Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ancianita

(36,009 posts)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 08:08 AM Feb 2016

Media Try to Make Hillary's Telling A Secret Service Agent To "Fuck Off" A Campaign Issue

First, as a Bernie supporter, I will say this: when it comes to the Secret Service, Hillary's got nothing to prove.

Second, since when is the Secret Service's two cents about any presidential candidate relevant at all.

Third, if Secret Service personnel's opinions are so important, then they should have to comment on all the presidential candidates whom they allegedly protect.

Fourth, in case you don't think sexism's no-win double standards have begun, they have.

Let's get this straight.

It is a rule of service that Secret Service are not free to speak to any -- ANY -- member of the president's family -- not male OR FEMALE -- until spoken to. I know because I know someone who was in the Secret Service.

It's perfect common sense. If the president always all day had to speak back when spoken to in passing he couldn't hear himself think. Same for the First Lady. Or the kids. Or the grandma. Or West Wing work teams.

This Secret Service agent was not stupid or forgetful of rules. This was knee-jerk male harassment to breach her space and thoughts. It was like telling any woman nearby to "Smile!" under cover of some polite remark. It was bullshit. I don't blame her for telling the presumptuous asshole to fuck off.

Let's wake the fuck up and decide what trifling means.

Hillary is "difficult"?? A "nightmare"?? The New York Post and social media can fuck off for setting off this trifling to sell papers. If it gets campaign traction it will be a rallying cry to women.

I've never heard criticism of male candidates' past language from twenty years ago, have you? No. Because we don't have to be told that it should never enter into voters' considerations in any presidential race. Until a woman runs.

I'll say it again: anyone hired to protect any world leader should be told to fuck off if they speak out of turn.

Hillary's got nothing to prove. Is she "part of the Establishment" or isn't she?! If so, then the "proof" of "manners," "language style" or "bearing" is as irrelevant for her as it is for any male leader.

I can see now that if the Secret Service has revealed this to some newspaper, Hillary will need an all-woman Secret Service detail if she is to be respected and protected.

Secret Service are hired to be "invisible." They should stay that way.

http://nypost.com/2015/10/02/secret-service-agents-hillary-is-a-nightmare-to-work-with/

48 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Media Try to Make Hillary's Telling A Secret Service Agent To "Fuck Off" A Campaign Issue (Original Post) ancianita Feb 2016 OP
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2016 #1
this would be the FDR who died in the arms of his mistress dsc Feb 2016 #2
Hah...goddess forbid Hillary ever, ever do what FDR got away with. ancianita Feb 2016 #14
OMG - you want to talk "mistresses" when the Clintons are involved????? Vinca Feb 2016 #29
Hillary had mistresses I would love to see a link to that dsc Feb 2016 #31
The article is gossip and lies metroins Feb 2016 #6
Maybe not FDR, but I'm sure HST said this to his agents - and others - a time or two Empowerer Feb 2016 #9
You're obviously not getting the point. SS would not break the "no speak" rule to FDR. ancianita Feb 2016 #13
I wouldn't have been that nice. Kalidurga Feb 2016 #3
It's the New York Post. What do you expect? Bonobo Feb 2016 #4
Sexist bullshit thrives on talk shows and second tier media. Trying to head it off is a good thing. ancianita Feb 2016 #22
Why give this Fox News piece any exposure? metroins Feb 2016 #5
If it was posted before, please explain why media are dragging it forward again. Enough is enough. ancianita Feb 2016 #19
What media? metroins Feb 2016 #20
It IS old. But it's still circulating. Two Occupys and individuals keep it moving. Ugh. ancianita Feb 2016 #36
I consider it old, trash bin news nt metroins Feb 2016 #41
Better question ... Damn the media! ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2016 #33
I hear you. Trying only to drag forward my call on its bullshit premises before it gets traction. ancianita Feb 2016 #34
I'm a Sanders supporter, and this story sounds like grade-A abso-fucking-bullshit. Warren DeMontague Feb 2016 #7
Great Bernie priorities. I'm directing my ire at anyone who goes for bullshit that has to end NOW. ancianita Feb 2016 #16
"Secret Service are not free to speak..." Android3.14 Feb 2016 #8
You damned well know what I mean. There's a preliminary signal and no chit-chat noise. ancianita Feb 2016 #17
Actually, no. I do not know what you mean Android3.14 Feb 2016 #24
Reread my response. Presidents always know SS are nearby; they don't have to know where. ancianita Feb 2016 #26
Consider deleting this steaming pile of right wing shit cali Feb 2016 #10
I agree Android3.14 Feb 2016 #12
Translation: "Hillary isn't a good girl" Empowerer Feb 2016 #11
Doesn't seem like much of a stretch pipoman Feb 2016 #15
THAT's rich. "Little people" is her mindset? Don't add to the trifling mentality of right wing media ancianita Feb 2016 #18
Yes, it's why she cant beat a 73 year old Jewish socialist... pipoman Feb 2016 #21
she won Iowa. stonecutter357 Feb 2016 #27
lol pipoman Feb 2016 #28
so if a team wins a game 101 to 100 they didn't win dsc Feb 2016 #32
A presidential primary isn't a game and doesn't represent a win pipoman Feb 2016 #44
BS this is a made up thing treestar Feb 2016 #40
Actions speak louder... pipoman Feb 2016 #45
Ha, ha, ha, ha jehop61 Feb 2016 #23
Thank you. Let's put this media bullshit to rest. ancianita Feb 2016 #25
Next they'll dig up Vince foster gwheezie Feb 2016 #30
We're posting Murdoch gossip now? n/t mattclearing Feb 2016 #35
"Gossip" depends on the intended audience. To re-frame recurring shit flinging isn't itself gossip. ancianita Feb 2016 #37
I agree with your post. mattclearing Feb 2016 #42
As a Bernie supporter I don't care about this type of stuff. It smells like National Enquirer grade GoneFishin Feb 2016 #38
not credible anyway treestar Feb 2016 #39
This nonsense made the rounds here in the Fall mcar Feb 2016 #43
Yep! The SS would just think it was an OK to start hitting the strip clubs again! nt TheBlackAdder Feb 2016 #48
As fellow Sanders supporter, I mostly agree, but when Texas Gov. Perry said "Adios, Mofo," it was a Vote2016 Feb 2016 #46
George McGovern's final nail (1972) telling a jerk, "I've got a secret for you, kiss my ass!" nt TheBlackAdder Feb 2016 #47

