Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 02:47 PM Jan 2016

Sanders, Clinton Campaigns Agree To More Debates

MANCHESTER, Iowa — The campaigns of the two major candidates for the Democratic nomination have agreed to hold four more debates, should they be sanctioned, sources from both the Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders campaigns tell BuzzFeed News.

The details — where and when — remain unresolved, and the Democratic National Committee has not yet agreed to the arrangement, the Clinton and Sanders sources said.

“Once dates and cities are locked down, we are looking forward to four additional debates,” a person close to the Sanders campaign told BuzzFeed News. A source close to the Clinton campaign confirmed that account, saying that aides in Brooklyn have agreed to what the Sanders campaign asked for earlier this week.

Both sides, still in separate negotiations with DNC officials, have agreed to attend the “unsanctioned” Feb. 4 debate in New Hampshire hosted by the Union Leader and MSNBC, should that event go forward, in addition to three others, to be held at later dates.


http://www.buzzfeed.com/evanmcsan/sanders-clinton-campaigns-agree-to-more-debates#.huJ7r537d
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sanders, Clinton Campaigns Agree To More Debates (Original Post) Bjorn Against Jan 2016 OP
good news. lasttrip Jan 2016 #1
"should they be sanctioned" - ball is in DWS' court. n/t PoliticAverse Jan 2016 #2
She already said she would not sanction that debate nt Jarqui Jan 2016 #3
with clinton in trouble Robbins Jan 2016 #6
She may be ticked that Hillary put her in this spot Jarqui Jan 2016 #8
Yay! Mike Nelson Jan 2016 #4
What this means Robbins Jan 2016 #5
More debates, great but not opposite football games! Paper Roses Jan 2016 #7
Can we at least try to beat the republicans in rating once? Half-Century Man Jan 2016 #9
If nothing else, this emphasizes the complete failure that Debbie Wasserman Schultz has been. DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #10
Debate night!!!! Debate night!!!! Oh crap, I'm up at 3:00 AM all american girl Jan 2016 #11

Jarqui

(10,122 posts)
8. She may be ticked that Hillary put her in this spot
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 03:02 PM
Jan 2016

Basically, Hillary said "screw what DWS did for us, I'm in trouble and I need more debates!" instead of going to DWS behind the scenes and trying to work something out to save face.

Paper Roses

(7,471 posts)
7. More debates, great but not opposite football games!
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 02:59 PM
Jan 2016

Prime time, week nights. Good.
Opposite mega events, not so good.

Go Bernie!

Half-Century Man

(5,279 posts)
9. Can we at least try to beat the republicans in rating once?
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 03:10 PM
Jan 2016

Is it too much to ask that we, as the Democratic Party, try to gain the most possible exposure?

Can we please act like the party of the overwhelming majority of Americans? Even if we have to fake it, can we act like we are proud of who we are.

Just fucking once.

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
10. If nothing else, this emphasizes the complete failure that Debbie Wasserman Schultz has been.
Sat Jan 30, 2016, 03:46 PM
Jan 2016

Seriously, the candidates shouldn't need to beg the chair of the DNC for more debates. I really wish the President had chosen a DNC chair who DOESN'T campaign for Republicans. Debbie Wasserman Schultz: You are thoroughly corrupt, and you need to go away now.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Sanders, Clinton Campaign...