2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI oppose the ACA as being both the beginning and the end
concerning healthcare. There is no way in the end the ACA will hold down costs. One reason is that subsidizing our health insurance industry with all its lobbying power will not end up cheaper in the long term than single payer. The 2nd is that the government is not negotiating prices on drugs on behalf of our citizens. In the end, millions will still be left out due to states being able to opt out of Medicaid expansion. There also isn't protection from repeal from political interests. My two cents. Therefore, I support Bernie Sanders's position.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)we're still litigating Obamacare just as we did for many years with MEDICARE and MEDICAID when enacted in 1965 as part of Johnson's Great Society's War on Poverty.
the current political landscape doesn't work right now for single payer healthcare. it doesn't mean it won't happen in 10 years but it's not going to happen as a result of this election cycle.
mmonk
(52,589 posts)I'm beginning to hear Democrats making the same arguments against single payer as Republicans, not that it just can't be done this election cycle.
emulatorloo
(44,115 posts)I'm addressing your statement about Democrats making the same arguments against single payer as Republicans.
Some Dems believe you can get from ACA to single payer. Some Dems don't. That is an ok discussion to have.
mmonk
(52,589 posts)by observing.
emulatorloo
(44,115 posts)I wasn't trying to be negative towards you by using the word "bias"
None of us are totally objective.
Just saying I felt your opinion might be acting as a filter and may be coloring your observations.
mmonk
(52,589 posts)as kicking solutions down the road.
emulatorloo
(44,115 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)As does every member of this site. As do all three of our candidates.
This is why I support Clinton for President.
Great point overall. The Democratic Party is the only sane place to be.
ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)This money should be given to health facilities in the couples area. They are healthy, so no using the health care, outside of yearly visit. So instead of it going into the health care system, it's going to INSURANCE COMPANIES!
They always want more, and it's the reason the ACA is not sustainable. But like Obama said, this is phase one. Now it's time to kick them out and put the money into the health care fund.
Then join the rest of the world in cost controls on pharmaceuticals.
After all of these years....the last 50, Hillary says she'll fix this now????? Really?
She has taken speech money from Health care companies who don't want single payer. That's why she's flip flopping back and forth on this.
All of their millions....why do her and Bill use Medicare? Why not buy a private policy from one of their friends? And pay for it? They have been enriched by the government and they continue to take more. After watching her after SEC stint, and listening to her now, I can never vote for her.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)it does nothing to advance the discussion
bvar22
(39,909 posts)but at the debate, Hillary acted like it was sacrilege to even talk about changing it.
Like you, I also opposed it at the time because I knew that the "First Step" was bullshit.
The 1% got exactly what it wanted,
and as long as we vote for Hillary or support other Conservative Democrats,
subsidizing the Health Insurance Industry with BILLIONS without a National Public Plan is Locked In.
I've always found it ironic that Obama campaigned on a Public Option with NO Mandate.
In fact, in a 2008 Campaign Debate, Obama ridiculed Hillary without mercy for supporting a Mandate with NO PUblic Option, but THAT is exactly what the ACA became AFTER Obama was elected.
Remember that wonderful moment where Obama attacked Hillary's Plan with,
"If Mandates worked, we could solve Homelessness by mandating that homeless people buy a house." (debate crowd: Hahahahahaha)
..AND, "a Public Option is necessary to keep them (Health Insurance) honest."
I wonder if Hillary ever got pissed when Obama passed HER Republican, For Profit, subsidize the 1%, Health Insurance Plan?
...but NOW insists that we can't change it?
mmonk
(52,589 posts)frazzled
(18,402 posts)And in specific ways. You apparently weren't even watching.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)Please document the changes in detail which parts of the ACA Hillary is going to change?
She certainly is NOT going to work for ANY National Public Option, or expanding MediCare.
And she certainly is NOT going to stop or reduce the BILLIONS in subsidies going to her friends in the worthless, For Profit Health Insurance Industry.
Until we get those parasites Out of The Middle and away from the Tax Payer dollars,
nothing much is going to change except the campaign Talking Points
So help me out here and give me some specifics.
Bernie has already done so.
mmonk
(52,589 posts)a comparison with Bernie's single payer proposition with repeal and replace positions of the Republican Party.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)the ACA ("Single payer would make the ACA and the president look bad!!!" . Some of us knew at the outset that was actually an impediment to SP.
Campaign Obama: "We have to have public option to keep the insurance companies honest"
President Obama: "You friends and family need those insurance jobs"