Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

madamesilverspurs

(15,800 posts)
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 04:18 AM Jan 2016

Clinton and Sanders: The 60’s and 70’s beyond the memes

Of all the memes that push all my buttons, is one with Hillary Clinton and Sanders with the question what were you doing in the 60s. The two are pictured in the sixties with Clinton reduced to her political identity from high school and her first year in college and Sanders framed as a front line warrior for civil rights. No context of time, no more information. Just the demonization Clinton in the eyes of “progressives” of all hues. This picture shuts down discussion, logic and in fact the real truth.

Just by looking at the picture, one immediately thinks, he was in the front lines fighting and she was coddled in the haven of Republican America working against social justice, civil rights and all that defines the left.

(snip)

Let’s start when they were born: Sanders was born 1941, Hillary was born 1947. So, 1965 Sanders was 24, Clinton was 18. Sanders graduated from the University of Chicago 1964, Clinton graduated from Wellsesley 1969.
...

read the rest
https://medium.com/breaking-down-onanti-hillary-meme-at-a-time/clinton-and-sanders-the-60-s-and-70-s-beyond-the-memes-159c3261c24d#.tmtts5201

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Clinton and Sanders: The 60’s and 70’s beyond the memes (Original Post) madamesilverspurs Jan 2016 OP
To me it says the 60-somethings are about to get a rude awakening Recursion Jan 2016 #1
Bear in mind that at least one battle from the 60's is still being fought Fumesucker Jan 2016 #3
Let's compare what the two candidates were doing in 1972, shall we? SunSeeker Jan 2016 #2
ZOMG! An essay on gender stereotypes! Let me clutch my pearls! beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #4
No, Bernie said wanted to "abolish all laws dealing with sexual behavior." SunSeeker Jan 2016 #5
Reading is fundamental: "Bernie Sanders Was for Full GAY Equality 40 Years Ago" beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #6
I quoted Sanders correctly. See paragraph 3 of his tome. SunSeeker Jan 2016 #9
You misquoted the article, you even put quotes around "marriage equality". beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #10
The position he was advocating is IDENTICAL to that which was codified in the Lawrence decision. Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #8
I do not believe we should abolish pedophilia or rape laws. SunSeeker Jan 2016 #11
Wtf? He doesn't think rape and pedophilia laws should be repealed. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #12
One wonders what is so damn important about this particular woman becoming POTUS, it justifies these Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #14
I wonder if they think sexual fantasies are more "creepy" than the death penalty? beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #15
It's not new. They were doing the same shit when this stuff was "unearthed" months ago. Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #16
Well said, you summed it up perfectly. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #17
He mentioned homosexuality and adultery. You are deliberately inferring other shit into it Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #13
While I agree generally that the long ago past BlueMTexpat Jan 2016 #18
I realize that Boomers, in particular, are endlessly fascinated with this stuff, but personally Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #7
Actually I'm most concerned with what they are doing right now Fumesucker Jan 2016 #19

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
1. To me it says the 60-somethings are about to get a rude awakening
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 04:39 AM
Jan 2016

when it becomes clear how few Americans really care about what someone did in the 1960s.

It was a half century ago, as far from today as the First World War was from then. One reason I like both Obama and O'Malley is the fact that somebody too young to do 1960s re-litigation at least has a chance to break the Boomers out of their navel-gazing.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
3. Bear in mind that at least one battle from the 60's is still being fought
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 05:09 AM
Jan 2016

I know people my age who hid from their parents, then hid from their kids and now are hiding from their grandkids..

Want to know what they are hiding? The fact that they like to smoke pot, it's still totally illegal on the Federal level. We can't overcome the ideological wars of the 60' s enough to make the safest recreational substance on the planet legal.

Obama is against legalizing cannabis and I suspect O'Malley would be the same, O'Malley has a yard wide authoritarian streak that he revealed in a disgusting way in Baltimore when he was mayor.

SunSeeker

(51,550 posts)
2. Let's compare what the two candidates were doing in 1972, shall we?
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 05:01 AM
Jan 2016

Hillary was out in the field registering poor Latino voters in the Rio Grande Valley of Texas back in 1972. 

