Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 05:02 PM Sep 2012

GOP INSIDER: ROMNEY “STRATEGICALLY” PLACING MINORITIES AT RALLIES

Presidential candidate Mitt Romney is “strategically” placing minorities at his campaign rallies, according to a Republican insider.

Speaking to Politico, Republican strategist Ana Navarro – who worked for the McCain and Huntsman campaigns – alleges that when the Romney campaign stages its rallies, “You can almost invariably count on the row of women or black or brown people strategically placed in the audience.”

The allegation has surfaced at a time when it appears Romney is poised to perform worse with those constituent groups than John McCain did in 2008.

The ongoing Republican “war on women” via efforts to dictate birth control options to women has appeared to hurt the GOP in several polls. Similarly, Romney’s opposition to immigration reform has pushed back his party’s efforts to attract members of this growing, Democratic-leaning constituency.

Read more:
http://www.nationalconfidential.com/20120930/gop-insider-romney-strategically-placing-minorities-at-rallies/

42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
GOP INSIDER: ROMNEY “STRATEGICALLY” PLACING MINORITIES AT RALLIES (Original Post) DonViejo Sep 2012 OP
Why do they go? FarPoint Sep 2012 #1
think they get a coupon for oldhippydude Sep 2012 #3
That is a good one. FarPoint Sep 2012 #9
if they don't go... TheCowsCameHome Sep 2012 #12
That's if they don't show up, right? Scootaloo Sep 2012 #26
I wonder why they let themselves be used like that. ywcachieve Sep 2012 #28
Sure, there is no law against it. Sekhmets Daughter Oct 2012 #41
Seriously, there were people out there in the world that did not know this? aaaaaa5a Sep 2012 #2
they take the same group of black peeps from 2pooped2pop Sep 2012 #8
It wouldn't surprise me. aaaaaa5a Sep 2012 #21
Both sides do it? hootinholler Sep 2012 #19
These campaigns are made for TV events. The pictures are often worth more than the words. aaaaaa5a Sep 2012 #20
You are right. That person is just talking BS. ywcachieve Sep 2012 #30
Our side CindyinIndy Oct 2012 #38
I always wondered about the people standing behind the speaker ailsagirl Sep 2012 #25
Standing behing the speaker, maybe. matt819 Oct 2012 #32
Oh, definitely ailsagirl Oct 2012 #35
I certainly had a sullen one when I was standing behind Rozlee Oct 2012 #33
Both sides DO NOT do it. That is untrue. ywcachieve Sep 2012 #29
This has been obvious and has been commented upon Warpy Sep 2012 #4
Well, he's not fooling anyone. polichick Sep 2012 #5
Mitt uses women and minorities like duck decoys. SunSeeker Sep 2012 #6
Great analogy! beac Sep 2012 #13
I hope he's paying $10 an hour. It's hazard pay IMO...n/t monmouth Sep 2012 #7
$10 an hour isn't even close to a living wage obxhead Sep 2012 #11
Romney probably makes them Pay for their own meals and room. formercia Sep 2012 #18
File that under "Shit comma No" Orrex Sep 2012 #10
This MOTHER FUCKER is doing that repeatedly through out the campaign bigdarryl Sep 2012 #14
If they treated people who weren't like them nice they might not have to do this. NCLefty Sep 2012 #15
Yeah? And how is that working out? geckosfeet Sep 2012 #16
So the 47% are useful for crowd plantings. L0oniX Sep 2012 #17
Well.....yes. They HAVE to. They don't have that many to go around... desertduck Sep 2012 #22
It's an old GOP tradition jsr Sep 2012 #23
duh nt cash__whatiwant Sep 2012 #24
LOL!! As an minority, underthematrix Sep 2012 #27
OMG. Seriously? Has that happened? nt SunSeeker Oct 2012 #31
To quote Joe 47of74 Oct 2012 #34
I've been suspecting this for a while. They have done the same with women also. Third Doctor Oct 2012 #36
It's stories like this Proud Liberal Dem Oct 2012 #37
Wait. I thought Republicans hated affirmative action programs. tanyev Oct 2012 #39
duzy! mac56 Oct 2012 #40
Wrong thread. sinkingfeeling Oct 2012 #42
 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
26. That's if they don't show up, right?
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 10:47 PM
Sep 2012

"Either you show up or we're sending you a pizza from Godfathers!" seems like it would be pretty successful as an intimidation tactic. Fucking nasty pizza, worse than frozen Red Baron.

aaaaaa5a

(4,667 posts)
2. Seriously, there were people out there in the world that did not know this?
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 05:11 PM
Sep 2012


All campaigns do this. Why do you think they have people standing behind the speaker at rallies? Its a terrible seat. Who wants to stare at the candidates back for an hour?


In 2008, the Obama campaign had some muslim supporters removed from standing behind the President because they thought it would convey the wrong image.


About a week ago, Romney had a rally where everyone standing behind him was a woman. What are the odds of that occurring randomly?


Strategically placing certain people at rallies is a part of any campaign. And it has been for years.
 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
8. they take the same group of black peeps from
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 06:26 PM
Sep 2012

stop to stop and that is normal?