Response to ancianita (Original post)

Vinca

(50,248 posts)
29. OMG - you want to talk "mistresses" when the Clintons are involved?????
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 09:44 AM
Feb 2016

I'd think twice about that. LOL.

metroins

(2,550 posts)
6. The article is gossip and lies
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 08:47 AM
Feb 2016

From the post and fox news.

Some guy is trying to sell books, so he makes stuff up.

Empowerer

(3,900 posts)
9. Maybe not FDR, but I'm sure HST said this to his agents - and others - a time or two
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 09:12 AM
Feb 2016

Much ado about nothing.

ancianita

(36,009 posts)
22. Sexist bullshit thrives on talk shows and second tier media. Trying to head it off is a good thing.
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 09:26 AM
Feb 2016

metroins

(2,550 posts)
5. Why give this Fox News piece any exposure?
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 08:46 AM
Feb 2016

It's in the NYP but it's written by a fox news writer and it's from 4 months ago.

This kind of rag mag garbage shouldn't be reposted.

ancianita

(36,009 posts)
36. It IS old. But it's still circulating. Two Occupys and individuals keep it moving. Ugh.
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 10:04 AM
Feb 2016

Sorry if DU considers this old news when it's on Facebook.

The only reason it keeps getting dragged out of the dustbin is sexism that is the father of trifling double standards and smeary ignorance pandering.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
33. Better question ... Damn the media! ...
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 09:54 AM
Feb 2016

If it was posted before, please explain why DUers are dragging it forward again? Enough is enough.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
7. I'm a Sanders supporter, and this story sounds like grade-A abso-fucking-bullshit.
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 08:55 AM
Feb 2016

And you're right. I suspect there are few people in power and under the sorts of pressure that those living and working in the White House experience, who wouldn't be in a shit mood from time to time. Non-story.

And the crap about how she "hated military uniforms and law enforcement" sounds exactly like the bullshit they used to throw out about crack pipes on the white house Christmas tree. SHE HATES TEH TROOPS! derp.




I'm far more concerned about her voting in the Senate for a Neo-Con war, than I am panicked that she may be secretly be some right wing caricature of a soldier-spitting 60s vietnam war protester.