Hillary Clinton, the presumptive favorite for the Democratic nomination, beat Obama 2–1 among Latino voters in the 2008 primary. It wasn’t just name recognition, either. The Clintons have a robust network of Latino leaders and activists, and long history with outreach that dates back to 1970s in Texas. 
. . . 
In 1972, when a young Hillary and Bill Clinton were working the ill-fated George McGovern campaign, she worked closely with well-respected union leader, Franklin Garcia, who took her under his wing as she helped register Latino voters in south Texas and along the Rio Grande Valley.

http://www.buzzfeed.com/adriancarrasquillo/hillary-clinton-has-deep-history-with-latinos-and-theres-not#.jdqM3ajE3

And what was Bernie, then in his 30s, doing in 1972? Writing this:




beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
4. ZOMG! An essay on gender stereotypes! Let me clutch my pearls!
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 05:12 AM
Jan 2016

How about we look at another letter Bernie wrote in the 70's when he was decades ahead of Hillary in the fight for civil rights for lgbt people and RUNNING FOR GOVERNOR instead of being married to one:

Bernie Sanders Was for Full Gay Equality 40 Years Ago

Today’s Supreme Court decision was a monumental moment in American history, as it guaranteed the right for gays and lesbians to get married and established full marriage equality.

Many politicians offered their words of support, including President Obama and Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton.

Yet it is important to remember that Obama and Clinton both opposed marriage equality as late as early 2012. It is a testament to the work of thousands of activists over decades that the political class was pulled towards supporting equality.

There is however one prominent politician who did not wait so long to call for full gay equality: Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT)

In a letter he published in the early 1970’s, when he was a candidate for governor of Vermont from the Liberty Union Party, Sanders invoked freedom to call for the abolition of all laws related to homosexuality:




http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/bernie-sanders-was-full-gay-equality-40-years-ago


SunSeeker

(51,550 posts)
5. No, Bernie said wanted to "abolish all laws dealing with sexual behavior."
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 05:20 AM
Jan 2016

That is NOT the same thing as calling for "full marriage equality." He didn't call for that until decades later.

But his call to abolish all laws dealing with sexual behavior is quite disturbing considering at the time he thought women fantasized about getting raped, as he describes in that Man and Woman piece.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
6. Reading is fundamental: "Bernie Sanders Was for Full GAY Equality 40 Years Ago"
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 05:32 AM
Jan 2016

First: no one claimed he was for "full marriage equality." in 1972, you deliberately misquoted the article.

And secondly: Bernie was correct - women do fantasize about being raped. Maybe you should do some homework instead of getting on your high horse and acting like fantasies are immoral. You have no right to pass judgement on what consenting adults think or do.

In fact you seem like just the kind of person Bernie had in mind when he talked about abolishing prudish laws restricting what adults can do in the bedroom.

So your attempt to rewrite the article and paint him as some kind of deviant is a straw man and completely irrelevant to what the author ACTUALLY wrote.

I'll post the letter for you again since you obviously didn't bother to read it the first time:

SunSeeker

(51,550 posts)
9. I quoted Sanders correctly. See paragraph 3 of his tome.
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 05:49 AM
Jan 2016

"Full gay equality" would have to include marriage equality, which you admit he did not call for at the time. So he clearly did not believe in "full gay equality."

And no, rape is rape. It is not something women secretly wish was happening to them. It is way too late in the night to be having this creepy conversation with you.

I'm signing off.





beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
10. You misquoted the article, you even put quotes around "marriage equality".
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 05:58 AM
Jan 2016
That is NOT the same thing as calling for "full marriage equality." He didn't call for that until decades later.


He WROTE full gay equality so he must have MEANT full gay equality, your opinion on what he thought is also irrelevant and doesn't change the facts.

The only thing creepy is your assertion that women's fantasies are "creepy".

Rape fantasies are extremely popular, get out of your bubble and check out the genre, women have been writing erotica for longer than you've been alive.

Fantasies are HEALTHY, looking down your nose at women who don't conform to your strict sense of morality is not.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
8. The position he was advocating is IDENTICAL to that which was codified in the Lawrence decision.
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 05:48 AM
Jan 2016
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_v._Texas

So if you want to join Scalia in complaining about it, by all means, make your case.

SunSeeker

(51,550 posts)
11. I do not believe we should abolish pedophilia or rape laws.
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 06:02 AM
Jan 2016

I don’t think "all laws dealing with sexual behavior" should be "abolished" like Bernie calls for in the 1970s letter. Rape and pedophilia laws should stay on the books. Unlike Scalia, I don’t think gay sex between two consenting adults is akin to rape or pedophilia.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
12. Wtf? He doesn't think rape and pedophilia laws should be repealed.
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 06:06 AM
Jan 2016

He was referring to consensual sex between adults.

He even SPECIFIED homosexuality and adultery in the letter.

Now you're making him out to be an advocate of rape - and even worse child rape - because he didn't think consenting adults should be jailed?


Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
14. One wonders what is so damn important about this particular woman becoming POTUS, it justifies these
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 06:14 AM
Jan 2016

sorts of base smears -raw, unmitigated ugliness- against a guy who has done nothing but fight for working people and disadvantaged populations for his entire life.

