2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBill Clinton: Hillary lives by her Christian faith
Days before the Iowa caucuses, Bill Clinton is making sure the electorate, many of whom are evangelical Christians, knows that Hillary lives by her Christian faith.
... explaining that the best way to understand his wife Hillary Clinton is through her Methodist Christian faith.
"It took my breath away when I realized 45 years ago that is really what motivates her
That is what she has lived by."
In a piece published by The Christian Post last September, Mark Tooley, president of the Institute on Religion & Democracy:
"To my knowledge, Hillary has not been a regular church goer since leaving the White House 14 years ago.
http://www.christianpost.com/news/bill-clinton-hillary-christian-faith-156190/#bL4oYQCK1872jIO9.99
(Is this the Clinton way of saying: "Hey! Sanders's not a Christian."
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)This guy should talk... When is the last time either one of them went to church... Oh she does it on line every Sunday... John Hagey out of Texas perhaps... "The Lord wants Tax Cuts!"
reformist2
(9,841 posts)immoderate
(20,885 posts)--imm
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Wouldn't opposing a person's candidacy because of his or religion be tantamount to opposing him or her for lack of one?
immoderate
(20,885 posts)for the job. I really don't like what I know of Hillary's religious creepiness. Religion is irrational.
--imm
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)IMHO, I think this is just another example of Hillary Clinton being held to a different standard. Our current president isn't reluctant to talk about his faith as were many of his predecessors.
immoderate
(20,885 posts)with a Washington prayer group that is quite reactionary. If you don't know about it I can probably find a link.
--imm
dsc
(52,157 posts)immoderate
(20,885 posts)They may be disqualified as well. IMO.
--imm
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)dsc
(52,157 posts)and it wasn't Hillary talking it was Bill, I would bet Carter's wife has talked about his faith on more than one occasion.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)Punkingal
(9,522 posts)pandr32
(11,580 posts)mmonk
(52,589 posts)earthside
(6,960 posts)... lives by her Christian faith ... and the check is in the mail.
And Hillarians wonder why so many people are cynical about Mrs. Clinton.
I don't think this is a retort to Sanders, I think this is pandering pure and simple.
I'm also a bit surprised at how ineffective Bill Clinton has become as a surrogate; nothing lasts forever and I think even his days as a persuasive politician may be fading.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Ron Green
(9,822 posts)The Church of the Iron Rooster
Nanjeanne
(4,951 posts)But I won't hold that against her. I prefer looking at her stances on policies.
farleftlib
(2,125 posts)Benghazi, Iraq, Libya, Syria.
Matthew 7:15-17
You Will Know Them by Their Fruits
15 Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheeps clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. 16 You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles? 17 Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit."
onecaliberal
(32,829 posts)How many deaths is she responsible for?
saltpoint
(50,986 posts)meant 'demographic pandering proclivity.'
So yeah. Likely a typo.
Metric System
(6,048 posts)DURHAM D
(32,609 posts)And, it has never offended me as she lives her life by the social gospel. If you don't know that you are just not paying attention.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)At the risk of appearing predictable, the Bible was and remains the biggest influence on my thinking. I was raised reading it, memorizing passages from it and being guided by it. I still find it a source of wisdom, comfort and encouragement.
From June 11, 2014:
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/15/books/review/hillary-rodham-clinton-by-the-book.html?ref=review&_r=1
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I don't have much money myself ...There is a McDonalds by my home...It seems they are magnets for homeless people. I often see a homeless person and ask myself What Would Jesus Do? and buy them lunch.
My girlfriend gives ten percent of her salary to charity. If you ask her why she will tell you that is what her faith instructs her to do
I don't believe faith is a bad thing.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)to tell her to act kindly to another human being?
dsc
(52,157 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)Do you really think MLK needed some voice in the sky to tell him what was right and wrong?
saltpoint
(50,986 posts)King would know the right thing to do no matter what religious affiliation he claimed, or even if he claimed none at all.
"It says in the Bible I'm supposed to do charitable things, so I do them." Jesus. That doesn't sound very thoughtful to me.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)to tell him what is right and wrong?
I don't think so.
saltpoint
(50,986 posts)Seems like he knows right from wrong without a formal affiliation.
Must have been some thousands of thousands of people pre-year 1 who knew right from wrong as well. Probably a stew of different religious notions and cultures and traditions, including none at all, and I'm guessing they mostly knew how to treat other people.
God I am just puking over Hillary's pandering. She needs to hire somebody with a far better ear for contemporary reality than she has. I honor anybody with a degree representing academic achievement, no matter who it is or where they are. But once in while, in Hillary's case, the old Goldwater Girl re-emerges.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)That would just be better marketing. LYING, DISTORTING, TWISTING.
