2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHRC is trying to convince us that this is it, we are fucked just
accept it and vote for me, because at least I will throw you little people a crumb or 2.
She's as demoralizing as any presidential candidate I've ever seen.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)JRLeft
(7,010 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)JRLeft
(7,010 posts)She's making it hard to vote for her in the GE if she's the nominee.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Flint, MI is the new business model for areas and populations that aren't going to be gentrified. HRC may as well call herself "USA Emergency Manager" and fire the rest of the government and rule by banker's decree.
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)It is the 1% that matter to most candidates... Not Bernie, he cares about the average person.
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)bucket list. By the way she gets follow through with her neoliberalism.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)I guess somewhere there was an actual quote from Hillary, but then it gets retold 100 different times in the Bernie world and comes out looking like this.
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)JRLeft
(7,010 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)tex-wyo-dem
(3,190 posts)The Repugs rule our destiny, no matter what; right?
merrily
(45,251 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Member of the Board of WalMart, founding member of the DLC, US Sneator who voted for every war and surge she could vote for, her neoconlike regime change advocacy, her weird laughter at the prospect of bombing Iran, etc.
See also Replies 22, 28, 29, 31 and 33 on this thread and many, many posts on this board.
That the Draft Warren movement and the crowds that surround Sanders scared her into talking more populist this time around than she did in 2008 or than she's ever behaved in her lifetime is nothing compared to well over 50 years of behavior.
Oh, and if you want to know why we else we don't take the latest "evolution" of Hillary at its word: both Clintons have lied to America, Bill under oath definitely once and, given Susan McDougall contempt sentence and the Paula Jones suit, probably more than twice. Her trustworthiness numbers are low and, IMO, for good reasons.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)And if you're good, tomorrow you can have mush.
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)wilsonbooks
(972 posts)JRLeft
(7,010 posts)Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)They sold the Democratic Party to the Corporatist Oligarchs Decades ago. But We're just supposed to forget that.
Do you think that this (below) had ANYTHING to do with: NAFTA, GATT, WTO, Telecommunications Act, ending welfare as we knew it, Glass-Stegall, etc, etc, up to, and including TPP?
The Rightwing Koch Brothers Fund the DLC
... the Koch brothers have also been funding the Democratic Leadership Council. Welcome fellow Democrat! ...
http://www.democrats.com/node/7789
Do deep-pocketed "philanthropists" necessarily control the organizations they fund? That has certainly been the contention of those who truck in conspiracy theories about the Rockefeller and Ford Foundations funding liberal and neo-liberal organizations. As for the rightwing, journalists such as Joe Conason and Gene Lyons uncovered that the "vast right wing conspiracy" -- or the New Right network of think tanks, media outlets and pressure groups -- was marshalled under rightwing billionaire Richard Mellon Scaife for his Get-Clinton campaign. Prior to the work of Conason and Lyons, Russ Bellant extensively documented in "The Coors Connection" how the Coors Family, Scaife and other wealthy rightwingers have funded the New Right movement since the early '70's. Among these rightwing benefactors are the Koch brothers. But the Kochs have been working both sides of the fence. As Bill Berkowitz writes, the Koch brothers have also been funding the Democratic Leadership Council.
According to SourceWatch, a project of the Center for Media & Democracy, the brothers are "leading contributors to the Koch family foundations, which supports a network of Conservative organizations and think tanks, including Citizens for a Sound Economy, the Manhattan Institute the Heartland Institute, and the Democratic Leadership Council."
Charles Koch co-founded the Cato Institute in 1977, while David helped launch Citizens for a Sound Economy in 1986.
This is no less stunning than if Scaife or the Coors family were funding the DLC. So do the Kochs just throw money at the DLC -
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)6chars
(3,967 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)workers in general, say her fellow members of the board. Her sole advocacy was on behalf of hiring women and equal pay for women. As badly as Walmart treated its workers in the 1980s, she did nothing else, even when the workers went on strike.
Or were you referring to the Koch brothers funding the DLC, of which she was a founding member? If so, be advised that the Koch brothers did not provide only initial funding. They also sat on the Executive Council of the DLC in its early days.
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)They helped found the DLC to take the Democratic Party right and they astroturfed/foounded the Tea Party to take the Republican Party even further right.
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)Faux pas
(14,657 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)applegrove
(118,577 posts)only is demoralizing. I don't think wanting a Dem in the White House is either.
merrily
(45,251 posts)How much hubris does it take to think your test for who is a Democrat is better than that of the DNC, Howard Dean, Chuck Schumer, the Democratic Party of the State of Vermont and the Secretaries of State of all the states that are allowing Sanders to run as a Democrat, including his home state?
Talk about a RW meme!
merrily
(45,251 posts)Or words to that effect, on national effing TV.
djean111
(14,255 posts)it is all amorphous campaign blather. ALL of it.
BigBearJohn
(11,410 posts)Odin2005
(53,521 posts)To her we are just pawns to be manipulated.