2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary Helps Swiss Bank Avoid IRS—and Then It Funnels Millions to the Clintons
snip
How can mainstream Democratic Party beliefs about the corrupting effects of money in politics and the perniciousness of Big Finance possibly be squared with elevating as their leaders a couple as cozy with Big Finance as anyone in American politics?
snip
Even Democrats who arent concerned about the agenda of Big Finance ought to ask themselves if America is best served by a president and first spouse who care so little about preserving the confidence that the public can reasonably have in the integrity of their actions. They are far from the only members of our elite whove put a payday ahead of the common good, but its hard to think of a more flagrant example.
Background information
snip
A few weeks after Hillary Clinton was sworn in as secretary of state in early 2009, she was summoned to Geneva by her Swiss counterpart to discuss an urgent matter. The Internal Revenue Service was suing UBS AG to get the identities of Americans with secret accounts, the newspaper reports. If the case proceeded, Switzerlands largest bank would face an impossible choice: Violate Swiss secrecy laws by handing over the names, or refuse and face criminal charges in U.S. federal court. Within months, Mrs. Clinton announced a tentative legal settlementan unusual intervention by the top U.S. diplomat. UBS ultimately turned over information on 4,450 accounts, a fraction of the 52,000 sought by the IRS.
snip
Then reporters James V. Grimaldi and Rebecca Ballhaus lay out how UBS helped the Clintons. Total donations by UBS to the Clinton Foundation grew from less than $60,000 through 2008 to a cumulative total of about $600,000 by the end of 2014,...And it paid former president Bill Clinton $1.5 million to participate in a series of question-and-answer sessions with UBS Wealth Management Chief Executive Bob McCann, making UBS his biggest single corporate source of speech income disclosed since he left the White House.
snip
...Maybe its all a mere coincidence, and when UBS agreed to pay Bill Clinton $1.5 million the relevant decision-maker wasnt even aware of the vast sum his wife may have saved the bank or the power that she will potentially wield after the 2016 presidential election.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/07/hillary-helps-a-bankand-then-it-pays-bill-15-million-in-speaking-fees/400067/
Hell Hath No Fury
(16,327 posts)all they want, but this -- THIS -- is really the big story that should have taken her down.
floriduck
(2,262 posts)Another inconvenient truth. (Sorry Al)
Go Iowa, get to the caucuses for Bernie.
valerief
(53,235 posts)kristopher
(29,798 posts)snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)she stumbles on the question of why she accepted the $675,000 windfall from GoldmanSachs.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)That's how come she is so rich.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)I know it's not.
Oh, she'll have some supporters come on here and feed us a line of shit but they are mere peddlers of the worst snake oil ever.
TheFarS1de
(1,017 posts)makes it easy to buy sychophants .
forest444
(5,902 posts)We'll do the rest.
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)... that the Clintons' wealth is the result of criminal behaviour on either of their parts, please post it here.
paleotn
(17,911 posts)..unethical. The two are not necessarily the same....but in the eyes of those of those of us with integrity, both are equally bad. I wonder who all those names are that UBS didn't have to divulge?
Volaris
(10,270 posts)There's nothing criminal or currently illegal about any of it
That's what needs to change.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)edge of legality as possible, too lawyered up to ever stray into illegality. Just because something is legal, doesn't make it right.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)to "earn" that amount. It's a huge slap in the face to the honest, hard working Americans struggling day to day. Not that you care. Some idolize the Wealthy and don't care how they got the wealth, but I hope they are not calling themselves Democrats.
The Wealth gap is growing and the Clintons are doing their part. It's called GRAFT.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)what it's like to be part of the 1%.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)compared to today. Especially the POC who had significantly fewer opportunities back in the 40s and 50s.
I had one grandmother who was a Real Sooner...participated in the Oklahoma Land Rush. That's a hard story. My Dad was her youngest of 12...8 lived. I believe she was born in the 1870s and was a young girl.
