Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Debate may/may not happen, (Original Post) elleng Jan 2016 OP
He literally called for more debates and now pulls this. hrmjustin Jan 2016 #1
It's between sanctioned/unsanctioned. elleng Jan 2016 #2
He is making a big error. The DNC can't sanction all of them if they all go. hrmjustin Jan 2016 #3
I agree, elleng Jan 2016 #5
Hillary won't go if unsanctioned. Voice for Peace Jan 2016 #38
Of course the DNC could sanction all of them. winter is coming Jan 2016 #17
And then they could do more debates. The DNC is not going to cancel the future debates. hrmjustin Jan 2016 #20
You don't know that. n/t winter is coming Jan 2016 #23
Clinton won't do the debate if it is unsanctioned. This is why her spokesperson today PoliticAverse Jan 2016 #29
I pointed this out on the linked thread of the OP. Uncle Joe Jan 2016 #36
It's the 2 sanctioned debates on Feb 11 and March 9 Cheese Sandwich Jan 2016 #8
So dws might cancel them, elleng Jan 2016 #10
It just seemed like you thought the only remaining debates were in the general election. Cheese Sandwich Jan 2016 #14
You're right, I did, elleng Jan 2016 #15
The March one is pretty forgettable, since like 20 states would have voted by then jfern Jan 2016 #41
"literally?" Ok, thanks. pangaia Jan 2016 #27
Well he did call for more debates. hrmjustin Jan 2016 #31
A single debate in Q2 or Q3 when not many people knew of Bernie yet would have been nice jfern Jan 2016 #40
Sanders fears HRC. nt LexVegas Jan 2016 #4
I don't think so, elleng Jan 2016 #7
of course she blames bernie and his campagin Robbins Jan 2016 #6
Sanders said he would not. hrmjustin Jan 2016 #13
Not good for Bernie. Andy823 Jan 2016 #9
I agree, but what really happened, Andy? elleng Jan 2016 #11
Yes Andy823 Jan 2016 #24
Yes he has done better. elleng Jan 2016 #26
Hillary and O'Malley should debate without Bernie, as an outsider Bernie should abide by Deb's rules Autumn Jan 2016 #12
LOL, she'd be debating with herself and she'd still lose. CharlotteVale Jan 2016 #21
This is hilarious. Autumn Jan 2016 #22
Why should he do it when if he does he won't be able to participate in the "official" debates? CharlotteVale Jan 2016 #16
If all three participate do you think the final two sanctioned debates will be canceled? tammywammy Jan 2016 #28
Yes. winter is coming Jan 2016 #33
The real question is why doesn't DWS sanction this debate? CharlotteVale Jan 2016 #34
pure politics bigtree Jan 2016 #18
NOT the first time, ya know, bigtree! elleng Jan 2016 #19
I agree. Andy823 Jan 2016 #25
That's my thought tammywammy Jan 2016 #30
I agree. Andy823 Jan 2016 #42
This message was self-deleted by its author Voice for Peace Jan 2016 #39
DWS aka Camp Hillary suddenly want to debate because they are down NowSam Jan 2016 #32
Well, this is easy, aspirant Jan 2016 #35
what utter bullshit game playing by dws restorefreedom Jan 2016 #37

elleng

(130,646 posts)
2. It's between sanctioned/unsanctioned.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:42 PM
Jan 2016

As happened earlier (discussions between O'Malley + Sanders campaigns,) he appeared to be but then

He's afraid of being prohibited from participating in future debates, whenever they might be. During the GENERAL campaign???

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
3. He is making a big error. The DNC can't sanction all of them if they all go.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:44 PM
Jan 2016

He should drop his opposition and debate.

elleng

(130,646 posts)
5. I agree,
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:48 PM
Jan 2016

'sanction' means nothing if they all go, and surely DNC wouldn't prevent any of them from appearing agains repugs in the General.

 

Voice for Peace

(13,141 posts)
38. Hillary won't go if unsanctioned.
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 02:17 AM
Jan 2016

DWS says no sanction.
(Who the fuck is she anyway)
Bernie abides by his agreement
I personally wish he and Martin would tell the DNC to go fuck itself, set up REAL & FAIR dtebates, invite Hilary, trump, carly

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
29. Clinton won't do the debate if it is unsanctioned. This is why her spokesperson today
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 12:08 AM
Jan 2016

mentioned the sanction requirement.

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
8. It's the 2 sanctioned debates on Feb 11 and March 9
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:52 PM
Jan 2016

Debating on Feb 4 could get you banned from those two as per the rules.

jfern

(5,204 posts)
40. A single debate in Q2 or Q3 when not many people knew of Bernie yet would have been nice
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 02:26 AM
Jan 2016

But now that Hillary isn't doing so well there's suddenly another debate? Screw that.

Robbins

(5,066 posts)
6. of course she blames bernie and his campagin
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:49 PM
Jan 2016

she can't be any clearer she is biased towards CLinton.

