Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BlueMTexpat

(15,365 posts)
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 06:34 AM Jan 2016

When "they" attack Hillary, "they" attack me ...

and these other people, many of whom have decades-long and well-documented credentials in fighting for the most vulnerable.

Here’s what 54 leading progressives think about Hillary Clinton

https://www.hillaryclinton.com/feed/heres-what-54-leading-progressives-think-about-hillary-clinton/

We can reasonably differ about which candidate we support. We can point out differences in their policies and contrast them, so long as those differences are accurately represented and not mere repetitions of GOPer talking points.

But what I have seen on DU, especially since 01 Jan 2016, are full-blown Clinton Derangement Syndrome OPs.

Let us PLEASE stop using DU as a vehicle to assist the GOP.

And before anyone posts the "but Clinton supporters do it too" excuse or some such, I would like them to find and link to anything derogatory that I have ever said about Bernie Sanders here or anywhere else. If you can't find it - and I am sure that you won't because I have never said anything derogatory about him - then please do not use that BS on me or in response to my OP.

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
When "they" attack Hillary, "they" attack me ... (Original Post) BlueMTexpat Jan 2016 OP
Hillary attacked me when she voted for the IWR. Sorry, but that can't be undone and there is no Live and Learn Jan 2016 #1
Ask yourself this question and think BlueMTexpat Jan 2016 #3
Never mind Bernie. Wilms Jan 2016 #10
I think he would have. Bernie has a long history of voting for what is right not what is PC. Live and Learn Jan 2016 #13
No, I don't need more. BlueMTexpat Jan 2016 #15
Thank you for yours also. nt Live and Learn Jan 2016 #20
She didn't just vote for the war she endorsed the invasion in 2003: beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #14
Fuck yes. You really have no clue as to who he is. Btw, Vermonter here cali Jan 2016 #18
card enid602 Jan 2016 #22
But pants on fire lying about everything about Bernie is OK? jfern Jan 2016 #2
Please link to anything I have ever said BlueMTexpat Jan 2016 #4
I don't know about you, but the Hillary campaign has been lying a lot about Bernie jfern Jan 2016 #5
You continue to express your BlueMTexpat Jan 2016 #8
What did I say about you? jfern Jan 2016 #17
You want to play both sides of the coin Kentonio Jan 2016 #19
This^^ darkangel218 Jan 2016 #21
Who is they? mmonk Jan 2016 #6
Well, I took the title from an OP BlueMTexpat Jan 2016 #9
I was curious since I took the Bernie mmonk Jan 2016 #12
It wasn't that clear to me. BlueMTexpat Jan 2016 #16
Here's a little something to go with your whine CBGLuthier Jan 2016 #7
That actually looks delicious. BlueMTexpat Jan 2016 #11
That's silly bigwillq Jan 2016 #23
Thank you for your response. BlueMTexpat Jan 2016 #24

BlueMTexpat

(15,365 posts)
3. Ask yourself this question and think
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 06:57 AM
Jan 2016

very seriously about the answer: If Bernie had been a recently-elected Dem Senator from NY in 2002 instead of a long-standing Ind Rep from VT in Congress, would he have dared to vote against the IWR?

More Dems voted for it than not, to our everlasting dismay. Hillary's was hardly the single vote that would have made the difference.

While Bernie's vote may still conceivably have been the same, please objectively remember the passions that were still running very high in NY even among Dem voters, especially after 9-11.

Clinton's IWR vote was not in support of the invasion of Iraq, although it has certainly been misconstrued as such by those who want to damn her for this single act. As a matter of fact, her IWR vote was one reason why she was not my preferred candidate in 2008.

Since then, however, she has certainly made up for that fumble and has said that her vote was wrong. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2014/06/05/hillary-clinton-on-iraq-vote-i-still-got-it-wrong-plain-and-simple/

For those here for whom that vote is set in amber, it may seem damning. But that single action does not offset her decades of public service in aid of the most vulnerable. Bernie likely regrets at least some of his own votes over the years even though he got this one very right, IMO.

 

Wilms

(26,795 posts)
10. Never mind Bernie.
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 07:19 AM
Jan 2016

If I could figure out what was going on, Clinton could have.

And no, she has not made up for that blunder. She never can. Hundreds of thousands of dead, injured, traumatized, orphaned, widowed and on and on.

Tired of the excuses.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
13. I think he would have. Bernie has a long history of voting for what is right not what is PC.
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 07:25 AM
Jan 2016

What we do know is that Hillary voted for it and Bernie against it.

Hillary is happy with the ACE and Bernie wants Single Payer.

