2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumPlanned Parenthood pushes back against Bernie's latest attacks!
By Eliza Collins
01/20/16 03:24 PM EST
Planned Parenthood and other progressive groups are calling out Bernie Sanders for referring to them as "part of the establishment," saying the Vermont senator needs to show a more explicit commitment to women's reproductive health.
"It's a little ridiculous to call an organization Congress and Republican presidential candidates have spent six months attacking establishment especially when Planned Parenthood health centers are out there every day ensuring millions of often marginalized Americans have access to basic reproductive health care, Dawn Laguens, executive vice president of Planned Parenthood Action Fund told POLITICO in an email.
Laguens said she was disappointed in Sanders comments.
It's regrettable and surprising to hear Sen. Sanders describe the very groups that fight on behalf of millions of often marginalized Americans people who still have to fight for their most basic rights as representing the establishment, Laguens said.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/planned-parenthood-bernie-sanders-218026
Help out Planned Parenthood and donate to them:
https://www.plannedparenthood.org/
randys1
(16,286 posts)how DC works will understand it, he may have been better off not taking on PP.
Too bad we are fighting among ourselves, we are the good guys/gals, folks.
Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)Welcome to the new age, where you (and I) aren't just wrong, but also EVIL.
MrWendel
(1,881 posts)your part of the establishment.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)MrWendel
(1,881 posts)not even Obama.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)kath
(10,565 posts)on PP for suggesting otherwise.
It was an utterly boneheaded move for them to endorse before a single primary vote has been cast, especially when all 3 Dem candidates are staunch advocates for reproductive choice. Stupid, stupid, stupid. (Plus there's the fact of Cecile's daughter working for the Clinton campaign...)
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)They've done this to themselves. There was NO reason for them to endorse during a primary. They did it because of cronyism - pure and simple. And I find that far more ridiculous than getting your nose out of joint because someone calls you "establishment."
Jeez, you'd think an organization so reviled by the right wouldn't let that small word bother them.
TM99
(8,352 posts)They are a health services organization first and foremost.
By endorsing in the primary when they never had so before, they entered the political ring.
By entering the political ring, they are now mixing it up in DC and pitting Democrat against Democrat. At the same time, the GOP is now emboldened to attack them harder. Not because Sanders intimated but never said they were acting in a status quo fashion, but because it is obvious that PP is a wing of the Democratic Party. It should be non-partisan even if it endorses AFTER the fucking primary.
Poor women are Democrats AND Republicans. Women who want an abortion are both Democrats AND Republicans.
Consequences people, consequences.
Stupid, stupid, stupid!
Tommy2Tone
(1,307 posts)Any person or organization who endorses Clinton is part of the machine.
Every day there is a drip, drip , drip of information that shows us the true Sanders and it's not good.
proglib
(7 posts)Do you mean to say that the Clintons were never part of the establishment? Hillary's husband was POTUS. Is that not establishment? The President of the United States of America. Not part of the establishment but an outsider who has nothing do with DC!
And then you have the Bush-Clinton Haiti Fund! The Clintons and Bushes are in it together!
Now that PP has revealed its support for Hillary, here is a suggestion: transfer all their functions related to healthcare to Bernie's proposed Single Payer system. That is how it should have been in the first place.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)DSB
litlbilly
(2,227 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)MellowDem
(5,018 posts)war-monger candidate that "came around" on gay marriage after the polls did.
What did they expect?
They just endorsed a candidate that marginalized millions of Americans when it poitically suited her and which voted for a war that left hundreds of thousand dead and lead the founding of such women loving groups as ISIS.
They endorsed a candidate that is against universal healthcare and for Wall Street.
Maybe they regret endorsing someone before the primaries are even done.
Number23
(24,544 posts)litlbilly
(2,227 posts)fly either. Good luck CD
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)seaglass
(8,171 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts).
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)1) A majority of Sanders supporters feel the "establishment" is the enemy.
2) Sanders called them the "establishment" full well knowing most of his supporters, and himself, view the "establishment" as the enemy.
I don't think him making these comments, Knowing a certain event in DC this weekend, are coincidence in any way.