2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumLets meet Hillary's Biggest donor
Saban is not shy about throwing his weight around. In 2001, when Brazilian regulatory approval became a roadblock to the sale of Fox Family, the company he founded with Rupert Murdoch, he asked Bill Clinton to call the president of Brazil to push for a quick approval. When the deal went through, Saban personally made $1.5 billion; the next year he gave a record-breaking $7 million to the Democratic Party for a new national headquarters and $5 million to Clintons presidential library.
The New York Times reported in 2009 that Saban was apparently part of a scheme before the 2006 Democratic takeover of Congress in which Saban would threaten then-Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi that he would withhold donations if Pelosi didnt make then-Rep. Jane Harman, D-Calif., chair of the House Intelligence Committee. (In return, according to the Times report, which was based on telephone calls intercepted by the National Security Agency, Harman would lobby the Bush administration for leniency for two pro-Israel lobbyists under investigation for espionage. Harman denied ever speaking to the Justice Department about the case, but did not address whether she contacted any White House officials.)
And according to a high-ranking official of the Young Democrats of America, during the 2008 Democratic presidential primary Saban offered to donate $1 million to the YDA if the organizations two super delegates committed to Hillary Clinton.
https://theintercept.com/2016/01/26/ha-ha-hillary-clintons-top-financial-supporter-now-controls-the-onion/
cali
(114,904 posts)nolabels
(13,133 posts)The idea is no longer to drown the baby in the bathwater. The new idea for them, that now that government (and a lot of other institutions) are small and docile enough that they can be influenced easy enough with just a few levers to do the bidding of the ownership class why make any drastic changes. And after all, you should not complain because you do understand the future of your employment is very dependent on how you do for the Ownership.
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)You want to be free and dead? Id rather be not free and alive, billionaire and Hillary Clinton supporter tells TheWrap
Media mogul Haim Saban, one of Hillary Clintons biggest backers in Hollywood, said that the U.S. should step up its scrutiny of Muslims in the wake of the deadly ISIS attacks in Paris.
http://www.thewrap.com/hollywood-mogul-haim-saban-more-scrutiny-muslims-profiling-hillary-clinton/
longship
(40,416 posts)And his followers on.
Who would go for that?
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)SamKnause
(13,091 posts)Corruption.
Absolutely disgusting.
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)longship
(40,416 posts)EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)Is Tony Podesta... Considered to be one of the few Super Lobbiests. And one of DC's most influential power brokers.
He owns a lobbying firm - with his brother - that represents weapons manufacturers, Saudi Arabia and big pharma.
His brother, John, is Clinton's campaign chairman.
Go figure.
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)But none is worse than who she chose for the top of her campaign staff. IMO.
But it's definitely bears saying that she's surrounded by lobbyists. By choice.
It's her milieu.
chknltl
(10,558 posts)RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Sickening.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)one half of one percent
wow - good deal for someone
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)Until Americans stand up and take notice the Presidency will become cheaper to buy
reformist2
(9,841 posts)I think it's awful that people still can and do buy access to our political candidates. I mean we're supposed to be a democracy. And it's 2016. We all deserve to be heard. And yet some voices get to be heard a lot more than others. It's just so WRONG.
ejbr
(5,856 posts)I mean, you never said you hate her; and if you did, you explain why with supporting documentation. But I just find the hate for her more troublesome than any corruption. If the right hates her, then we have to love her. It's just that simple or we will be perceived as mysoginistic, wanting to hand the Supreme Court choices over to Donald Trump. I'm just grateful that most of her supporters are ignorant of or indifferent to this level of nefarious behavior.
thingy just to be clear
Good point and all, we get called on the carpet for ANY criticism of any other Dem but Bernie, Him? You can bash all you want and how dare you point out the lying Bull shit.
Another consistent difference is that we speak to the concerns leveled against him; they seem to attack anyone who points out her issues. To be fair, this is not always the case, but given her history, I can't see how else they can "defend" her other than attacking the messengers.
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)much money has be raised by the candidates each reporting period. Then they would rank the chances of those politicians based on how much "bribe" campaign donations were collected. We used to rank our politicians on who was better at selling us out. Since Bernie's run they aren't quite as vocal about it now.
How messed up is that where we judge our candidates on who the big money supported? It's like we were in denial that Big Donor giving money to a politician resulted in Big Donor getting access and huge amounts of our tax dollars. Big Donors were having customized laws written to benefit themselves and our media reported it like it was a good thing!