Frankly, it's as disturbing as any of the real issues I have with Hillary's track record on things like the IWR.

The fact that she- and her supporters- want this deal that badly;

....speaking of "creepy".

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
15. I wonder if they think sexual fantasies are more "creepy" than the death penalty?
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 06:21 AM
Jan 2016

Thought police scare the hell out of me, telling women that their fantasies are creepy is authoritarian.

And yes, it looks like her supporters will say and do just about anything to win.

They've tried to justify Hillary's support for the Iraq war, the death penalty, draconian drug laws and now they're claiming Bernie advocates rape and pedophilia.


Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
16. It's not new. They were doing the same shit when this stuff was "unearthed" months ago.
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 06:43 AM
Jan 2016

it takes some seriously willful disingenuousness to try and spin those sorts of nasty interpretations out of that material. The essay, for one, reads like nothing so much as a bad bit of Andrea Dworkin- the worst part about it is the kind of ham-fisted attempt at analysis of then-contemporary societal gender roles, but it was hardly out of place, or an unusual perspective, for the time; and lord knows we ALL were worse writers, when we were younger, at least I know I was.

But to try and spin it as some kind of "sex fantasy"; Penthouse Forum, if you will, and not what it so clearly is, namely an attempt at stark social commentary... fucking ludicrous.

As for the letter, one thing to remember is that back in those days we hadn't been subjected to several decades of "whatabouterry" from the would-be authoritarians. At least, back then they still thought they could win (and sometimes did) arguments against consenting adult behavior simply by stating their belief that the consenting adults shouldn't be allowed to behave that way.

Since then, though, as the culture has gradually become more tolerant to letting consenting adults make their own decisions insofar as they aren't harming anyone else, the authoritarians have shifted tactics, namely to respond to any argument for choice or personal freedom (again, for consenting adults) with a litany of "butbutbut"s, straw men, slippery slopes, and the inevitable "whatabout"; what about children, what about non-consent, etc.

(Sen. Cornyn: Gay marriage means people fucking box turtles. Please, think of the box turtles.)

"sex scenes on cable tv? Pictures of naked breasts on the internet? butbutbut! Whatabout? whatabout?" It is, of course, so effin' pervasive that any rational person who now decides to make a cogent argument around freedom for consenting adult behavior knows to damn sure qualify it every five seconds with "consenting adult". But it's so ubiquitous that now when we read this letter from Sanders, back in '72 or whenever, it is taken- again, with no small measure of disingenuousness, to be sure- to somehow mean all this shit it obviously doesn't, simply because he didn't do this endless qualifying thing that everyone understands they have to do, now.

It would have been patently obvious to anyone reading that, at the time, what he was- and wasn't- saying. What he was saying was radical, certainly- and for saying it back then it ought to be held up as the profile in courage, ahead of its time, that it clearly is.


Instead, you see how it is twisted into the most ugliest of implications. Shameful.




beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
17. Well said, you summed it up perfectly.
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 06:54 AM
Jan 2016

I don't know a single intelligent adult woman who thinks that essay is creepy. Of course context is everything.

The poutrage over it is transparent to anyone who's been paying attention.

They're been mischaracterizing that letter for months, even going so far as claiming Bernie fantasizes about rape and "thinks women enjoy being raped". That last accusation was hidden and rightfully so but Hillary's supporters continue the crusade.

They support a candidate who thinks killing incarcerated human beings is moral but they themselves believe certain sexual fantasies aren't?

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
13. He mentioned homosexuality and adultery. You are deliberately inferring other shit into it
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 06:10 AM
Jan 2016

That clearly isnt there.

It's pretty fucking obvious from the context of this (ancient) letter that the subject he was referrning to was consenting adult behavior. He mentioned drugs and abortion, too. Do you think that meant he was advocating forced abortions? Shooting random people up with heroin against their will? Obviously fucking not.

It was an oversimplistic (common to the rhetoric of the era) but pretty straightforward assertion of the principle of personal freedom for consenting adults.

Oh, and yes, I do realize that principle still pisses some people off to no end, even to this day. People like Scalia.

BlueMTexpat

(15,366 posts)
18. While I agree generally that the long ago past
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 07:41 AM
Jan 2016

matters less than the present, this 1972 contrast is indeed striking.



Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
7. I realize that Boomers, in particular, are endlessly fascinated with this stuff, but personally
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 05:46 AM
Jan 2016

I'm far more concerned with what the candidates were doing in the '00s.





http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/07/opinion/senator-clinton-in-pander-mode.html

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
19. Actually I'm most concerned with what they are doing right now
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 07:49 AM
Jan 2016

And one of them is lying their ass off and dispatching minions to do the same but worse.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Clinton and Sanders: The ...