The Clinton's have gotten huge sums of money from corporations and Bernie hasn't.

Hillary thinks $12 an hour is enough for minimum wage while CEO's rake in billions and Bernie wants to start at $15.

Bernie thinks education is important and should be easily and freely attainable by all and Hillary wants to keep it expensive so Trump's kids don't benefit.

Do you need more? I do have plenty more if needed.

BlueMTexpat

(15,365 posts)
15. No, I don't need more.
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 07:34 AM
Jan 2016

Thank you also for your courteous reply even though we still have different perspectives.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
14. She didn't just vote for the war she endorsed the invasion in 2003:
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 07:30 AM
Jan 2016
There is a very easy way to prevent anyone from being put into harm's way, and that is for Saddam Hussein to disarm, and I have absolutely no belief that he will. I have to say that this is something I have followed for more than a decade.

For now nearly 20 years, the principal reason why women and children in Iraq have suffered, is because of Saddam's leadership.

The very difficult question for all of us, is how does one bring about the disarmament of someone with such a proven track record of a commitment, if not an obsession, with weapons of mass destruction.

I ended up voting for the Resolution after carefully reviewing the information and intelligence I had available, talking with people whose opinions I trusted, trying to discount political or other factors that I didn't believe should be in any way a part of this decision, and it is unfortunate that we are at the point of a potential military action to enforce the resolution. That is not my preference, it would be far preferable if we had legitimate cooperation from Saddam Hussein, and a willingness on his part to disarm, and to account for his chemical and biological storehouses.

With respect to whose responsibility it is to disarm Saddam Hussein, I do not believe that given the attitudes of many people in the world community today that there would be a willingness to take on very difficult problems were it not for United States leadership.

http://dailykos.com/story/2008/3/2/467547/-


She parroted Bush's lies about Saddam harboring Al Qaeda:



"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members...

It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well, effects American security.

This is a very difficult vote, this is probably the hardest decision I've ever had to make. Any vote that might lead to war should be hard, but I cast it with conviction."


And in 2008 she claimed what we did to the Iraqi people was a "gift":

"And I believe that at the same time that we have to make clear to the Iraqis that they have been given the greatest gift that a human being can give another human being – the gift of freedom. And it is up to them to decide how they will use that precious gift that has been paid for with the blood and sacrifice and treasure of the United States of America."

https://dailykos.com/story/2015/11/30/1455533/--Iraqis-Were-Given-the-Greatest-Gift


To answer your question, yes I absolutely believe Bernie would have voted against the war no matter which state he was from, listen to him yourself:



http://www.c-span.org/video/?c4543960/bernie-sanders-speaking-persian-gulf-war-1991

BlueMTexpat

(15,365 posts)
4. Please link to anything I have ever said
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 06:58 AM
Jan 2016

here that is "pants on fire lying about Bernie."

You specifically ignored my request and went ahead and posted your own bias.

BlueMTexpat

(15,365 posts)
8. You continue to express your
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 07:14 AM
Jan 2016

disrespect towards me personally.

You have a lot of other threads where you can go to post this crap. I specifically requested that such not be posted in a response to this OP unless you could find something derogatory that I personally have said.

You're in full-fledged "some say" mode, which is exactly the kind of thing that appalls me here - on a Democratic website that was created specifically to elect and support Democratic candidates.

jfern

(5,204 posts)
17. What did I say about you?
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 07:45 AM
Jan 2016

What I said is that the Hillary campaign is attacking Bernie repeatedly with lies.

 

Kentonio

(4,377 posts)
19. You want to play both sides of the coin
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 08:02 AM
Jan 2016

On one hand you're castigating Bernie supporters en masse for attacking Hillary, and then saying no-one is allowed to point out the similar behavior from Hillary supporters because you personally haven't engaged in it.

BlueMTexpat

(15,365 posts)
9. Well, I took the title from an OP
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 07:17 AM
Jan 2016

posted by a Bernie supporter that had nearly the same title.

I at least put quotation marks around the "they" in a likely failed attempt at sarcasm.

mmonk

(52,589 posts)
12. I was curious since I took the Bernie
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 07:25 AM
Jan 2016

supporter to mean elected Democrats in office and party officials.

BlueMTexpat

(15,365 posts)
11. That actually looks delicious.
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 07:20 AM
Jan 2016

Thank you.

Exactly what part of my post do you characterize as "whine" and why?

You don't need to worry about real wine for me though. I live in the midst of an excellent wine-producing region and am actually looking at a vineyard as I write this.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»When "they" attack Hillar...