What she needs, in my view, is to tell the truth - to herself, about herself, and to others.
She is a manipulator and, as you so rightly say, a panderer, as are 99.9 % of politicians.
BERNIE is one of the very, very few who is different...
saltpoint
(50,986 posts)through U.S. history -- how politicians gain and hold power and what Power means to an individual human.
I think Sanders is himself up there speaking to those large & enthusiastic audiences. If he is without many natural advantages Hillary has, Bernie is getting through with that authenticity. His approval ratings back this up. (Her approval ratings also back this up, as they're far lower.)
I think of John Kennedy. He was able to read Sorenson's language because it was not language unfamiliar to his own ears or heart. Reagan's handlers made him a political profile but long before the dementia diagnosis, Ronald Reagan was imbecilic. He seemed to have no idea at all what the words coming out of his mouth meant. He understood only that he was supposed to say them with conviction while the media noted the Statue of Liberty in the background. Kennedy viscerally understood the language, had heard it in his classical education courses, used it himself with diverse minds he and Jackie invited to the White House.
Hillary has none of that. It wounds her among true progressives. I wonder through the weeks and months of this campaign what Elizabeth Warren must be thinking. I would have loved to have her more front and center in the party's machinations.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)I went to JFK's funeral. I was 20.
Bernie is so rare because he is just being himself. Whether he writes his speeches, someone else, a combination, it is still him being genuine.
And people criticize him for constantly 'harping' on wealth inequality and money in politics. Over and over and over. Even I was starting to wish he would move farther afield. ( He does of course...) BUT, he knows like a laser that those two facts are perhaps the main reason everything else is so screwed up. Nobody can or will tell the truth.
And yes, what in the world must Warren be thinking about it all.
Response to pangaia (Reply #33)
Name removed Message auto-removed
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)Response to uppityperson (Reply #87)
Name removed Message auto-removed
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)I feel sorry for you if the only reason you do anything good is to gain something.
Doing something so someone else feels better or to decrease their suffering is "weak" because you personally gain nothing? Understanding other people's problems is "weak"?
I guess you think MLKjr a weak fool then?
Response to uppityperson (Reply #91)
Name removed Message auto-removed
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)yourself, not to reward someone. I feel for you that you are unable to understand simple decency for its own sake.
Response to uppityperson (Reply #93)
Name removed Message auto-removed
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)So no, we don't need faith. I feel for you because of who I am. I have no "faith" in you or any sort of higher power, god, or any sort of outcome.
I am sorry that you are unable to understand altruism.
Response to uppityperson (Reply #96)
Name removed Message auto-removed
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)This is a backdoor Jesus endorsement.
It is tiresome enough, listening to Republicans pander in this way.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)hanging out with the right wingers in "the family" tells me even more about her "faith" than Bill's heavy handed pandering.
DURHAM D
(32,609 posts)We got to talking about the upcoming primary and I quoted this -
"...we should do all that we can, in whatever ways we can, for all the people we can, for as long as we can"
I asked them who said it. They both responded it was probably John Wesley? I told them they were right but Hillary had quoted John at a recent town hall when she was asked about her faith. I added that she has lived it all of her life. We discussed her, John, and living by the social gospel for awhile.
Anyway, they arrived at lunch uncommitted and left as Hillary supporters.
John Wesley's full quote -
"Do all the good you can. By all the means you can. In all the ways you can. In all the places you can. At all the times you can. To all the people you can. As long as ever you can."
jftr - I am agnostic but ethnic Methodist.
retrowire
(10,345 posts)-Then she wouldn't be against legalization, which is only going to aid the school to prison pipeline for black youth and help out her private prison business partners.
-Then she wouldn't have ever supported DOMA.
-Then she wouldn't be so adamantly against Universal Healthcare.
-Then she wouldn't support the death penalty.
And honestly, she's damned if she does or doesn't about DOMA.
Supports it? Then she's for her faith and against the people.
Against it? Then she's for the people and against her faith.
Religion is slippery. She seems genuine at times, but... Too slow to make the right decision. Like the war in Iraq.
panader0
(25,816 posts)7wo7rees
(5,128 posts)Qutzupalotl
(14,302 posts)If her faith truly informed her decisions, where was it when life and death literally hung in the balance?
It would seem that her political life is more important than 100,000 Iraqis.
DURHAM D
(32,609 posts)left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)There was the rally in Indianola, Iowa, where Hillary Clinton told a crowd that it was the teachings of John Wesley, a founder of the Methodist religion, that had inspired her to seek the presidency.
