2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI am sick to death of the idea that Democratic women must support Clinton
I am a 50-ish woman living in the South. My only child is female. I have 2 sisters and 1 brother. My entire family, including my elderly mother and my somewhat republican sister, as well as all my nieces and nephews (including 1 gay nephew), all support Bernie.
Most of my family are middle-class, working Americans. No one in my family supports Hillary.
She does not represent my interests, as a woman. As a matter of fact, her high standing with Wall Street and Corporate America works against me and my whole family. Most of us are college-educated, but don't believe that Hillary is working for us.
I own my home, have a 401k account, and have done everything that Corporate America says I should have done to secure my future, while the Wall Street fucks continue to steal from my retirement account.
I am somewhat comfortable TODAY, but have no confidence that this level of comfort will continue under a Hillary presidency. She is not working for me or my family. I want a better future for my daughter and my nieces and nephews.
Hillary supporters, don't presume that you speak for me! You don't!
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Nobody is holding a gun to your head.
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)supporting Bernie over Hillary. Why?
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)How is that in any way, shape or form appropriate?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)Looking for honest dialogue.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)How do you not understand the pressure put on women? Not a woman, then you wouldn't get it.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)why should I support her?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)And there are more eloquent posters than I.
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)Squinch
(50,913 posts)It's good to see you back around here.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Squinch
(50,913 posts)It's chilly in here! We have to hold onto each other!
I know that we are in the same general area. Are you watching our first snow out there?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)Justin, you are one of the most eloquent and sincere...
It's good to see you back around here.
Squinch
(50,913 posts)CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)!
7962
(11,841 posts)That phrase has been around for who knows HOW long
Squinch
(50,913 posts)fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)Squinch
(50,913 posts)you that you have to vote for Hillary because you are a woman, and yet you are sick to death of all the people here who are doing that. Of whom there are none. Silly.
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)regarding my statement that I feel pressured from people on the Internet that imply that I owe allegiance to Hillary?
Squinch
(50,913 posts)fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)Why is my opinion silly? This is a public discussion board.
Squinch
(50,913 posts)for you?
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)Squinch
(50,913 posts)fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)Squinch
(50,913 posts)fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)Is not really an aduquate answer now, is it?
Squinch
(50,913 posts)Cali Democrat said you should vote for whoever you want, and no one was holding a gun to your head.
You took great offence to her use of that common figure of speech, and seemed to be trying to start a fight that didn't exist. THAT was silly.
No one said your opinion that people are saying you have to vote for Hillary is silly. I am saying, though, that no one is telling you that you have to vote for Hillary.
So why are you thinking that people are telling you something that they aren't telling you?
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)You are reaching. I stated an opinion and you and others of your ilk seem to believe I am not entitled to that opinion. When I ask for clarification, I am told, throughout this thread, that my opinion is silly. Even though, when requested down thread, I stated my reasons for my thoughts. It seems that some here don't think I am entitled to my opinion, even though I have clearly stated my reasoning.
Squinch
(50,913 posts)Show me where anyone said that.
And again, why are you bemoaning a situation that doesn't exist, namely people telling you you have to vote for Hillary because you are a woman?
I am perfectly willing to be proved wrong on that. If the posts telling you that you have to vote for Hillary because you are a woman are numerous enough to make you sick to death, surely you can produce one or two so we can see what you are talking about.
So prove me wrong. Let's get on the same page here. Produce a post or two that tells you that you have to vote for Hillary and that are so numerous as to make you sick to death.
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)Read down thread.
Squinch
(50,913 posts)that they are saying that when no one is?
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)NO! Look for yourself.
Squinch
(50,913 posts)fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)Squinch
(50,913 posts)fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)Lots of excellent replies from Bernie supporters!
Please respond again!
Squinch
(50,913 posts)for Hillary!
Because some people seem to think that people are saying that.
I wonder why they think that, but so far no one has come up with any answers.
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)Thanks again!