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
9. Not good for Bernie.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:54 PM
Jan 2016

After all the complaining about more debates, and now he will sit it out! I think Hillary said she would go if Bernie went, and O'Malley was the first to say yes. I can pretty much guess how his so called supporters will spin this here on DU even when they all wanted "more debates" for months now.

elleng

(130,646 posts)
11. I agree, but what really happened, Andy?
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:56 PM
Jan 2016

MO'M said YES immediately, hrc said OK if other participate. Think she was betting bernie wouldn't agree, thus avoiding need to show up, screwing MO'M again???

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
24. Yes
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 11:56 PM
Jan 2016

i think both of them don't want to debate O'Malley anymore than they have to. He has been doing much better in the debates, and the more that can avoid him, the better. I am really disappointed though that Bernie is the one that backed down after all the times he complained we needed more debates.

No way in hell would the DNC do anything if all of them showed up and debated. Even if that happened, they could still have all the debates they could get sponsored by other groups, and the media would be there.

elleng

(130,646 posts)
26. Yes he has done better.
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 12:01 AM
Jan 2016

I'd thought from the beginning that hrc/dnc/dws didn't want to confront MO'M, too many FACTS and responsible PLANS to deal with.

Autumn

(44,958 posts)
12. Hillary and O'Malley should debate without Bernie, as an outsider Bernie should abide by Deb's rules
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:57 PM
Jan 2016

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
28. If all three participate do you think the final two sanctioned debates will be canceled?
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 12:06 AM
Jan 2016

If the other two are canceled, then the other candidates would be free to set up their own anyway.

winter is coming

(11,785 posts)
33. Yes.
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 12:20 AM
Jan 2016

If the goal is to minimize the amount of time HRC and Sanders are on the same stage, yes. One debate, before NH, a state Bernie's widely expected to win, is better than two later on. There would be no chance of Hillary having a 9/11 moment just before Super Tuesday, and HRC could focus her attention on carefully managed press opportunities and ad campaigns.

CharlotteVale

(2,717 posts)
34. The real question is why doesn't DWS sanction this debate?
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 12:36 AM
Jan 2016

Bernie previously agreed to not participate in unsanctioned debates. Whether the DNC would cancel the official ones is utterly beside the point.

Bernie won't go back on his agreement to not participate in an unsanctioned debate. The DNC would like nothing better than to make him the bad guy if he did. And he's being made the bad guy anyway because he is keeping to his word.

If this debate were sanctioned, of course he would take part. So once again, why won't DWS sanction it if they all want to do it?

elleng

(130,646 posts)
19. NOT the first time, ya know, bigtree!
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 11:02 PM
Jan 2016

Isn't this cute, same crap happening with trump + repug 'debate' this week, doesn't like megan kelly!!!

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
25. I agree.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 11:59 PM
Jan 2016

This is going to make "him" look bad. Could be bad advice from his camp, or he is making the mistake, but if they all showed up, there is no way the DNC would do anything, and even if they did, the three of them could have as many debates as the want with other groups sponsoring them. This is not good for Bernie at all.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
30. That's my thought
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 12:08 AM
Jan 2016

Say the DNC then cancels the other two debates, okay then they could set up their own with another sponsor.

Seems like this would be a no brainer for Bernie.

Response to Andy823 (Reply #25)

NowSam

(1,252 posts)
32. DWS aka Camp Hillary suddenly want to debate because they are down
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 12:16 AM
Jan 2016

But they made the rules and now Bernie who is winning is abiding by those rules. Seems like DWS/Camp Hill should just make this an official debate and then all candidates could participate. Suddenly its okay to break the rules because Hillary is down? Transparent.

aspirant

(3,533 posts)
35. Well, this is easy,
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 12:41 AM
Jan 2016

both Maddow and Todd have shows on MSNBC so just bring DWS on and find out if she is sanctioning their debate and if not, why not?

Case closed

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
37. what utter bullshit game playing by dws
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 12:56 AM
Jan 2016

there is a simple solution to this

dnc contacts the three campaigns and ask them if they agree to have the exclusivity clause lifted
dnc either sanctions this debate or removes the exclusivity clause and penalty
candidates are free to debate

when hillary was afraid to debate, they were,locked away like they were a televised crime. now she is tanking, and her campaign is goading both other campaigns into participating in an unsanctioned debate.

i am glad bernie is not getting into this game playing. unfortunately, dws screwed herself. if she sanctions this debate, it will look like favoratism towards the clinton campaign, which of course it is. if she doesn't weigh in, she will force all three candidates to flout the rules,which could result in penalties. and i don't think for a minute she would hesitate to try and punish some candidates more than another.

i feel bad for the mom campaign, as he has been screwed the most by this biased rigging. but mom supporters please remember whose fault this really is, and it isn't bernie who is trying to follow the rules, and followed them even when they disadvantaged him.

this is what happens when people try and rig shit and it blows up in their face.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Debate may/may not happen...