fun to think about, but tough battles ahead first

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to restorefreedom (Reply #16)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 09:05 PM

38. Yes, Nina Turner! Love it!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 07:05 PM

17. Gavin Newsom. Kamala Harris. Jeff Merkeley. Earl Blumenauer. Barbara Boxer. Ron Wyden.

those are just a few ideas.

They all have one thing in common.

Any guesses as to what that is?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #17)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 07:24 PM

18. West Coast? n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to in_cog_ni_to (Reply #18)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 07:25 PM

19. Yeah, I'd like to see some broader representation both geographically and

generationally.

I think it's pretty clear our party needs to expand its leadership bench, going forward.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #19)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 07:56 PM

20. I believe we have plenty of leaders who have been pushed aside by corporate Dems

and who simply need an opportunity to lead. Barbara Lee is California BTW. I too agree with the geographical and generational diversity.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Reply #20)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 07:57 PM

21. Fair enough and what you said.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #17)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 08:38 PM

27. California! nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to valerief (Reply #27)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 08:39 PM

28. "West Coast", but, close.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #28)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 08:43 PM

31. Ha! I saw Newsom, Harris, and Boxer and took a guess. Wyden was Oregon, right?

Oh, well, the west coast is all California to me. You know, those CALIFORNIA VALUES. Hehehehe. (I'm Cruzin' for a brusin'.)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to valerief (Reply #31)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 09:05 PM

36. Merkeley, too.

I know, you guys think we're just a suburb of you, up here.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #17)

Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:03 PM

47. Hillary supporters?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dlwickham (Reply #47)

Mon Jan 18, 2016, 05:40 PM

48. Blumenauer has endorsed Hillary?

Really?

Hopefully next time he's in a room with her and Debbie Wasserman Schultz, they can have a conversation about Debbie's support for throwing sick people in prison over marijuana use.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #48)

Mon Jan 18, 2016, 05:47 PM

50. Harris and the others have I believe

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 08:19 PM

23. Ralph Nader

 

Bernie 2016 is like Nader 2000 on steroids - with the same apparent effects.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to baldguy (Reply #23)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 08:53 PM

34. Bernie is running on the democratic ticket, so he won't split the vote.

If Gore had actually motivated the base, it wouldn't have been close enough for Bush to steal. Don't blame Nader, he was filling a void.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TIME TO PANIC (Reply #34)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 09:18 PM

41. And how many here have been seduced by the RW lie machine to believe the worst about Clinton?

 

The bullshit that there's no difference between the Republicans and Democrats is exactly the same script Nader used to hand the 2000 coup d'etat into Bush's hands.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to baldguy (Reply #41)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 09:49 PM

42. The RW attacks on her are bullshit i.e. Benghazi, emails etc.,

but she's against single-payer, a living wage, legalization of marijuana, reinstating Glass- Steagall, and the list goes on. Her views are to the right of the base.

Nader didn't hand the election to Bush; it was stolen. If Gore had run further to the left, people wouldn't have felt the need to vote for Nader. How could Nader have predicted that it would come down to Florida and be stolen.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TIME TO PANIC (Reply #42)

Mon Jan 18, 2016, 07:23 AM

44. The same argument you use to defend Nader applies to Gore as well. "How could he have known?"

 

FL 2000 was stolen, sure. Nader helped. This is indisputable. The fact that 15 yrs later - with exposure of all the shit that he did, and all the shit he's still doing - he still has defenders here is outrageous.

My fear is that Sanders seems to be headed down that same path, handing the election & the country to Pres Cruz or Pres Trump on a silver platter.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to baldguy (Reply #44)

Mon Jan 18, 2016, 11:59 AM

45. Present some evidence to support you're claims, because this sounds like fear mongering to me.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TIME TO PANIC (Reply #45)

Mon Jan 18, 2016, 08:04 PM

55. You want me to *prove* Sanders will bolt the party?

 

You prove that he won't.

He's never been a Democrat before this past year, and the only reason he joined was to get the free money, expertise & exposure the party brings. Even so, he's practically declared war on the party just because everything hasn't gone 100% his way.

Plus, just like Nader he has a huge ego. If he looks to be losing the nomination, there's no reason to believe he won't.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to baldguy (Reply #55)

Mon Jan 18, 2016, 08:28 PM

56. Obviously, we must invest in mental health!


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 08:31 PM

24. I agree!

Barbara Lee is my #1 pick for VP.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Pastiche423 (Reply #24)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 08:32 PM

25. ...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 09:15 PM

39. I'll play.

Jim Webb.

I'm only half kidding.

If Sanders is to win -- not just the nomination but the White House -- he's going to have to demonstrate, in words and actions, that he represents something fundamentally new in American politics. He can't just be the old socialist guy or a representative of the old American left. That's the formula for 1972. That's losing big.

If Sanders is to win, it's going to be because he shatters preconceptions, because he makes people realize the game is rigged, because he forces them to think in new ways.

There's a lot of anger and unhappiness out there. Sanders represents one strain of that (what we usually think of as American liberalism). And Webb represents a different but related strain (whiter, more traditional, more social conservative, but just as discontented and for similar reasons). Merging those two strains would be a big deal.

Of course, this isn't a new idea. Lots of people have had the same idea. But it would be really something, really interesting, if finally -- finally -- Sanders could bring them together.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to nsd (Reply #39)

Sun Jan 17, 2016, 09:17 PM

40. Thought proving commentary

thank you

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to nsd (Reply #39)

Mon Jan 18, 2016, 01:32 AM

43. Very interesting take!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Mon Jan 18, 2016, 12:01 PM

46. I'm thinking a deal was struck between Sanders and Paul.

 

In the past, Sanders voted against Pauls "audit the fed" legislation. I don't see a clear evolution from Sanders on this one. It just doesn't make sense. I have a feeling there was a trade for his vote. I could see VP.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NCTraveler (Reply #46)

Mon Jan 18, 2016, 05:46 PM

49. Sanders isn't that stupid

 

He would be crushed if he nominated Rand Paul to be his VP.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Mon Jan 18, 2016, 06:12 PM

53. Per Western Illinois prediction, it will be O'Malley and he did pretty well in the debate.

I know, 2 northeastern white guys but they could work pretty damn well together and handily beat any of the Republican alternatives.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FlatBaroque (Original post)

Mon Jan 18, 2016, 06:24 PM

54. Alittle ahead of yourself I think.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread