Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 01:32 PM Jan 2016

Nate Silver perfectly summarizes the current media narrative for Hillary

From his Twitter:

*Clinton does something, anything, vaguely resembling the usual strategy of a candidate in a competitive campaign*

MEDIA: SHE'S PANICKING!!!

https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/688736262203686912

On the plus side, the media now have the groundwork for a resiliency story when they get bored of this narrative.

63 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nate Silver perfectly summarizes the current media narrative for Hillary (Original Post) Godhumor Jan 2016 OP
He's obviously sold out to the Clinton campaign sufrommich Jan 2016 #1
Did you forget DURHAM D Jan 2016 #3
"low information pollster" sufrommich Jan 2016 #4
Plus "oligarch" and "warmonger" Bleacher Creature Jan 2016 #27
Nate Silver can work his magic when floriduck Jan 2016 #53
So being a hypocritical liar is "the usual strategy"? Good to know what a cynical asshole Nate is. Green Forest Jan 2016 #2
"vaguely resembling the usual strategy of a candidate in a competitive campaign" MuseRider Jan 2016 #5
Thanks Nate for tipping your hand. That explains a lot, about your "analysis" 99th_Monkey Jan 2016 #6
He will be proven right -again- just wait and see lunamagica Jan 2016 #8
Nate is having a late-nite snack delivered to Mr. Silver on Feb. 1 99th_Monkey Jan 2016 #20
That is just nasty. Nate will be proven right on Feb 1. eom lunamagica Jan 2016 #26
Just like he was proven right about Trump not having an real support, and Chakab Jan 2016 #46
Any campaign would react to a significant drop in the polls. Jarqui Jan 2016 #7
Was it really a lie. . . enid602 Jan 2016 #28
That is so true! But then again, the media has to pretend there is a horse race lunamagica Jan 2016 #9
"competitive campaign" is the key here. They thought this was going to be a coronation. Motown_Johnny Jan 2016 #10
he's gay dsc Jan 2016 #12
Whats your point? Motown_Johnny Jan 2016 #14
me and my gay friends don't tend to crush on women dsc Jan 2016 #15
That word, you keep using it...... Motown_Johnny Jan 2016 #23
not in that way but she is very popular among gay men JI7 Jan 2016 #38
Some gay men, certainly not all of us. Bohunk68 Jan 2016 #48
I'm straight as an arrow, but I crush hard on Patrick Stewart. Ed Suspicious Jan 2016 #32
I am likewise straight but I’ve got a girl crush on Merrily :) dorkzilla Jan 2016 #49
Who doesn't? Ed Suspicious Jan 2016 #50
What's hilarious is now Sanders supporters want HIM to be handed to nomination KittyWampus Jan 2016 #18
Oh no, we know he has to win the first 2 contests to have a real shot. Motown_Johnny Jan 2016 #19
Then why all the whinging about Hillary & her 'attacking' poor Sanders KittyWampus Jan 2016 #21
Because he needs to win the first two contests to have a real shot. Motown_Johnny Jan 2016 #24
Because Democrats usually don't look favorability on outright lies and slimy tactics LondonReign2 Jan 2016 #31
Don't care about ":attacking"....Do care about lying Armstead Jan 2016 #36
+100 nt 99th_Monkey Jan 2016 #22
Please provide a link with qualified proof of that. SoapBox Jan 2016 #43
I will not hesitate to enunciate that I think Nate is great. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #11
You talk on stilts. Ed Suspicious Jan 2016 #33
heck, I'm disappointed. i thought it was going to be that she was the front-runner. Punkingal Jan 2016 #13
The media love nothing better than a horse race. BlueMTexpat Jan 2016 #16
Who is this we? Kentonio Jan 2016 #47
I notice that you have fairly recently joined the site. BlueMTexpat Jan 2016 #60
The majority of Hillary supporters were writing off Sanders as not have a chance in any state Kentonio Jan 2016 #61
Well, you can always hope. BlueMTexpat Jan 2016 #62
I completely agree about SC, and I've never wavered on that. Kentonio Jan 2016 #63
So true, so true. Had to laugh, it's so true. KittyWampus Jan 2016 #17
Is this another "poor Hillary" OP? Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2016 #25
More a "rolling the eyes at the coverage" post n/t Godhumor Jan 2016 #30
Nate is obviously an oligarch in the bag for Hillary. I have known this since I realized that he Squinch Jan 2016 #29
Yes...more Entrenched Establishment. SoapBox Jan 2016 #40
My post was a joke, son. Squinch Jan 2016 #42
Remember when Nate was a Libertarian? Lordquinton Jan 2016 #54
Remember how accurately Nate predicted the last presidential election? That HASN'T disappeared. Squinch Jan 2016 #57
Just like David Brock? Lordquinton Jan 2016 #59
There is obviously a conspiray behind this. Lil Missy Jan 2016 #34
She's not panicking? Z_California Jan 2016 #35
I will agree with half of that..... Armstead Jan 2016 #37
"...the usual strategy of a candidate..." SoapBox Jan 2016 #39
Interesting Kall Jan 2016 #41
And if she acts as if the race is not competitive firebrand80 Jan 2016 #44
He is giving you his impression. Agree or disagree, but his analysis has been still_one Jan 2016 #45
Nate is good at reading polls close to election day but he sucks at reading trends Quixote1818 Jan 2016 #51
he's right and he's slamming the herd mentality of the joeybee12 Jan 2016 #52
There has been a distinct change in her demeanor. Vinca Jan 2016 #55
The Clinton campaign is not panicking and is not that concerned Gothmog Jan 2016 #56
please, in shorter words. she is being GOREd. pansypoo53219 Jan 2016 #58
 

floriduck

(2,262 posts)
53. Nate Silver can work his magic when
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 04:30 PM
Jan 2016

all the traditional people and events are in place. But this year is a very unusual situation in both parties. So, instead of magic, Nate actually pulls a turd out of his top hat. Not his fault though since he's never had this situation to deal with.

 

Green Forest

(232 posts)
2. So being a hypocritical liar is "the usual strategy"? Good to know what a cynical asshole Nate is.
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 01:38 PM
Jan 2016

Sounds like the Clintons buttered his toast well.

MuseRider

(34,095 posts)
5. "vaguely resembling the usual strategy of a candidate in a competitive campaign"
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 01:42 PM
Jan 2016

therein lies the problem.

We are sick and tired of the usual. In our every day lives we don't act like this why would we want to be governed by people who consider this OK?

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
6. Thanks Nate for tipping your hand. That explains a lot, about your "analysis"
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 01:43 PM
Jan 2016

and how 'objective' it isn't.

 

Chakab

(1,727 posts)
46. Just like he was proven right about Trump not having an real support, and
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 03:52 PM
Jan 2016

falling out the primary by the fall?

Jarqui

(10,122 posts)
7. Any campaign would react to a significant drop in the polls.
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 01:46 PM
Jan 2016

It's how they react that distinguishes them.

Sending their daughter out to spew lame, obviously dishonest attacks on healthcare against a guy promoting single payer looks very desperate. A number of the Clinton campaign's recent actions look similarly. Thus, we get beyond the mere appearance of panic. The only question that remains is how much panic is going on with her and her campaign.

enid602

(8,596 posts)
28. Was it really a lie. . .
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 02:18 PM
Jan 2016

"If courts invalidate just that part of the hypothetical Sanders law, remember that the remainder of the bill would remain in effect. In other words, if the courts block a federal authority to set up a health insurance body in a state in which it is unwelcome, the defunding of Medicaid, Medicare, CHIP, and ACA exchanges remain in full effect, leaving the residents of those states - including their elderly citizens - with only private insurance as an option for health coverage."

http://www.thepeoplesview.net/main/2016/1/15/chelsea-clinton-was-right-everyones-health-care-is-threatened-under-bernies-plan

lunamagica

(9,967 posts)
9. That is so true! But then again, the media has to pretend there is a horse race
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 01:52 PM
Jan 2016

It's how the game is played.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
10. "competitive campaign" is the key here. They thought this was going to be a coronation.
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 01:52 PM
Jan 2016


It is starting to sound like Nate has a crush on Hillary.



 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
14. Whats your point?
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 01:57 PM
Jan 2016

A crush does not need to mean he wants physical relations.


Ever heard of a "Man Crush"? This looks like something similar to me. I honestly care nothing about his sexual preference and am a little disappointed that you brought it up.



 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
23. That word, you keep using it......
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 02:09 PM
Jan 2016
https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&rlz=1C1CHWA_enUS617US617&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=crush%20meaning


a brief but intense infatuation for someone, especially someone unattainable or inappropriate.
"she did have a crush on Dr. Russell"
synonyms: infatuation, obsession, love, passion; informalpuppy love
"a teenage crush"






Bohunk68

(1,364 posts)
48. Some gay men, certainly not all of us.
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 04:06 PM
Jan 2016

A Crush is not necessarily sexual in meaning. geez, any gay guy knows that.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
19. Oh no, we know he has to win the first 2 contests to have a real shot.
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 02:05 PM
Jan 2016

We just think that his positions are so far superior to Hillary's that he deserves to win.


 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
24. Because he needs to win the first two contests to have a real shot.
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 02:10 PM
Jan 2016

Did you not read the post you are responding to?


LondonReign2

(5,213 posts)
31. Because Democrats usually don't look favorability on outright lies and slimy tactics
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 02:29 PM
Jan 2016

The Clinton campaign and large swaths of her supporters seem to have no problem with them though.

BlueMTexpat

(15,365 posts)
16. The media love nothing better than a horse race.
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 01:59 PM
Jan 2016

When one doesn't really exist, they will create it. Nate is spot on.

We have always known that IA and NH would be close. There might even be a couple other states that will go for Bernie if he wins BIG in IA and NH. If he doesn't win or doesn't win BIG in these two, possibly none. But in the majority of states remaining, even if he wins IA and NH, the task ahead of him is daunting - to say the least.

When one has not been a member of a mainstream party for the whole of one's political life, but then throws one's hat in the ring for a Presidential election as a member of that party and uses the party's resources, all the while bashing the party establishment/leaders and not contributing to down-ticket races, one should not be surprised when the party does not wholeheartedly rush to support that candidate.

Just sayin' ...

 

Kentonio

(4,377 posts)
47. Who is this we?
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 04:01 PM
Jan 2016

Because I seem to recall months of being told that Bernie wasn't going to come close in any state. His ceiling seems to move more often than Hillary's policy positions.

BlueMTexpat

(15,365 posts)
60. I notice that you have fairly recently joined the site.
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 07:42 AM
Jan 2016

Even counting for lots of years of lurking before joining, either you have been reading selectively or you have not noticed that the majority of HRC supporters have always characterized the states of IA and NH as anomalous in many ways from the 48 others, and thus more likely to provide a close race for any serious challenger.

These two states are first and thus given disproportionate attention by the media, despite their anomalies. Clinton could still win these, especially in IA. With NH's Independents as likely to vote in the GOP primary as in the Democratic, the polls might be overstating Bernie's lead over Hillary there.

The thing is that, considering the anomalies in these two states, Clinton can afford to lose either or both and still have a much greater chance (much more than 50% - Nate predicts 66% based on polls-only) of securing the Dem nomination than Bernie. Bernie MUST win or he will have very little momentum to carry over into a battle that will become very lopsided.

I am not sure why you want to be a bit snarky about this. It is nothing but the truth. You can likely find at least one person who was telling you different things if that's what you're bent on doing, but I was not one of them, nor were the majority of HRC supporters.



 

Kentonio

(4,377 posts)
61. The majority of Hillary supporters were writing off Sanders as not have a chance in any state
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 08:30 AM
Jan 2016

As recently as Aug/Sept.

As for the effect of Iowa and NH, it has always been the case that Bernie has to win them. The thing is though that will his existing surge of momentum, the additional media momentum of wins in those states, could very easy change the entire complexion of the race, which is what has Hillary so worried at present. It could be enough to flip Nevada, and then its anybodies race. Hillary desperately needs some momentum, and the only way she gets that is either holding Iowa which looks increasingly likely or scoring a big win in either Nevada or SC. If they are even close wins for Hillary, the race doesn't look good for her.

BlueMTexpat

(15,365 posts)
62. Well, you can always hope.
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 08:52 AM
Jan 2016

And it is definitely true that until actual votes are cast, it's looking like a very close race in both. It likely will still be even then.

You are perhaps overstating "the majority of Hillary supporters" as "writing off" Sanders. I very much doubt that you saw my name among them and I doubt that the supporters you saw represented the majority. But political hyperbole is often an outcome of passion for one's candidate and it's good that you are passionate about yours.

Actually, in Aug/Sept, I liked Bernie a lot better than I do right now. I still believe that he is an excellent candidate, but his supporters' constant trashing of my candidate has colored my POV. It's been a real turn-off.

I also don't believe that Hillary is "worried," as the media would like to make you think. And she won't be going away at all. As for Bernie's winning NV, meh - we'll see, but it's possible that he could have a strong showing there. I'm a Westerner by birth and my granddaughter currently lives in Las Vegas. The Dem women I know there are firmly in Hillary's court. However, for SC to go BIG for Bernie would take a miracle, IMO. So in SC, yes, you see me as much more confident about Hillary.

 

Kentonio

(4,377 posts)
63. I completely agree about SC, and I've never wavered on that.
Mon Jan 18, 2016, 10:07 AM
Jan 2016

If he wins SC then Hillary may as well just pack up and go home. The very best I hope for there is a close defeat, say within 10.

Squinch

(50,918 posts)
29. Nate is obviously an oligarch in the bag for Hillary. I have known this since I realized that he
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 02:19 PM
Jan 2016

doesn't use internet polls in his analysis.

Squinch

(50,918 posts)
57. Remember how accurately Nate predicted the last presidential election? That HASN'T disappeared.
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 05:45 PM
Jan 2016

And anything else is beside the point.

Z_California

(650 posts)
35. She's not panicking?
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 03:07 PM
Jan 2016

I've never seen a Democratic candidate use right wing attacks prior to the first primary. What should it be called when a candidate does that?

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
37. I will agree with half of that.....
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 03:13 PM
Jan 2016

Lying should not be standard operating procedure for a campaign and candidate. Nor shold it be condoned or excused.

BUT

Yes the medias loves a contest. I'm sure they're preparing the "comeback" stories, regardless of what happens.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
39. "...the usual strategy of a candidate..."
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 03:41 PM
Jan 2016

You mean like...

Flip Flopping and/or copying the stances of your competition?

Sending your daughter out to attack your competition with lies?

...shit like that?

Uh huh.

Kall

(615 posts)
41. Interesting
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 03:43 PM
Jan 2016

What does making dishonest attacks about universal health care that one would expect from Ted Cruz, saying Bernie Sanders would take peoples' health care away, and sending her child out to do the same qualify as? Even-tempered, rational, calculated, clear-headed strategy?

If it actually is even-tempered, rational, calculated, and clear-headed strategy, then that's evidence of an even bigger and more disturbing problem.

still_one

(92,061 posts)
45. He is giving you his impression. Agree or disagree, but his analysis has been
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 03:46 PM
Jan 2016

pretty accurate in the past

Quixote1818

(28,919 posts)
51. Nate is good at reading polls close to election day but he sucks at reading trends
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 04:21 PM
Jan 2016

He completely blew it on Trump's resilience and he very well could be under estimating Sanders. Lets be real, Clinton would NOT have gone negative if the polls were not tightening up.
 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
52. he's right and he's slamming the herd mentality of the
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 04:23 PM
Jan 2016

Media. But look at Bernie supporters taking offense. .they're getting ridiculous

Vinca

(50,237 posts)
55. There has been a distinct change in her demeanor.
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 04:53 PM
Jan 2016

If Nate hasn't observed that, we can guess who he's voting for.

Gothmog

(144,941 posts)
56. The Clinton campaign is not panicking and is not that concerned
Sun Jan 17, 2016, 05:18 PM
Jan 2016

I am also amused by Nate's comments

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Nate Silver perfectly sum...