Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
At some point in the game you just have to go by your gut (Original Post) BigBearJohn Jan 2016 OP
My gut tells me Clinton. BTW, what's wrong with hyperbolas? DanTex Jan 2016 #1
may rhe best candidate win BigBearJohn Jan 2016 #3
At least it was posted in the conic section of DU Renew Deal Jan 2016 #7
HA! JonLeibowitz Jan 2016 #10
Come now, don't make an asymptote of yourself. aidbo Jan 2016 #20
Nothing wrong with reviewing a fact or two Hortensis Jan 2016 #2
Each of those bullet points requires an act of Congress. jeff47 Jan 2016 #12
I guess much the way Bernie would do it, right? Hortensis Jan 2016 #13
When you want to argue someone is bad for being unrealistic jeff47 Jan 2016 #14
Is your argument that all Obama's achievements Hortensis Jan 2016 #16
Nope. But that was a lovely strawman you just destroyed. jeff47 Jan 2016 #19
My gut says Clinton liberal N proud Jan 2016 #4
like I said... go with your gut. BigBearJohn Jan 2016 #6
Your post is rhombus! Renew Deal Jan 2016 #5
cute ..2/3rds of a pun: P U BigBearJohn Jan 2016 #8
Agreed. tecelote Jan 2016 #9
My gut also says we are part of historic events. Hortensis Jan 2016 #15
The problem is that we're not going in the right direction. tecelote Jan 2016 #17
New Deal, Fair Deal, Great Society, Hortensis Jan 2016 #18
My gut and a looooooong list of issues are making me support Sanders Doctor_J Jan 2016 #11

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
2. Nothing wrong with reviewing a fact or two
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 08:46 AM
Jan 2016

also, though, right? Since there is such anxiety in general over healthcare, here are a few of the details from just Hillary's "Plan for Lowering Prescription Drug Costs."

* Allow Medicare to negotiate drug and biologic prices.
* Allow Americans to import drugs from abroad.
* Demand a stop to excessive profiteering and marketing by denying tax breaks for direct-to-consumer advertising.
* Demand that drug companies invest in R&D in exchange for taxpayer support..
* Encourage competition to get more generics on the market.
* Create a Federal backstop for when there are excessively high-priced drugs that face no competition.
* Cap what insurers can charge consumers in out-of-pocket costs ... Clinton’s plan will require health insurance plans to place a monthly limit of $250 on covered out-of-pocket prescription drug costs...
* Fully fund the FDA’s Office of Generic Drugs to clear out their multi-year generic drug approval backlog, which has kept competitors off the market, ...

A lot more details are spelled out at: https://www.hillaryclinton.com/briefing/factsheets/2015/09/21/hillary-clinton-plan-for-lowering-prescription-drug-costs/

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
12. Each of those bullet points requires an act of Congress.
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 11:33 AM
Jan 2016

Please explain how she gets the same people that scheduled more than 60 votes to repeal the ACA to pass any of those.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
13. I guess much the way Bernie would do it, right?
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 11:47 AM
Jan 2016

IF he were so unambitious as to "settle" for an agenda that already has the support of a majority of the electorate, of course.

Like THIS plan that people already know they WANT. That support is what will make further advances possible.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
14. When you want to argue someone is bad for being unrealistic
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 12:07 PM
Jan 2016

you can't turn around and be just as unrealistic. At least, if you want your claims to be remotely believable.

So how does Clinton get any of these bullet points passed by the same people who voted to repeal the ACA more than 60 times?

Like THIS plan that people already know they WANT.

The majority wants single-payer. Even around 40% of Republicans want it. Or do scientific polls not count now?

That support is what will make further advances possible.

You mean, exactly what Sanders plans to do? So odd to claim this is impossible to do when it's his plan, but the clouds will part, the angels will sing and Republicans will vote for Clinton's proposals.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
16. Is your argument that all Obama's achievements
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 01:13 PM
Jan 2016

never happened? He faced a Congress that had determined on a scorched-earth policy. We may well retake the Senate this election and at least a good number of house seats.

Hillary is a healthcare reform pro and she has a long list of advancements on the ACA that she intends to implement, not just the ones above. No pie in the sky promises Bernie-style, but real achievable goals Obama-style.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
19. Nope. But that was a lovely strawman you just destroyed.
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 02:40 PM
Jan 2016
He faced a Congress that had determined on a scorched-earth policy.

Psssst.....2009 and 2010 still exist. Who had majorities in Congress those two years?

Hillary is a healthcare reform pro

Based on....failing at it in the 1990s?

she has a long list of advancements on the ACA that she intends to implement, not just the ones above. No pie in the sky promises Bernie-style

Every single one of those enhancements require Congress.

The basis for calling Sanders's plan "pie in the sky" is that it can't pass Congress.

How does Clinton get any of those advancements through Congress? She can't. Republicans hate her, hate the ACA, and would rather people suffer and die than strengthen the ACA.

Which means her plan is just as "pie in the sky" as Sanders.

tecelote

(5,122 posts)
9. Agreed.
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 09:17 AM
Jan 2016

For once, Americans are not buying what the media is selling. We're about to take a hard left turn as a nation and, although we all know it will take time, left is the right direction to go before we destroy our world.

It's that important. Status quo will just take us where we're heading. Disaster.

We need a revolution to save the world for our children.

It took until 1800 to hit one billion people. 150 years later, we were at 3 billion. Today we are at around 6 and by the time our children are in their fifties, there will be 9 or 10 billion. We need to get our priorities straight now.

If we don't start working harder for Peace, Healthcare, Education and Human Rights, the terrorists win because all we have now is Trump and Terrorists on the news. That's a sure sign of a society in decline.

Bernie is our best hope and the only moral and ethical option.

Every American should be voting for Bernie. It's in their own self-interest. That's why this "surge" of Bernie's is not going to flat line. The more people hear him talk, the more he surges.

My gut tells me we are witnessing an historic event. Just in the nick of time.



Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
15. My gut also says we are part of historic events.
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 01:05 PM
Jan 2016

I just prefer to build on and move forward from what we have or once had and know works. I am not interested in experimenting with the wellbeing of a nation.

That is what a lot of Reaganomics was - conservative experimentation, wanting to believe it would work because their ideology insisted it would. In the end they decided that giant sucking sound constituted all the success they needed.

tecelote

(5,122 posts)
17. The problem is that we're not going in the right direction.
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 01:37 PM
Jan 2016

Let's look at the New Deal and not Reagan.

Hillary will continue with what is creating the problem because she is part of it. Bernie is not be worried about Wall Street, Monsanto and Exxon in the same way. They can still profit but not at our expense.

We need to move left and fast. Our planet is not worried at all about profits or us.

It's dire that we get a grip and start acting morally responsible.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
18. New Deal, Fair Deal, Great Society,
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 02:08 PM
Jan 2016

and so on. We learned so much from those years. The New Deal would literally not be doable in this environment, but then we're not starting from scratch as they had to either. Nothing "new" about restoring guaranteed vacation leave, for instance. Just a return to that and many other things we once had and want back, plus finally moving forward once again on many fronts to achieve what we should have long ago.

Notably, we are no longer among the leaders in socioeconomic progress. We now have the benefit of the experiences of what worked and didn't in other nations.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»At some point in the game...