Squinch
(50,913 posts)all, there ought to be a lot of them. If you came up with posts from anyone who was trying to force you to vote for someone you didn't want to vote for, I would support you in telling them it was wrong to do that.
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)Thank you!
Squinch
(50,913 posts)fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)Kickety kickety kick kick kick! Thanks!
Squinch
(50,913 posts)fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)I have to go feed my feline friends. I adopted a blind feral kitten, as well as her sister and mother. It takes a while to feed them, along with my old man cat. Be back soon! Love ya, Fleur.
Squinch
(50,913 posts)fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)(may I call you Squinchy? I feel we have bonded over the last few hours.)
I will not now or EVER do your homework for you, as much as I love you! Reading comprehension is your friend! Give it a try!
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Squinch
(50,913 posts)them, and you won't produce them, so you haven't given anyone any reason to believe that they exist.
Still not sure why you said they do. Why do you say that?
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)I have answered everything you asked, or told you where to find the info. And still you persist. Please have a drink or two before the debate. I think you need it!
And bless your little heart!
Squinch
(50,913 posts)you have to vote for Hillary?
And though you told me that people in this thread were saying that you shouldn't voice your opinion, that simply isn't true. No one in this thread said anything of the sort.
You have provided nothing to back up any of your statements of how others are mistreating you!
I ask and ask, but there is nothing.
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)Squinch
(50,913 posts)imaginary people who are stifling your voice and your choices?
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)Thanks again for the kicks!
Squinch
(50,913 posts)fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)Squinch
(50,913 posts)fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)Please don't stop!!!
Squinch
(50,913 posts)someone who doesn't back up ANY of her statements.
I truly pray that you get a handle on all your imaginary enemies who don't let you voice your opinions and all those posts that don't exist where people order you to vote for Hillary. And there are so many posts in this thread, and lots of recs. I'm sure that means a lot to you.
But I'll leave you with this thought before I go: even if you are tormented by voices in your head that are ordering you to vote for Hillary, you can say no. It's really not a big deal.
Good night!
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)Are you single, by any chance? You make my heart flutter!
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)I'm going to make a frivolous claim, and NOT back it up with any sources. The onus is on the person making the claim, not the one asking for proof.
kristopher
(29,798 posts)Squinch is engaged in harassment for one reason and one reason only - fleur-de-lisa's rejection of the pressure on her as a woman to support Hillary. That is 'lisa's perception and doesn't require "proof". The unrelenting demands by squinch are nothing other than a form of harassment brought to bear for lisa's crime in publicly stating her rebellion.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)could make their own choices.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)Get a spine, and quit whining about people making posts on an anon bb, trying to voice their personal opinion.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Why else does she think women should vote for her over Sanders?
murielm99
(30,717 posts)in spite of the whining and nay-saying in this thread.
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)Why is it that when a woman states the reasons for which she is not supportive of Hillary, it is considered to be whining?
emulatorloo
(44,066 posts)Great to hear you are voting for Bernie
kath
(10,565 posts)They get sent on many forced vacations from DU, but keep coming back.
Squinch
(50,913 posts)saying that you have to vote for her because she is a woman, though no one is saying that.
You are bemoaning a situation that doesn't exist. Is that a better way to put it?
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)Try again.
I don't want more war over silly conflicts. Hillary is a war hawk.
I want much more oversight on the banking industry and Wall Street. Hillary doesn't.
I want income equality. Hillary merely parrots Bernie's positions regarding this.
I want my country to give a shit about poor people and homeless people. Hillary doesn't.
I want reforms to highet education, particularly free tuition. Hillary doesn't.
Squinch
(50,913 posts)no one here is doing that.
And then when people pointed out the fact that no one here is doing that, you told them that they were trying to stop you as a woman from talking about why you don't want to vote for Hillary. Even though they were doing nothing of the sort.
Why do you feel the need to bemoan a situation that doesn't exist?
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)It doesn't? Okay then.
Squinch
(50,913 posts)because she is a woman. So far I don't see any.
