2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWow. 300 whole people showed up to Clinton's "rally" in Iowa.
I think more cows showed up at the farm next door to be deliberately shot in the head.
MineralMan
(146,286 posts)Likening Clinton supporters to cows going to slaughter.
I'd alert, but it would be left.
Ugly shit is what this is.
Edit: Changed analogy to comparison.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)Autumn
(45,051 posts)aikoaiko
(34,169 posts)MineralMan
(146,286 posts)Changed analogy to comparison. But:
əˈnaləjē/Submit
noun
a comparison between two things, typically on the basis of their structure and for the purpose of explanation or clarification.
"an analogy between the workings of nature and those of human societies"
a correspondence or partial similarity.
"the syndrome is called deep dysgraphia because of its analogy to deep dyslexia"
a thing that is comparable to something else in significant respects.
"works of art were seen as an analogy for works of nature"
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)I hope you don't play poker. Everyone at the table knows you have a weak hand.
MineralMan
(146,286 posts)Then, in a low stakes draw poker game at a USAF base in Turkey, I was holding a 10 high straight flush. I maxed out the betting, of course. When the only other player still in the hand called, I laid out my hand. The other player laid down a queen high straight flush.
I have not played poker since. If a guy can't go for broke with a straight flush, he has no luck at all.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)"If a guy can't go for broke with a straight flush, he has no luck at all."
Hillary went into this Primary with a straight flush. It remains to be seen if she will take the pot.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)There was no comparing Clinton supporters to cows.
He was comparing the NUMBERS. Fewer supporters seeing Clinton--that were at the farm next door.
Big, big giant mountains out of tiny little molehills.
HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)The ability of some Clinton supporters to twist words is unbelievable. Where did you learn it?
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)eom
angel123
(79 posts)This discussion illustrates why it is so hard for me to support Sanders, his supporters are nasty people. This is not like democrats. You like to compare yourselves to Obama's 2008 campaign. Sorry, you are not like his campaign at all.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)I suspect, however, that you likely weren't thinking of supporting Bernie. Not with that attitude and post. And I still don't get people who choose candidates based on liking or disliking internet threads. Are you saying that if all of Bernie's supporters were "nice" you'd choose him to vote for?
HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)I realize that most are just normal people, but there's a select few on this board that go out of their way to distort reality. I'm sorry if you took offense.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)Considering the image you have spent so much time trying to cultivate here of being sophisticated and rational I find it utterly strange that you would seem to make such a bizarre and ridiculous error.
A junior high school student could identify that that comparison is purely numeric.
floriduck
(2,262 posts)Chick f la commercial.
#Eatmorchickn
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)....you give me a headache.
How's that for an analogy?
frylock
(34,825 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)The OP did not liken Hillary supporters to cows. The OP is a comment on Hillary's ability to attract people to her events. It says nothing about her supporters.
But, of course, being a professional writer, you had to have known that before you twisted the OP's words.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)they had all ready attended the Clinton rally earlier in the day at the bowling alley.
thereismore
(13,326 posts)onecaliberal
(32,818 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)I thought.. Is this 'coffeecat?"
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)Last edited Wed Jan 27, 2016, 07:24 PM - Edit history (1)
I think the last leg of the Iowa caucuses is getting to me.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)redwitch
(14,944 posts)Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)Bernie & Elizabeth 2016!!!
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)I mean, she's the prohibitive favorite, right? How much enthusiasm can that generate? Everyone has heard all she has to say,and they know she's just going to keep repeating it, and it's not very inspirational, so why go see her in person? Most Democrats have resigned themselves to voting for her, as our party has instructed us to do. After 35 years of more of the same, there's not much to rally about. We just troop to the polls as directed, vote as directed, and adjust our expectations as directed. This time is no different than any other time. Considering all that, 300 people is a pretty good turnout.
Response to HassleCat (Reply #5)
Motown_Johnny This message was self-deleted by its author.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)When the polls had Clinton ahead, the polls were all correct. Now the polls that show Sanders in the lead are wrong, and those that show Clinton ahead are still correct. Now that more and more of the "likely voter" polls show Sanders moving up, we have to look at "registered voter" polls, which still show Clinton ahead. It's an evolving situation, and we have to evolve our thinking to conform to what our party requires of us. Resistance is useless. You will be assimilated.
Response to HassleCat (Reply #15)
Motown_Johnny This message was self-deleted by its author.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)But it really did look like other posts I have seen that were meant to be serious.
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)brooklynite
(94,500 posts)I know it's exciting to post big rally photos, but remember that rally crowds don't translate to votes:
and that rally crowds are a miniscule percentage of actual voters.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)I was being sarcastic when I posted, but the problem with sarcasm is it often resembles reality.
Jarqui
(10,123 posts)they can sit at home, burp their beer down and rest up for voting day ...
brooklynite
(94,500 posts)...or have those town halls I keep hearing about Sanders attending been an equal disappointment?
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)ever.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Even you don't believe this shit anymore.
artislife
(9,497 posts)just to make sure not too many people showed up so it could remain "intimate".
I can hear them now. "No Mabel, you have to sit this one out, Fred and Estelle and that nice girl from down the street are going. We must not be too many, how else can Hillary listen to us?"
Wow, if they did that, then her support is so much smaller than previously thought.
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)You might give some perspective for those who are not sitting waiting for the next attack opportunity
Indepatriot
(1,253 posts)VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)Maybe 290.
in_cog_ni_to
(41,600 posts)PEACE
LOVE
BERNIE
frylock
(34,825 posts)Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)That would explain the numbers. Can't be that many Billionaires in Iowa
INdemo
(6,994 posts)funding from her Wall St and Banker friends go to Hillary's"the Clinton Foundation"?
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)...Nate the silverware guy says she has a 167% chance of winning.....
Atman
(31,464 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)beaglelover
(3,466 posts)MineralMan
(146,286 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Wilms
(26,795 posts)orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)rurallib
(62,406 posts)quickesst
(6,280 posts)I'm glad they were whole people, and not just parts of people.
Atman
(31,464 posts)"All of three hundred people...."
"A mere three hundred people..."
"You are a douche bag..."
I'll pay more attention to my grammar in future posts.
quickesst
(6,280 posts)"You are a douche bag..." is acceptable on Bernie underground. At work now, but don't worry, I'll get back to you.
snarky stuff all through this thread. Snark back and 'douche bag' gets pulled out.
quickesst
(6,280 posts)I really didn't mean to make him/her? cry.
merrily
(45,251 posts).
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
No comments added by alerter
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Jan 27, 2016, 09:07 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Grammar whiner but not worth a hide.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Atman said this? What a, um, surprise.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
quickesst
(6,280 posts)Here is the long and the short of it. It was a joke, not meant to offend or upset. I actually thought you might even get a little kick out of it. Lord knows, I've made my fair share grammar mistakes, and have been corrected, sometimes with humor, and sometimes not. If you had made the douchebag statement about anyone else, I probably would have alerted on you. I have pretty thick skin, but I think most here would agree that the term is offensive. I'll just leave it at that.
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)for the time being
Autumn
(45,051 posts)just for the farm next door sentence .