I read here on DU that some were thinking that the black people at one rally are the same as at the others. If so, are you saying that this is normal, not only to put some faces in strategic positions, but to hire them to appear at all your stops?

aaaaaa5a

(4,667 posts)
21. It wouldn't surprise me.
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 08:22 PM
Sep 2012


Trying to find any minority to stand at a GOP event must be really hard to do.

aaaaaa5a

(4,667 posts)
20. These campaigns are made for TV events. The pictures are often worth more than the words.
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 08:21 PM
Sep 2012


View this link. Please judge for yourself.








ywcachieve

(365 posts)
30. You are right. That person is just talking BS.
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 11:05 PM
Sep 2012

AS I said, I have never heard of or seen the Dems plant certain ethnic persons to give the appearance of diversity. The Dems ARE DIVERSITY.

ailsagirl

(22,883 posts)
25. I always wondered about the people standing behind the speaker
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 10:44 PM
Sep 2012

But I like to watch their reactions-- that's probably why

Nitt's people have blank expressions

matt819

(10,749 posts)
32. Standing behing the speaker, maybe.
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 12:04 PM
Oct 2012

But seeding the crowd, I'm with the ones who call bullshit on this.

I can understand manipulating the people who sit behind the candidate. At this point that's been so overdone that it's really pointless. The obvious - or at least perceived to be obvious - manipulation of that group is a given, so to continue doing it is hardly worth the effort. It may be a reward of some sort to those given the opportunity, but it's really, well, overdone.

As for seeding the crowd, as has been reported by the those in the know about Romney. I can believe it about Romney, and it is disappointing that there are people who for a t-shirt or free lunch will take that job. But about the Obama campaign? If you can prove it, I'll eat these pixels. But I just can't see that happening. For one thing, the numbers are just too great. And the reality is that his crowds really are diverse, so it's not necessary.

ailsagirl

(22,883 posts)
35. Oh, definitely
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 02:45 PM
Oct 2012

The President has no reason to seed the crowd, and even if he had a scant turnout, he'd never do it. He's simply not that kind of person.
Nitt? No question about it.

Rozlee

(2,529 posts)
33. I certainly had a sullen one when I was standing behind
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 12:33 PM
Oct 2012

Senator John Cornyn when he was touring Brooke Army Medical Center and we had to cluster around him while he touted his devotion to the troops. As a native Texan, I knew what he was all about even though many of the out-of-staters were clueless. They were kind of glum as well, though. They knew what politicians were all about.

ywcachieve

(365 posts)
29. Both sides DO NOT do it. That is untrue.
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 11:02 PM
Sep 2012

I have never seen or heard of Dems planting certain ethnic groups. NEVER<>

Warpy

(111,120 posts)
4. This has been obvious and has been commented upon
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 05:14 PM
Sep 2012

ever since those laughable GOP primary "debates" started last year.

SunSeeker

(51,502 posts)
6. Mitt uses women and minorities like duck decoys.
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 05:44 PM
Sep 2012

He hopes to lure others by making them think it's safe because there are some already there. Don't do it, unless you want to get hit with economic buckshot!

 

obxhead

(8,434 posts)
11. $10 an hour isn't even close to a living wage
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 07:20 PM
Sep 2012

let alone hazard pay.

Knowing Romney though, he's probably paying less than minimum wage when all factors are considered.

formercia

(18,479 posts)
18. Romney probably makes them Pay for their own meals and room.
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 07:49 PM
Sep 2012

The other choice is to sleep in the rental truck with the other props.

Joke in the Romney camp: How many Minorities can you pack into a Hotel Room?

Orrex

(63,168 posts)
10. File that under "Shit comma No"
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 07:19 PM
Sep 2012

It's like how the MSM manages to find and interview the one African American at a TeaBagger rally or Libertarian convention, in a desperate effort to create an impression of diversity without actually risking actual diversity.

NCLefty

(3,678 posts)
15. If they treated people who weren't like them nice they might not have to do this.
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 07:35 PM
Sep 2012

I cannot beLIEVE what they did to the Latino community. Here, let's alienate a MASSIVE constituency that's going to dominate in the years to come. The level of stupidity is mind-boggling. They are either so scared of others or too short-sighted to realize what they've done.

The only people they want are white, straight, and preferably male.

AS YOU WISH, SIRE.

desertduck

(213 posts)
22. Well.....yes. They HAVE to. They don't have that many to go around...
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 10:20 PM
Sep 2012

This shouldn't be surprising to anyone.

underthematrix

(5,811 posts)
27. LOL!! As an minority,
Sun Sep 30, 2012, 10:55 PM
Sep 2012

may I make a suggestion to the GOPKKK? try using "minority" actors so you don't end up with minorities looking confused and angry when they discover they are at a mittnocchio rally instead of a job fair.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,391 posts)
37. It's stories like this
Mon Oct 1, 2012, 03:35 PM
Oct 2012

that make me wonder why some people think that this race is "close". This is simply NOT the kind of stuff a strong/winning candidate does.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»GOP INSIDER: ROMNEY “STRA...