And I was not committed to Hillary till very recently, and I never saw any such posts, and as a woman I would have.
So why do you feel that they exist when they really don't?
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)Squinch
(50,913 posts)come up with the proof.
So again, why are you bemoaning the existence of something that doesn't exist?
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)Squinch
(50,913 posts)murielm99
(30,717 posts)when it IS whining.
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)Ugh!
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)I am "whining"? I merely stated my opinion. How is that "whining"?
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)are you telling me that only women whine? I find that very sexist.
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)It's a big fat whopping pile of crap.
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)lecture her.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)chervilant
(8,267 posts)Quite a number of people on this very forum have made snide comments to and about female DUers who are supporting Senator Sanders instead of HRC. Those of us who ARE supporting Bernie already have a spine, and it's well within our rights to comment on the crass attacks we've witnessed/experienced.
Much as I'd like to see a woman as POTUS, I do NOT want to see HRC as POTUS--and, not only because of her ties to Wall Street. However, if--by some stretch of the imagination--HRC becomes our nominee, I will hold my nose and vote for her. Then, I'll hope like hell that she does more for the 99% than her buddies on Wall Street.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)chervilant
(8,267 posts)Typical usage of absolutes to refute someone else's experiences...
Welcome to my IL.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Good grief!
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)You seem to be upset that I am stating my opinion. Why?
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Nobody gives a shit who you vote for but you seem to think they do.
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)And very mature!
Skittles
(153,113 posts)we ARE supposed to be interested in who people are voting for and why
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)manufactured outrage.
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)MrWendel
(1,881 posts)your desperately looking to be offended. Manufactured outrage when you can't even come up with a viable source for your argument.
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)And there was nothing desperate about it. Why do you consider a post by a woman to be 'desperate'?
Bleacher Creature
(11,252 posts)BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)Skwmom
(12,685 posts)dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)Theyre all voting for Bernie, including some independents that usually vote Republican.
Actually let me update that - I dont know a solitary person voting for Hillary, irrespective of sex.
cheapdate
(3,811 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Voting for a woman because she is a woman is exactly like voting for a white man because he's a white man.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)I'm a woman in her late 40s living in the south. I have a son and a daughter.
I agree with everything you said!
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Oh wait, no one is saying that.
Never mind.
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)'Joe Philly' as your moniker. This meme is all over FB and DU and has been for weeks. If you fail to recognize it, that may be due to the fact that you are a man. Not my problem.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)And I'm not saying THAT as a man.
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)that assuming women will vote for Hillary is a dumb meme. Thanks for your concurrence!
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts).... and getting upset about it.
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)I wrote that I am sick of people assuming that I owe allegiance to a candidate who doesn't represent me. My OP and all following responses have been logical and unemotional. Why do you use the term 'upset'?
bvar22
(39,909 posts)...in the Middle East, especially Iraq and Libya where the radical faction we "helped" have instituted Sharia Law.
And, of course, the hundreds of thousands of innocent women and children that were violently murdered or maimed from our Freedom Bombs.
For some, even in the Democratic Party, Brown People don't count.
Gman
(24,780 posts)That your family chooses to work against women. It's almost like supporting the war on women
How ridiculous.
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)Do your homework before you presume to lecture me.
Gman
(24,780 posts)And support Sanders?
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)I am a woman, my only child is female. I believe Sanders has a better record in supporting issues that are important to women. Why did you choose to misinterpret my OP?
Dr. Strange
(25,916 posts)Gmansplaining?
peacebird
(14,195 posts)Bernie is extremely strong on womens issues, and - guess what? As a woman myself I view the economy, climate change, and war/peace to all be issues that matter to women! Bernie is better on all issues that matter to me, and HE had the good judgement to see through and vote against the IWR. Unlike Hillary.
Response to peacebird (Reply #28)
Post removed
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Please explain. I can't for the life of me see how you got to that conclusion.
.
Green Forest
(232 posts)Awesome smackdown!
