Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RitchieRich

(292 posts)
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 10:16 AM Sep 2012

Paul Ryan: (Rape) "the method of conception doesn't change the definition of life"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/paul-slansky-/paul-ryan-said-something-_b_1832377.htmlv

Paul Ryan Said Something That Should Force Him Off the Ticket, But You Probably Didn't Hear About It


Last week, Paul Ryan gave an interview in which, defending his position that there should be no excuses for abortion, he referred to rape as a "method of conception."

Wow, right? Talk about a benign euphemism. Rape -- RAPE! -- is now a "method of conception." You know, like love-making, just without the love.

There could be no greater testament to the utter abdication of responsibility by what passes for a "news" media in America in 2012 than that, despite the grotesquerie of this cavalierly callous comment, chances are better than good that this is the first you're hearing of it.

Here, watch it -- and try to figure out why this has gotten NO MAINSTREAM MEDIA play (not even here at the Huffington Post) despite it being, to my mind, a far more offensive remark than Todd Akin's imbecilic blurt of last weekend. What, are we tired of stupid remarks about rape now, so Ryan gets a free pass?

Given the demands for Akin's resignation from a mere Senate race when his musings on "legitimate rape" were publicized, what do you imagine the reaction would be if people were as familiar with VP wannabe Ryan's stunning statement? Might there be a cacophony of outrage? Might there be calls for his resignation from the ticket? Might there be a focus on how fundamentally oblivious these people who would make our laws are to not just women's but humans' rights and dignity? Sure, there might, but then of course people would have to have heard about it.

According to the man who would be the proverbial heartbeat away from the White House, and who in any event would -- given Romney's utter hollowness -- have an inordinate influence on the judicial appointments that will determine how much freedom our children get to live under, RAPE = "METHOD OF CONCEPTION." And yet, unless you're a frequenter of one of a dozen or so lefty blogs -- or my friend on Facebook -- you probably knew nothing about it.

I truly despair for the country my 14-year-old daughter is inheriting. That a remark this intensely revealing of the danger posed by this ticket can go basically unreported is as nauseating to me as the quote itself.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Paul Ryan: (Rape) "the method of conception doesn't change the definition of life" (Original Post) RitchieRich Sep 2012 OP
intensely revealing of the danger posed by this ticket can go basically unreported is as nauseating lunasun Sep 2012 #1
Someone should ask him if his kids were conceived that way lunatica Sep 2012 #2
Why isn't that blasted out in the MSM more? gopiscrap Sep 2012 #3
Well... swishyfeet Sep 2012 #4
re his comment: says a man roguevalley Sep 2012 #5

lunasun

(21,646 posts)
1. intensely revealing of the danger posed by this ticket can go basically unreported is as nauseating
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 10:51 AM
Sep 2012

to me as the quote itself.
but if obama picks his nose it will be all over the news
I too have as my biggest despair what my future generations will have to endure
all will be good I hope

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
2. Someone should ask him if his kids were conceived that way
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 10:55 AM
Sep 2012

That would shut him up about rape.

Or ask him if he would feel that way if his daughter is raped. Hell! He'd probably just fall back on his "life begins at conception" fucked up crap.

swishyfeet

(1,156 posts)
4. Well...
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 11:26 AM
Sep 2012

Detestable as it may be, he's right. IF you believe that abortion = killing someone, then it should always be illegal.

On the other hand, if you think the idea of carrying your rapist's baby to term is the most repugnant and cruel thing you could possibly do to the victim, then you have to understand why there is no case for the government and it's laws to ever get involved in this most personal decision.

I think this no-exception talk is the line in the sand that pushes the moderates away from the GOP's wingnuttery.
Let him keep talking.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Paul Ryan: (Rape) "t...