Unknown Beatle
(2,672 posts)she's lying through her teeth. Do you really think all those favors that did to big banks and Wall St. weren't repaid while they were still in the WH? The Clintons know how to cook the books. Their money is probably parked somewhere in an offshore tax haven.
840high
(17,196 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)And if somehow H wins, we will all be vomiting.
I still can't believe so many here still support H.
politicaljunkie41910
(3,335 posts)"...Within months, Mrs. Clinton announced a tentative legal settlementan unusual intervention by the top U.S. diplomat. UBS ultimately turned over information on 4,450 accounts, a fraction of the 52,000 sought by the IRS.
Hmmm. Why did the settlement not include all 52,000? Are we to imply that the 4,450 whose information got turned over to the IRS were people who did not pay off the Clintons through speaking fees????? Or perhaps the remainder of people were cleared for some other reason that the author thought we didn't need to know. Is this what passes for journalism these days.
I guess we don't know, because the Atlantic doesn't know the whole story or perhaps they would have told us why. Looks like the Atlantic only tells the part of the story that smears the Clintons and creates enough doubt for people here to find them guilty without having all the facts. How American.
green917
(442 posts)In contributions and speaking fees in a few short years doesn't strike you as a potential quid pro quo? come on now...let's be realistic. That settlement never would have happened without the direct intervention of secretary clinton and, yes, the other names that weren't divulged may not have had anything to do with that but that doesn't change the fact that, in negotiating the settlement, secretary clinton saved UBS billions and, shortly thereafter, their contributions to her increased by a factor of 100. If that doesn't smell like a quid pro quo to you, i don't know what you're thinking.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)but the Republicans will nail her to the wall. She thinks she can get away with all this shit because she has so far...there is an end to this insanity.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)... some HRC haters.
Noise, like the email non scandals and Bhengazi and white water and.....
to be ignored too.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)did Bill accept or reject a whopping $1.5 million? What's to spin?
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)... lying guessing or doing both.
They blew it on white water, after that its been noise and folk pay no attention to them..
Republicans believe HRC is teH Satan and their front runner is Donald Trump...
We don't care what republicans think
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)[h2][font color=red]
NOT!
[/h2][/font color=red]
Goddess help the generations to come, when this type of specious reasoning is now exhibited ad nauseum by supposed Democrats.
paleotn
(17,911 posts)...would you expect anything less? Not saying all Clinton supporters are unethical. Of course not. But if one is unethical and also socially liberal, who better than HRC to support?
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)... looks like some live in glass houses no?
paleotn
(17,911 posts)....That's like me stating Hill is singly responsible for the Iraq war. Culpable along with a lot of other amoral scum for the unnecessary deaths of tens of thousands, certainly, but not singly responsible. So Bernie did not single handedly grant immunity to anyone. It wasn't a good vote, but he still gets a career grade of D- from the NRA.
Hill, on the other hand, has been all about quid pro quo since Travelgate. You do remember Travelgate, don't you? Hill was all over the UBS deal as well, saving a foreign bank billions of dollars and protecting who knows who from paying their fair share of taxes. Face it, she takes care of those who enrich her personally. You want amoral grifters back in the White House? Coming on the heals of the cleanest Administration since Carter? Please.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)... and make her more culpable than her vote was worth.
Either way, Sanders can NOT throw stones... he has his own bag of bad that's more cutting to some than Hilllary's Iraq vote
tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)I don't want a president or even a dog catcher that lives in a self created cloud of questionable activities. Folks pay plenty of attention due to the regularity of unethical and privileged activities by the 1% and especially the Clintons.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)... Monica or what Clinton put in her coffee this morning
Not Sure
(735 posts)You really seem to love that word.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)Not Sure
(735 posts)uponit7771
(90,335 posts)... its full of asterisks, just like these hit pieces on HRC
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Benghazi, of course it is garbage.
White Water.. garbage.
The banking/ corporate connections....THIS is a different story.