MissDeeds
(7,499 posts)My mother-in-law. The only reason she can give is that Hillary is a woman and she wants a woman to be president.
dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)Very happy to elect one of them the first woman president. Just because a woman wants to be president doesnt mean she should be.
draa
(975 posts)I've heard a few women on different forums like DU say that were voting for Clinton because she's a woman. Now I'm fine with their choice, and I support their right to make it, but if a men had said he was only voting for Sanders because he's a man? Well, we would be called sexists and chauvinists. Women would be calling us Republicans because that's the stuff they do. It's just strange that women get a pass on this when men likely wouldn't
MissDeeds
(7,499 posts)If gender is the litmus test, then Palin (if she were running) or Carly could be considered viable. It would be nice to have a woman, but she needs to be the absolute best possible candidate.
Frankly, I want the best damn 'person' for the position, regardless of gender. The stakes are too high.
chervilant
(8,267 posts)and she has stated unequivocally it's because HRC is a woman.
I have seen a number of posts castigating DUers who are supporting Senator Sanders, because -- apparently -- HRC is the "inevitable" one. I find that highly unlikely, given the surge in Sanders' supporters we're seeing.
FarPoint
(12,288 posts)I'm fine with that choice.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Are you required to put money into a 401k? Seems like an odd comment?
But you can vote for whomever you choose, that's for sure.
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)It's tax deductible and my employer matches my contributions, 100%, up to 4%.
If I put that money into a traditional bank savings account, I get almost nothing in interest.
But I am at the mercy of the unscrupulous tactics that Wall Street has devised to secretly charge fees to my 401k account. Never mind the volitility of the market due to the risky practices of Wall Street.
Perhaps I could stash my savings in my mattress?
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)But you want reward on your investment, in other words as long as it worked in your favor you'd be fine with it. Except it's doesn't always work in your favor, you could also reallocate your 401k into bonds which are much more secure but again have a smaller upside.
Maybe you should reallocate?
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)The greedy assholes on Wall Street still hold all the cards. Either I don't participate or I am subject to the laws they implemented to favor themselves.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)ETA: I'm mosty stocks and will retire near 2050, I have had an 11.8% return on my investment plus my 4% employee match. It's certainly not a bad return so far...
Sure it's not a pension and I get that but I think people should really reallocate if they aren't seeing a return.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)And in the tIRA you could use a low-cost provider like Vanguard. Doesn't help with the volatility, but the cost-cutting provides enormous advantages in getting the best return.
Just something to keep in mind.
Of course, you may not want to leave your job.
Squinch
(50,913 posts)Blanks
(4,835 posts)Bummer.
I'm glad that there aren't any ideas out there that make me 'sick to death'.
Because that would surely suck.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Isnt that nice?
You have no doubt been added to the "lists", now, though. This will go on your permanent record.
Oh, you can be sure of that.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)RandySF
(58,488 posts)And other Clinton supporters that make up the majority of Democratic women.
Karma13612
(4,541 posts)Very nice diary!
#Bernie16
dem in texas
(2,673 posts)When she ran against Obama back in 2008, I did not support her and voted for Obama. Back then, I was so against her vote to go to war in Iraq. I still don't like the idea that she did that - but the most important thing for the Democrats this time around is to have a candidate who can win and I don't Bernie can do it. I love what he says and he seems to be a nice, honest person, but the stakes are too high to let your heart guide your vote. For this election, you need to let your brain rule and think about all the things that could happened if a Repub wins - like another Scalia on the Supreme court, like ending Obamacare, like getting into another war, like more restrictive laws against abortion, more laws that give tax breaks to the rich, this list could go on and on. Democrats need to look at the big picture and vote for the Democrat who can beat Republican candidates like Trump, Cruz or Rubio. I don't care if it is a male or female, it just so happens in this case, I am voting for a female.
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)and the futures of my daughter, nieces and nephews are guiding me.
And that is precisely why my vote still goes to Bernie!
