2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum
hill2016
(1,772 posts)they haven't even started...
Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)Nanjeanne
(5,973 posts)book_worm
(15,951 posts)It's too early.
elleng
(138,892 posts)based on 'entrance polling,' OH FFS!!!
msnbc announcing this polling, and at the same time, calling them very unreliable.
jcgoldie
(12,046 posts)They are basing it on interviews with people in line to go into caucuses... reported by Pelley on CBS. Hillary 53 - Bernie 40 based on interviews with early arrivers.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)But too early to call. No clue how. Very small rural or some form of possible absentee participation. Either way it can't be much of a sign for anything. I will say Sanders strongest places will probably come in a little later than most.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)But they said Hillary appears to have a lead
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Soon!
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Are saying now thanks
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)CNN is saying that the number of first time caucus goers is way down from 2008, where 60% of caucus goers were new. Only about 42% are new this time around. Not great news for Sanders.
Nanjeanne
(5,973 posts)they haven't been accounted for yet in entry poll data I'm sure.
These people in this tweet haven't even gotten inside yet.
Peter Doocy ?@pdoocy 18m18 minutes ago
hundreds of students registering as dems on the spot to caucus for Sanders here in Ames, IA. Many more than expected
[URL=