The problem isn't that she secretly longs to burn American Flags, the problem is that she's done things like pander to those who would harm the first Amendment (truly, one of the things the flag represents) to outlaw flag burning.

And so on.




 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
8. "Secret Service are not free to speak..."
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 09:07 AM
Feb 2016

This is not a credible statement. In order to exercise their duties, a security detail must be able to communicate, and even initiate conversations, with the person they are protecting.

 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
24. Actually, no. I do not know what you mean
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 09:27 AM
Feb 2016

If you have any documentary proof which shows the secret service detail must never speak with the person they are protecting, please point it out. Otherwise, it seems pragmatic that an agent be able to interact on a limited social level simply to let the protectee know the presence and whereabouts of the people who are doing the protecting.

I think Hillary is woefully inappropriate to be POTUS, but too much of this OP lacks credibility.

ancianita

(36,009 posts)
26. Reread my response. Presidents always know SS are nearby; they don't have to know where.
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 09:33 AM
Feb 2016

Only the SS have to know where the president is. Speaking is rare and only in risky situations.

You're the one who's not credible here.

Empowerer

(3,900 posts)
11. Translation: "Hillary isn't a good girl"
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 09:14 AM
Feb 2016

How dare she speak to a man in a manner he thinks is disrespectful.

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
15. Doesn't seem like much of a stretch
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 09:19 AM
Feb 2016

To imagine Hillary isn't interested in the thoughts of the little people....

ancianita

(36,009 posts)
18. THAT's rich. "Little people" is her mindset? Don't add to the trifling mentality of right wing media
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 09:23 AM
Feb 2016
 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
28. lol
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 09:41 AM
Feb 2016

.3% isn't a win by anyone's standard

When wins are determined in tenths of percentage points it is a draw.

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
44. A presidential primary isn't a game and doesn't represent a win
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 12:52 PM
Feb 2016

It represents the very first play....49.6 to 49.3 is a tie

It is a joke for Hillary supporteres to be claiming a win in IA...desperation

jehop61

(1,735 posts)
23. Ha, ha, ha, ha
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 09:27 AM
Feb 2016

Looks like the NY Post has fallen for that internet story going around about Hillary's disrespect of the Secret Service. This is a very old story started back in 1993. Guess it's time to dust off all the old Bill and Hillary falsehoods and recirculate them. Posting them to DU just reiterates them. Was this really necessary to diss her here too? Psssst. Did you hear the one about how they were involved in a losing real estate deal in Arkansas?

ancianita

(36,009 posts)
37. "Gossip" depends on the intended audience. To re-frame recurring shit flinging isn't itself gossip.
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 10:18 AM
Feb 2016

To re-link the article comes off as doing that, so I'm sorry if I gave that impression of spreading it.

You're saying I should have not reacted so quickly to repeat exposures of this?

If there was already a long convo about this, I'm sorry to clog up the thread.

mattclearing

(10,091 posts)
42. I agree with your post.
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 11:07 AM
Feb 2016

I just hate that we have to discuss this. Even if it's true (and it *seriously* strains credibility), it's nobody's business and completely irrelevant. We already know way more about Hillary Clinton's personal life than we need to to evaluate her qualifications, and the level of scrutiny involved in the presidency is out of control; it would be beyond illegal in any other hiring situation.

I'm also partial to Bernie, but News Corp trots out this kind of inflated quasi-insider bullshit all the time, and I think it's as credible as it is relevant.

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
38. As a Bernie supporter I don't care about this type of stuff. It smells like National Enquirer grade
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 10:41 AM
Feb 2016

bullshit.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
39. not credible anyway
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 10:43 AM
Feb 2016

just doesn't seem like she's a person who uses that kind of language. Not that it would be unforgivable. Just that she does not seem like the type.

mcar

(42,287 posts)
43. This nonsense made the rounds here in the Fall
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 11:12 AM
Feb 2016

It is not news. If a man told the SS to f#ck off, no one would blink an eye.

 

Vote2016

(1,198 posts)
46. As fellow Sanders supporter, I mostly agree, but when Texas Gov. Perry said "Adios, Mofo," it was a
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 01:09 PM
Feb 2016

big issue.

That would seem to undercut the idea that this is sexism. If Obama was caught on a videotape telling a secret service officer to fuck off, do you really think it wouldn't be an issue? I'm not sure gender is a big part of this story.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Media Try to Make Hillary...