840high
(17,196 posts)daughter and 2 grandsons. Bernie!!!!
djean111
(14,255 posts)with the assertion that of course the women would vote for her because she is a woman. Which is, IMO, about as sexist and misogynistic statement, because it implied that we women did not care about issues and past actions, all we cared about was the ovaries, a bunch of statements/speeches, and some polls and how much Hillary wanted to be president. Mostly, though, because Hillary is a woman. Throw in a long long list of stuff Hillary has said at one time or another, trotted out as "accomplishments".
We were even told by one poster (I have not seen lately) that the only reason anyone did not support Hillary was because we were afraid of strong women or because (seriously) we had mommy issues. I went from being pissed off to being incredulous at the tone-deafness of it.
I didn't feel like I was being TOLD to vote for Hillary because I was a woman, but was being told that if I did not support Hillary, there must be some problem I have with a woman as candidate. That just started sounding really really stupid. And I have not met one woman who is going to vote for Hillary.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)And when she's forced to compete on the basis of actual policy positions, she flounders.
djean111
(14,255 posts)zentrum
(9,865 posts)None of the women, myself included!
crim son
(27,464 posts)I believe the U.S. is ready and able to vote for a woman for POTUS, if she's the right woman, and not simply because she's female.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)I have no intention of voting for Sanders (in the primary), no matter how much Hillary is trashed on this site. Vote for anyone you want.
Gee..........
Squinch
(50,913 posts)Beacool
(30,247 posts)I don't get why some have to act like the party is putting a gun to their head and forcing them to vote for Hillary in their state's primary. Frankly, I don't give a flying fig who they vote for.
Squinch
(50,913 posts)get to the bottom of why someone would do that, but so far no luck.
seaglass
(8,171 posts)for the Recs and number of responses. Some people are really into that.
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)But thanks for the kick!
Tanuki
(14,914 posts)sees the drama. The actress on the stage doesn't.
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)calls it 'drama'. Typical.
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)as telling people hey males. you gotta vote Male and white if your white. and if your voting for someone who's black only blacks can vote for blacks. Thats not how it works!!! smh. if I was a single issue voter I have a feeling I'd be voting Republican. But I'm not. Republican or Democrat I'll vote for whoever is best for the job..
joanbarnes
(1,721 posts)AT ALL.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)I've had at least one woman try to bait me with, "I can't understand why EVERY SINGLE woman I talk to doesn't support having a woman for president!"
I don't have to say a thing. They've stated what the goal is for themselves. I don't have to tell them that to support women, and every single person who has a right to have health care, have time with bringing a new life into the world, having pay equity and a minimum wage that is not a poverty wage would be the best way to support any woman running for president.
These are qualities for those who really care about women. The vehicle of leadership should qualitatively support the United States of America. It should not be limited by the sex of the leader.
martalcd
(42 posts)I agree with you 100%. I'm another life-long progressive Democrat who isn't a fan of Hilary. She doesn't represent me, either, or any of my struggles. After Chelsea saying all the mistruths about Bernie and Medicare, none of the Clinton family deserve to be elected to office. They lack ethics and morals if they spread lies like that.
401K plans are nothing but a tactic to steal more money from the 99%. I've worked since I was 13 part-time, and since I was 18 full-time...I'm no farther along than any other middle class person. You watch while your husband is on Workmen's Comp, getting less than he made before he was hurt, while the insurance company his employer uses for this pockets part of the money. You picket for your job during a strike, which takes you years to recover from. It's all stacked against the 99%.
Bernie may not be able to correct everything but he's trying to be as honest as he can be and will do what he can. I've always been a fan of his, from his days being interviewed from the Senate building by Ed Schultz to today.
Marta
Codeine
(25,586 posts)But it seems they mostly do.
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)Lots of my female (and some male) work and personal acquaintenances spouting the 'you must vote for Hillary cause she's a woman' meme. My family and I don't agree. I want a better future for the next generation.
seaglass
(8,171 posts)of friends and acquaintances.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)I am in my late 60's, no daughters, but two grown sons. I also have two sisters.