Very different kettle of fish.
This is about power, money and greed.
NJCher
(35,658 posts)Did you even go to the link? See the sources? They happen to be the Wall St. Journal and The Atlantic Magazine...
Cher
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)The hell with the measly 1%, by my figures (> 90 million) they are in the .1%. Plez check my math.
http://www.joshuakennon.com/how-much-money-does-it-take-to-be-in-the-top-1-of-wealth-and-net-worth-in-the-united-states/
JoeyT
(6,785 posts)dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)Come on people, we have to support better candidates than this!
840high
(17,196 posts)HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)it's actually just highly placed friends helping highly placed friends with common interests
interactions between and among the power elite are unavoidable they run the world.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)and who can forget Hillary and Bill ecstatically greeting Trump at Trump's party.
Uncle Joe
(58,349 posts)Thanks for the thread, snagglepuss.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)then the United States deserves every bit of its current reputation, and deserves the repercussions of putting a sellout in position to take the White House.
EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)Is currently committing massive war crimes in Yemen. Including bombing children's hospitals and literally starving millions of women and children.
And...
They're doing this to help Saudi Arabia.
Guess which lobbying firm the Saudis hired to represent them in DC and keep this story out of the media... The one owned by Clinton's campaign chairman.
Huh.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)Saudi Arabia. We didn't get in bed with our enemies in Iran. We've been in bed with our enemies for much longer than just the nuclear negotiations, that's for goddamn sure.
EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)And guess who's benefiting the most from our war crimes in Yemen.
ISIS and al Qaeda. Literally.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)we have been in bed with our enemies for the past 15 years.
EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)We've been doing a lot worse since the 1950s. Endless assassinations. Death squads... You name it.
We also created and funded and trained and ran the Iranian secret police, which killed thousands of civilians. And helped Iraq kill tens of thousands of Iranian civilians in the Iran Iraq war.
Etc etc etc.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)Everything done in the name of hubris and "American Exceptionalism". Pah. Some days, it feels like I have to apologize for being born American.
EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)But it can also get you killed.
Americans are so wildly clueless... But the rest of the world knows this stuff.
It's amazing, when you consider the US and UK ran two Iranian coups, robbed millions from the Iranians in oil revenue, created their secret police, killed untold civilians in war and with the secret police... And of course we deliberately shot down an Iranian passenger plane full of women and children... Which we still refuse to apologize for... Anyway. It's amazing they haven't tried to do more to us. We also crippled their economy for years with sanctions and made them into international pariahs.
And that's just one country...
What we did in Guatemala and Chile and Greece and South East Asia and and and...
Of course we also secretly sterilized poor and minority women for years and let the military run grotesque medical testing ON US SOIL.
Amazing how few people know that. That's the crap media for ya.
bread_and_roses
(6,335 posts)Which is not surprising since the Dems have been as complicit as the Rs. It is a horror story. Endless death and suffering to protect "OUR" (mostly meaning our 1%) interests.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)what can we possibly do to fix all the shit we've done since the fifties that won't invite strikes on us when we pull out?
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)Yes, I know it's just a dream. Bernie won't act like Warren, and there's really no guarantee Warren would use that in a campaign.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)No...More...Clintons.
EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)Clintons Campaign Chairman owns a lobbying form which represents:
General Electric
Boeing
Bank of America
Merck
Corning bigwigs bundled hundreds of thousands for the Clinton campaign.
Honeywell is part of the Clinton Climate Initiative and donated to the Clinton Foundation.
Alfred Mottur, whose a major Clinton bundler and a drug industry lobbyist, works for the firm Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, who are major FedEx lobbyists.
Pfizer gave over a million at least to the Clinton Foundation.
Citigroup has donated extensively to Podesta's organization Center for American Progress, which is run by a Clinton campaign staffer.
