2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI saw Hillary talking with..
Chris Matthews and she made a very valid point. The congress how is anything going to get done with them?
I've thought about that myself.
oasis
(49,376 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)oasis
(49,376 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)pnwmom
(108,976 posts)have insurance who didn't have it before.
And no one who gets sick or pregnant has to worry about losing their insurance now. And no baby is born already deemed uninsurable because of a preexisting condition.
Jarqui
(10,123 posts)That's a key part of Bernie's revolution.
And that's a pretty simple pitch: "America, these bribed obstructionists have done a lousy job representing you, putting their own interests ahead of the people they serve, and they need to be fired. They're now in the way of getting rid of the rigged system and economy. On Nov (whatever), give them their walking papers and go with these candidates ...." (maybe primary them like the tea party did to the GOP)
I think it would be a great campaign pitch. Ask America to fire them for doing a lousy job.
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)for anyone else, and that's what needs to be done.
Jarqui
(10,123 posts)He'd be raising money that could be used against himself.
He can start helping them out after the primary
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)entirely different leadership.
And he wouldn't be funding anyone who would be running against himself, but helping to build a majority in the Senate.
Jarqui
(10,123 posts)BOSNYCDC
(66 posts)pnwmom
(108,976 posts)able to accomplish anything legislatively with the current Congress, and so far, he hasn't been doing anything to change it. If he waits to the next election, that will be halfway through his term -- and only 1/3 of the Senate seats will even be up for a vote.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)Just because he's not raising money for the DNC doesn't mean he isn't raising money for Democrats.
BOSNYCDC
(66 posts)Enthusiasm = new Dem voters
New Dem voters = new Congressfolks
New Congressfolks = new ideas and legislation
Raising $ for status quo candidates = status quo
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)That's what the money is for anyway, he just cut out the money part. With Bernie at the top of the ticket, more Progressives, Liberals, Democrats will come out to vote on election day than they would for Hillary. Straight ticket voting would help the down-ballot candidates much better under Bernie.
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)So we'll see how many are still around in the general.
treestar
(82,383 posts)It's still too vague just saying "revolution." People have to campaign in specific districts. Figure out which ones the Republican can be removed from.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)Cause most people are happy with their congress people.
angel123
(79 posts)What makes you think the voters will fire this congress. There is nothing you can tell them that has not been said before. All the republicans have to tell them is that people coming across the border are taking jobs that they should have. Talk about voter fraud. Lead them to believe that democrats are coming for their guns. Talk about abortion, same sex marriage, affirmative action, sharia law,
and the muslims are coming.
Jarqui
(10,123 posts)Definition of insanity is to do the same thing over and over and expect a different result
People are responding to Bernie because he is addressing that through the issues he's talking about "rigged economy" "campaign finance" "Wall Street" etc
He's said he needs the support of the people if he's going to get it changed. That support has to come through the people changing congress. It's the only way to change the legislation.
And he is a spokesman for explaining to people what falling for the wedge issues does, etc
There are going to be dead heads who drag their knuckles following Trump around who will never buy in but we're about to find out if a majority of democrats will buy in.
Maybe they can take the Senate back this time and then work on regaining the house.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Sorry, but she's not the candidate that really gets people fired up and ready to go.
If she becomes President, she'll be dealing with a Republican Congress who will be highly motivated to be as hostile as possible to her. They'll be looking for an excuse to impeach, and just like with Obama, the rule will be "If she's for it, they're against it." Even if they used to be for it.
In fact, for that reason, I predict if she's President, she'll hardly be able to get jack shit done.
Bernie's inspirational enough that he has more of a chance of turning 2016 into a wave election and putting more Democrats in power.
one_voice
(20,043 posts)What about the areas that are gerrymandered? Won't make difference.
Playing devils advocate here, how friendly do you think a conservative congress is going to be to someone that's talking about 'free' (that's what they'll hear) education & healthcare. Raising taxes.
It's a valid concern for either of our candidates. I think WE need to get our asses working for our congress just as much as for the White House. Just my .02
treestar
(82,383 posts)Not everything is "fired up" and it's not such a big drama. She had been raising money for lower level Dems. Of course that had to be "corrupt." Not everyone is a rabid Hillary hater.
Nanjeanne
(4,950 posts)especially if they want to get primaried. You thought the anti-Obama contingent was bad . . . wait for it to work its magic against Clinton.
The only way to fix the mess we are in is to fix the big problems - and Hillary won't do that. Bernie may not be able to - but he will damn sure try.
DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)to get any work done? They love her!
Avalux
(35,015 posts)I would like a Hillary supporter to tell me exactly HOW she will get anything done with a Republican Congress. She has declared Republicans her enemy, they went after her with a vengeance over Benghazi, they absolutely hate Bill - I just don't see how she will get anything done. The argument works both ways.
one_voice
(20,043 posts)in fact I said it here : http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1123513
I wasn't arguing against Bernie. I asking a question. it's a valid point for both candidates. They will both have their struggles with a Republican congress.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)It won't be easy for either of them, but I think it might be more difficult for Hillary with her history.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)not just because they like his message, but because his last name is not Clinton and he was not part of the Obama administration.
These are voters who are not going to skip the presidential candidate and vote down ticket. GOTV falls apart with a Clinton candidacy, and raising money for those down ticket candidates and the DNC can't fix it.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)There seems to be no plan whatsoever. Once again, the plan is that this can all be done from the top.
Not one post here about any congressional district and who is running there, or any district now with a Republican that might be turned.
And the gerrymandering took place because the Rs do not do what the Ds do - they pay attention to the state and local.
Hillary is at least helping lower level Democrats and helping raise funds for them.
JudyM
(29,233 posts)worked into the affordable care act:
https://theintercept.com/2015/07/06/gop-senators-support-sanders-obamacare-expansion/
He's been in congress for decades and is widely well regarded despite his non-mainstream positions. His word is trusted and he knows how to work within the system to make progress. Contrast: Hillary is widely vilified, whether warranted or not. So if we get a lot more seats, thats great; and if we don't, which would be the one more effective at getting legislation through?
TCJ70
(4,387 posts)...aside from many stances she also holds closely, how would she get anything done? This isn't an argument against Sanders, as I'd rather have someone I trust to call out the BS, but more of an argument against congress.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)...did then his criticisms of the "establishment" become petulant at best
arcane1
(38,613 posts)This seems to be a variation of the standard cop-out to me.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)one_voice
(20,043 posts)If it did I'd appreciate it if you'd point that out to me. Maybe I should have clarified further in my OP. Or maybe people shouldn't be so quick to rush to assume things. I'm not your enemy. I'm an undecided voter.
Even if I were a Hillary voter I'm not your enemy. Republicans are your enemy. I have no interest in 'fighting' with anyone. I will discuss any topic though. But if you come at me in a 'fight stance' not gonna happen.
It was a general statement. It wasn't against against Bernie or for Hillary.
Here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1123513
arcane1
(38,613 posts)She bills herself as the only one who can "get things done" but never lets us know what those things are, or why she's the only one who can do them.
one_voice
(20,043 posts)notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)That's the only time she used the word "we." Any other time it is me and I.
catnhatnh
(8,976 posts)I saw Lon Chaney, Jr. walking with the Queen
Doing the Werewolves of London
I saw a werewolf drinking a pina colada at Trader Vic's
And his hair was perfect