Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum"Gwen Ifill debunks five myths about presidential debates" By Gwen Ifill at WP
Gwen Ifill debunks five myths about presidential debatesBy Gwen Ifill at WP
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/gwen-ifill-debunks-five-myths-about-presidential-debates/2012/09/28/3eb71112-067f-11e2-858a-5311df86ab04_story.html
"SNIP............................................
As President Obama and Mitt Romney take the stage in Denver on Wednesday for the first of their three debates, they wont just face off against each other. Theyll also be competing with the rich history of presidential debates the zingers, questions and comebacks that will be replayed and invoked over and over in the coming weeks. Ive had the privilege to moderate the two most recent vice presidential debates, and Ive heard many misconceptions about these events and their impact on a race. Here are a few of the most common.
1. Voters use debates to decide.
For many voters, televised presidential debates serve to focus the mind. Seeing the men who would be president yes, always men, so far face off helps viewers finally choose a side.
But debates are only part of the American voters political diet. Like 30-second ads or stump speeches, they do as much to confirm impressions as to alter them. Think back to some memorable debate moments. Did George H.W. Bush glancing at his watch really persuade people to vote for Bill Clinton, or did it confirm the worst suspicions of those already leaning away from him? Did Lloyd Bentsen dismissing Dan Quayle as no Jack Kennedy lose the election for Michael Dukakis, or did it speak to an existing worry that Bush lacked the judgment to pick a No. 2 who could assume the presidency?
Minds were already made up. Gallup polls going back decades show precious little shift in established voter trends before and after debates. The major exception: 1960, when Gallup suggests that Richard Nixons lackluster, sweaty performance against John F. Kennedy moved a dead-heat campaign into the Democrats column and thats where it stayed.
...........................................SNIP"
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1142 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Gwen Ifill debunks five myths about presidential debates" By Gwen Ifill at WP (Original Post)
applegrove
Sep 2012
OP
PearliePoo2
(7,768 posts)1. Gwen...you let Sarah Moose-Killer from the north have her way with you.
Remember...she refused to answer your questions, pivoted to her own talking points and you let her get away with it.
Bummer on you.
About as effective as getting strategic advice from Donna "earthtones" Brazille.