Verizon has given extensively to Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
And don't forget that her campaign chairman's brother is one of the top super lobbyists in DC AND one of Hillary's top campaign donors.
dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)Come on guys, I know you love your candidate but can you PLEASE think of how this would play in the GE if she won (which, lets be honest, she has little chance of that now)?
Between this and the news about the classified information - we would NEVER countenance this from a Republican. Wed be calling for their heads on a pike and some of you would be leading the charge.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Sadly, having a "D" next to your name means people will defend you for doing things they oppose when the letter is an "R".
dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)It really shouldnt be like this. Were supposed to be different from Republicans.
CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)This needs to go viral!
scottie55
(1,400 posts)Laid Bare
For All To See
It's not just the Clintons. They aren't that bad. It's the whole damn system.
The system some other candidate is running to change.
For Good.
ancianita
(36,023 posts)Bernblu
(441 posts)riversedge
(70,187 posts)Phlem
(6,323 posts)amborin
(16,631 posts)bhikkhu
(10,715 posts)...such as is to be expected toward the end of an election cycle.
https://www.blankrome.com/index.cfm?contentID=37&itemID=2325
gives more of the actual story. The old swiss banking tradition of secrecy is over, they lost, though they nay benefit in the long run from having a more sound and legal basis. What UBS got from Bill Clinton is hard to say, except maybe good advice on how to move forward and avoid more vastly expensive errors in judgement..
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)Bill is credible when it comes to matters of judgement, given his stunning lack of judgement of accepting $1.5 million when he knew Hilliary intended to run for president.
Furthermore who gives a damn whether the Swiss have changed, the point is that nothing has changed here. Those 52,000 American accounts were worth $18 billion in tax avoidance. The deal that was struck just got a a handful of those accounts.
"Former Justice Department lawyer Stu Gibson in charge of prosecuting UBS said the process leading to resolution raises questions that need to be addressed, or should be addressed.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/hillary-clintons-scandalous-record/5466466
bhikkhu
(10,715 posts)and all of the 52,000 accounts were disclosed in 2010.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Time for Hillary to step aside.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)the entire DC establishment is sleep-walking the US into a mire of corruption and corporate
control, via the Clinton Dynasty.
TryLogic
(1,722 posts)snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)Bill's emails were on that server and if so would his email have been read.
That both are in on this money making scheme is what makes all this so reprehensible. It seems like she sees an opportunity and he follows up without the scrutiny Hilliary would be under.
raindaddy
(1,370 posts)Don't think the Republican candidate won't bring it up...
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)raindaddy
(1,370 posts)An then the echo chamber would've spread through the main stream corporate media.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)by any means necessary, but I think that's already taken
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)their "whatever it takes" meme.
This race has emphasized the need to kick out the corrupt Big Money politicians.
wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)you better hope your village helps you out,cause Hills sure as hell isn't going to.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)she was in the government .
snort
(2,334 posts)So maybe sometimes you've gotta step on somebody's face to reach the top shelf. Too fuckin bad, people. Only the grabbers have it all. Be a grabber.
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,349 posts)Thanks for the thread, snagglepuss.
Arazi
(6,829 posts)amborin
(16,631 posts)amborin
(16,631 posts)The charitable foundation run by Hillary Clinton and her family has received as much as $81m from wealthy international donors who were clients of HSBCs controversial Swiss bank.
Leaked files from HSBCs Swiss banking division reveal the identities of seven donors to the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation with accounts in Geneva.
They include Frank Giustra, a Canadian mining magnate and one of the foundations biggest financial backers, and Richard Caring, the British retail magnate who, the banks internal records show, used his tax-free Geneva account to transfer $1m into the New York-based foundation.
https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=Hillary+Clinton+swiss+banks
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
amborin
(16,631 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)$1.5 million payment to Bill is forgotten. Part of their scam is to have people view them as separate individuals but they're a money-making team, that UBS payment was as much as a payment her as it was to him.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)Is America is best served by a president and first spouse who care so little about preserving the confidence that the public can reasonably have in the integrity of their actions?