2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNew...Nate Silver...Hillary 80% chance to win Iowa
According to our latest polls-plus forecast, Hillary Clinton has a 80% chance of winning the Iowa caucuses.
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/election-2016/primary-forecast/iowa-democratic/

DemocratSinceBirth
(100,720 posts)I welcome others to check my math.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Is that right DSB?
I would call that a Clinton surge just days before the caucus!
DemocratSinceBirth
(100,720 posts)Add up the amount of respondents to the last five polls, add em up, and calculate the margin of error. It's 1.73.
It's math, not magic.
jfern
(5,204 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Big assumption.
I must be one of those really lazy Hillary supporters...
Oh DU.
Anyways good on you for getting involved!
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)As usual
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)Quixote1818
(30,834 posts)Clearly Hillary has a better shot but it's so close anything can happen. If I was told there was a 20% chance I could have cancer I would be freaking out. I would not be surprised at all to see Sanders squeek it out.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)a state tailor made for him? Like 90 some percent white northern state.
It means he's dead in the water starting in South Carolina
And he will get wasted come super tuesday.
But I'm not conceding Iowa at all! Nate says 80% chance for a Hillary victory. I will take that all day long lol
Quixote1818
(30,834 posts)and we will be stuck with the status quo with the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer, more war entanglements. If that gets you excited then enjoy your wages staying stagnant and another Wall Street crash in a few years.



Fearless
(18,458 posts)stonecutter357
(12,822 posts)
thesquanderer
(12,530 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)So it really wouldn't affect the race.
I can't remember where but you could probably Google it sorry.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)


Response to workinclasszero (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)From Politico last year:
Read more: http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2015/05/nate-silver-polls-are-failing-us-206799#ixzz3ymu1SBmg
Having said that, recent polls are going in Hillary's direction, but polls don't tell you exactly what will go on come the big day.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)I know this.
But in the meantime I'm feeling good about my candidates chances.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)
SidDithers
(44,329 posts)Sid
JI7
(91,559 posts)a lot of Sander's supporters are in college towns which means their votes are "wasted"
JI7
(91,559 posts)as a result they would not be counted in the polls .
hill2016
(1,772 posts)lots of democrats in California and New York but their votes are wasted. Much better to have them in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Florida etc.
Same thing here. Many of Sander's supporters are in college towns, which award proportionately less delegates than rural Iowa counties.
joshcryer
(62,515 posts)If Sanders gets the popular vote but loses the delegate count, it will be interesting to see how caucus defenders react. I think it will be a bullshit outcome if that's what it comes to.
JI7
(91,559 posts)number of delegates is fixed at the county level.
hence the college student votes are wasted.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Man's got skills and brains.
w4rma
(31,700 posts)He's got serious blind spots.