Over and over again I have seen it either explicitly said or strongly implied (and no, I'm not going to scroll through hundreds of posts on this topic) that women ought to all be supporting Hillary. Yeah, I'd love to see a woman as President in my lifetime, just not Hillary Clinton.
Here's something else that back last spring and summer was either said or strongly hinted at: Republican women by the millions would of course cross party lines and vote for Hillary Clinton, the inevitable Democratic nominee. That meme has largely disappeared, but I'm not sure to what extent her most fervent supporters do not fully understand how very hated she is outside of a relatively small circle. And no, I'm not suggesting any of us here on DU hates her. But not very many support her. And those who do over and over come back to the question, Don't you want to vote for the first woman President? Of course, I'd love to. Just not Hillary.
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)But I'd like a candidate who push the country further to the left. For too long the country has been moving to the right. Voting for President Obama was what I hoped would begin the pendulum swing back to the left. I voted for President Obama in 2008 because I felt he was to the left of Hillary Clinton. I still feel that way. I want the country to continue moving to the left. It pains me to hear Hillary argue against Single Payer and against Bernies plan to make college education debt free.
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)Tikki
(14,549 posts)these Democratic women have ever expressed to me that I have to vote for a women because
I am a women.
But, maybe, it is because of where I live and all.
Tikki
WillyT
(72,631 posts)zwyziec
(173 posts)will you vote for the Democrat Party nominee, or will you not vote and let the Repugs have the presidency? If it's the latter, you will be in big financial trouble. Save your money.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)You do realize there are alternatives to not voting right?
-you can write in your choice if your choice is not on the ballot
-you can leave the presidential spot on the ticket not filled in and vote down ticket
-you can vote third party for president and vote for Democrats down ticket or just say "fuck this shit" and vote third party
-and while I think this is the worst option anyone could take someone might think voting Republican would send a stronger message to the DLC
IMO I think Hillary will destroy the Democratic Party by driving away even more people. Right now Independents are the largest voting block. I think Hillary would increase their numbers by 15%.
I think if Donald Trump is nominated by Republicans he will destroy the Republican party. Unfortunately he will destroy nearly everything else along the way.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)I've never been told I had to support Clinton because I'm a woman.
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)If you don't agree, fine.
Tikki
(14,549 posts)for President? Does that, also, include Ms. Warren for President?
Nobody is following anyone into the booth, mail box, computer screen as they vote for
whom ever they please.
Tikki
Buzz cook
(2,471 posts)Personal demands made on you because of your sex.
The polls strongly indicate that women that fit your demographic support Clinton. But you might not be aware that just because a poll indicates a majority of a group thinks one way, that doesn't mean all members of the group agree.
And a person pointing out a poll result is not demanding obedience to the results of that poll.
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)I posted an opinion based on my experiences. I feel no need to justify my opinion to you. Try again.
Buzz cook
(2,471 posts)nt
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)ambition. She will say and do anything to get elected, while being totally beholden to and on the side of the rich. Her gender is completely irrelevant to me. No thanks.
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)get the red out
(13,460 posts)I will hold my nose and vote for Clinton in the GE if I have to, but I am no fan of hers. It is rather sexist to assume a woman will vote for another woman no matter what. My 79 year old mother says she isn't voting if Clinton wins the primary. I hate that but it's hard to get her to budge.
fierywoman
(7,671 posts)I've been a feminist for about the last 55 years. I'm not a sexist -- I won't support a candidate because she has two breasts and a womb since she obviously is and works for the 1%. I've been for Bernie for a l-o-n-g time.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)Thespian2
(2,741 posts)In case the latest data has been missed...
the 1%er barely beats tRump...Bernie smashes him...
the 1%er LOSES to KKKruz...Bernie smashes him...
Seems as though the Dems need Bernie if they want to win the presidency...and perhaps gain control of the Congress and some of the Repukkkian states...