I am a person of faith. I am a Christian. I am a Methodist, she said. My study of the Bible, my many conversations with people of faith, has led me to believe the most important commandment is to love your neighbor as yourself
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/30/us/politics/some-in-iowa-surprised-by-hillary-clintons-ease-with-faith.html
saltpoint
(50,986 posts)striving in all daily acts to replicate his quietude, pursuing the contemplative path through the dark wilderness...
Dear god I'm tearing up at her reverence for Christ's teachings...
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)saltpoint
(50,986 posts)help but well up with tears when Hillary whips out her Methodist faith.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)saltpoint
(50,986 posts)campaign going on and from the onset. She doesn't need to drag in the Methodist Church as well.
Heard an interesting quotation once: "Methodists are Baptists who can read."
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)mikehiggins
(5,614 posts)Makes sense to me.
Not.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)doesn't the evangelical crowd vote overwhelmingly republican, making this issue relatively moot in a dem primary?
"At the other end of the political spectrum, nearly eight-in-ten white evangelical Protestants voted for Romney (79%), compared with 20% who backed Obama."
from pew forum
DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)Much less a "man of faith". If he wins Iowa they will flat out call him a "godless communist".
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)wow those clintons are just a class act all the way......
firebrand80
(2,760 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)have a variety of issues they prioritize unlike evangelical "prolife" republicans who are basically one issue voters.
firebrand80
(2,760 posts)many older AA are quite socially conservative on a range of issues. GWB had a moderately successful effort to reach out to those voters.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)the white ones went romney.
but without an aa candidate, i wonder how that could change things
of course, theres always carson..
firebrand80
(2,760 posts)Sanders doesn't seem to be making inroads
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Because that faith was EVIL!
DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)Didn't call him "Pander Bear" for nothing.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)"We came, we saw, he died?"
Which nation full of brown people would Jesus cluster bomb?
Shall we go into what the bible had to say about the rich?
"Christian faith," my ass.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)i'll start
But whoever has this worlds goods, and sees his brother in need, and shuts up his heart from him, how does the love of God abide in him? [1 John 3:17 KJV]
1 john 3:17 kjv
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)but i won't type what i think is implied except to say it probably contains a three letter word and maybe "commie" as well
mikehiggins
(5,614 posts)Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)It took his breath away? Seriously?
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)Kall
(615 posts)vis a vis the "not bearing false witness" thing, as she was making up stories like being under sniper fire in Bosnia.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Not sure I want a fundy in the White House...
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)The people who most care whether a politician is a "good christian" or not are the right-wing evangelicals. Not a one of them is going to believe Bill Clinton about anything, much less Hillary Clinton's overwhelming piety. When you're hearing ads that ted Cruz doesn't tithe enough, you have to understand that this is a lost cause.
And it's not much of a benefit for Democratic Christians, either, who tend to strongly support a separation of church and state. Crowing that Hillary Clinton "Lives by her christian faith" just raises doubts on that important issue, and brings some really ugly comparisons between Christian teaching and Hillary Clinton's political record. I do not think Yeshua ben Yoseph would sell cluster bombs to Saudi Arabia.
DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)Might get more backlash
jillan
(39,451 posts)After hearing her supporters refer to her opponent as "that socialist Jew from New York named Beeernieee"....
How low can they go?!
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Who knew?
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)that says something about not killing isn't part of her faith?
I keep on being blown away by self-avowed "Christians" who support the death penalty and cheerfully bomb civilians in far off countries.
Dems to Win
(2,161 posts)All this 'took my breath away' and talking about when he fell in love with her.... just yuck. All I can think of his is philandering and wondering why Hillary puts up with it.
There may be good reasons to elect her as president (I will vote for her if she's the nominee) but the Great Love Story of Bill and Hillary sure isn't one of them.
Faux pas
(14,668 posts)and blaring the DOG WHISTLE. could have a lower opinion of the clintons if I lived to be 150.
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)read it from cover to cover.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)Hey Willy her not attending church is her not living by her faith.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)Christianity against the athiest Jew". More or less anyway but spot on whoever you are.
frylock
(34,825 posts)But He really hates people
Who color outside the lines
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Odin2005
(53,521 posts)DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)Blind ambition is a powerful thing.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)Exodus 20:16* You shall not give false testimony against your neighbor."
They lie about Bernie all the time.
i.e. "He'll destroy Medicare, Medicaid, etc ..."
*As Trump would call it, "Exodus two-zero, one-six"
Nanjeanne
(4,951 posts)[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]
ecstatic
(32,688 posts)Just take it at face value.
You're not doing Bernie any favors with this: A thread filled with people attacking Hillary, attacking Christians, not to mention extreme (and unwarranted) paranoia.
Just stop.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)Well, we just can't have that!
Clinton supporters never attack Bernie or Bernie supporters.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)WH she attended prayer meetings with The Family a very rw conservative group.