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)Although I hear a lot of "we should kick their asses" machismo support. Then there are a few guys who love her for her loyalty to a philanderer.
wildeyed
(11,243 posts)As is the idea that I only support Clinton we are both women.
This female Hillary Clinton supporter assumes that you know your mind and will vote for the candidate you think is best.
Lorien
(31,935 posts)and vote for anyone on the basis of gender. Feminism is about being treated fairly and evaluated objectively REGARDLESS of gender. Voting for anyone because they are a woman is anti-Feminism. It's about ideas, vision, track record and character, not X or Y chromosomes.
Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)Just don't anybody tell you otherwise.
That's liberation.
Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)CobaltBlue
(1,122 posts)
I am a 50-ish woman living in the South. My only child is female. I have 2 sisters and 1 brother. My entire family, including my elderly mother and my somewhat republican sister, as well as all my nieces and nephews (including 1 gay nephew), all support Bernie.
Most of my family are middle-class, working Americans. No one in my family supports Hillary.
She does not represent my interests, as a woman. As a matter of fact, her high standing with Wall Street and Corporate America works against me and my whole family. Most of us are college-educated, but don't believe that Hillary is working for us.
I own my home, have a 401k account, and have done everything that Corporate America says I should have done to secure my future, while the Wall Street fucks continue to steal from my retirement account.
I am somewhat comfortable TODAY, but have no confidence that this level of comfort will continue under a Hillary presidency. She is not working for me or my family. I want a better future for my daughter and my nieces and nephews.
Hillary supporters, don't presume that you speak for me! You don't!
There is no excuse for the United States having failed, so far up to this point in history, in not having elected a woman to the presidency of the United States.
This doesn't say specifically who must become the first woman president in the history of the United States. But, it should happen with the Democratic, not the Republican, Party. Republicans carry men before women. Democrats carry women before men. The last Republican president elected with stronger support from women than men, nationwide, was the 1956 re-election of Dwight Eisenhower.
I prefer Bernie Sanders over Hillary Clinton. It simply has to do with Sanders coming closer to where I am at politically and with respect for the direction I think the nation needs to take.
I will not engage in trashing Hillary Clinton. I don't have to do that. I don't make my living in politics.
After the primaries are over, and the two parties have their nominees, what will happen is that there will be overwhelming support from self-identified Republicans and self-identified Democrats who will vote for their party's nominee in the general election. This is not assumed. It is what typically happens. Even a losing candidate will get at least 85 percent of the vote from his self-identified partisan voters.
This time of the year is primary mode. I don't expect to see everyone playing nice within the party. (They're not doing that on the Republican side as well.)
This is actually good!
BlueMTexpat
(15,365 posts)presume that I am not a progressive because I believe that Hillary Clinton is the most comprehensively qualified candidate. That she happens to be a woman is a bonus for me.
But I also happen to believe that a lot of the unhinged Hillary hatred here and elsewhere is driven by latent sexism.
You can certainly disagree with me, but no one can tell me with a straight face that a male candidate with the same intelligence, education, and experience of and in public office, along with the consistent championship of minority causes, that she has had at both the national and international levels would receive even a tenth of the slurs cast upon her on a daily basis.
Obviously, her experience as First Lady wouldn't apply to any male in this election.
Please, by all means, support whom you choose.
onecent
(6,096 posts)She would keep these wars in FULL FORCE.
Response to fleur-de-lisa (Original post)
yuiyoshida This message was self-deleted by its author.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Faux pas
(14,644 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)7962
(11,841 posts)Cause we all dumb down here, ya know?
At least thats the way a lot of folks here portray us!
LS_Editor
(893 posts)I have stated many times that Hillary Clinton asserting being a woman is a qualification for being president, and one she further asserts is a qualification other women should automatically see as the primary reason for voting for her, smacks of some pretty atrocious logic.
Using Hillary's logic, all women should vote for Carly Fiorina or demand Sarah Palin enters the presidential race.
Complete bullshit.
glinda
(14,807 posts)Progressive dog
(6,899 posts)they are told they must-subliminally.