Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is supporting wars a feminist position? (Original Post) Fast Walker 52 Feb 2016 OP
War is terrible for any living thing. onecaliberal Feb 2016 #1
Can't think of one. Smarmie Doofus Feb 2016 #2
No. It is not. nt LWolf Feb 2016 #3
Is voting against the Brady Bill a progressive position? nt LexVegas Feb 2016 #4
good question-- probably not Fast Walker 52 Feb 2016 #6
Tell that to inner city youth and the victims of mass shootings. nt LexVegas Feb 2016 #9
Is Hillary's vote for the Iraq war defensible? Fast Walker 52 Feb 2016 #10
Hillary is a die-hard neocon gyroscope Feb 2016 #5
It depends on the war mythology Feb 2016 #7
If you had a better understanding of what a "feminist" is, you wouldn't need to ask. procon Feb 2016 #8
Hillary is drenched in blood. I think she's just truly a war hawk Arazi Feb 2016 #11
Yes. And I say that closeupready Feb 2016 #12
"Wars" is a vague term firebrand80 Feb 2016 #13
you are right... I was being overly broad Fast Walker 52 Feb 2016 #21
Hmmm... one_voice Feb 2016 #14
well, I was framing it in the context of feminism Fast Walker 52 Feb 2016 #16
Depends entirely on the war. Donald Ian Rankin Feb 2016 #15
why 20 years? Fast Walker 52 Feb 2016 #17
Kosovo. Donald Ian Rankin Feb 2016 #18
yes... thanks Fast Walker 52 Feb 2016 #20
Bell Hooks gives the best definition of "feminism" (Not the incorrect Sheryl Sandberg version). TheBlackAdder Feb 2016 #19
thanks Fast Walker 52 Feb 2016 #22
I Disagree With hooks About Feminism DrFunkenstein Feb 2016 #24
What you define was prevalent beginning in the early 1970s. TheBlackAdder Feb 2016 #25
If you're a despearte Noecom Oligarch...... why yes Ferd Berfel Feb 2016 #23
Let's ask Henry Kissinger! earthside Feb 2016 #26
 

Smarmie Doofus

(14,498 posts)
2. Can't think of one.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 11:24 AM
Feb 2016

I feel a little like Santorum re. Rubio.

Or Eisenhower re. candidate Nixon: give me a couple of weeks and i'll think of some important decision he's been involved in as veep.

>>So-- has the US had a military action that Hillary didn't support?>>>>>

 

Fast Walker 52

(7,723 posts)
10. Is Hillary's vote for the Iraq war defensible?
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 02:35 PM
Feb 2016

If so, please tell it to the million plus Iraqis who died in the 2003 war

 

gyroscope

(1,443 posts)
5. Hillary is a die-hard neocon
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 11:36 AM
Feb 2016

who never saw a war she didn't like and sings the praises of Henry Kissinger.

if you want to see more war and escalation of violence in the ME and elsewhere vote for Hillary Clinton.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
7. It depends on the war
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 12:44 PM
Feb 2016

Some wars are more just than others.

Doing nothing during the Rwandan genocide led to lots of women suffering unspeakable violence.

It's simplistic to say if we don't get involved things that bad things won't happen. While a lot of people don't want to admit it, our own military is really restrained compared to not only previous super powers, but even our own past.

procon

(15,805 posts)
8. If you had a better understanding of what a "feminist" is, you wouldn't need to ask.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 12:48 PM
Feb 2016

Women are not monolithic in their interests or their choices. I believe this also applies to other women who are not "feminists", as well as -- perhaps -- even some men.

"Feminists" are free to engage in whatever they choose, including wars and the military, and they do it quite successfully. If your critique is simply trying to make an assertion that you oppose war, great! But don't omit chastising the vast majority of men (from both parties) who profess their deep and abiding love affair with all things military and warlike, including all those gun loving men who find novel excuses to justify the ever increasing death toll of innocents.

Arazi

(6,829 posts)
11. Hillary is drenched in blood. I think she's just truly a war hawk
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 02:38 PM
Feb 2016

regardless of her position on women's issues because war is good for Wall St and the MIC

It's a contradiction for sure to be pro-war that basically destroys people's lives

firebrand80

(2,760 posts)
13. "Wars" is a vague term
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 02:40 PM
Feb 2016

Are we talking Bush-style preemptive adventurism or preventing genocide against a powerless minority?

 

Fast Walker 52

(7,723 posts)
21. you are right... I was being overly broad
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 04:04 PM
Feb 2016

Mostly I was thinking about Iraq and Libya, and the Israel bombings of Gaza.

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
14. Hmmm...
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 02:43 PM
Feb 2016

*sigh*

Is supporting wars a HUMANIST position.

It seems like war is about as bad FOR ANY LIVING CREATURE on this green earth.

Yeah, that's better.

You've could have asked that question about Hillary without making it about gender.

I'm not going to discuss my views on wars with someone that boiled it down to body parts.


Donald Ian Rankin

(13,598 posts)
15. Depends entirely on the war.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 02:49 PM
Feb 2016

It's striking how many people's memories of US military history extend back 15 years but not 20.

Donald Ian Rankin

(13,598 posts)
18. Kosovo.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 02:54 PM
Feb 2016

A war of choice that the US was right to fight, prevented large-scale ethnic cleansing and atrocities, and left the Balkans much healthier and more stable.

One might also say 25 to bring in the Rwandan genocide - an occasion when *not* resorting to military force was clearly the wrong decision.

 

Fast Walker 52

(7,723 posts)
20. yes... thanks
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 04:03 PM
Feb 2016

I know there was some controversy about the Kosovo bombing, but the country seems to have done well since then.

The 2011 Libya bombing was also supposed to prevent ethnic cleansing, but that didn't wok out well at all.

TheBlackAdder

(28,179 posts)
19. Bell Hooks gives the best definition of "feminism" (Not the incorrect Sheryl Sandberg version).
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 03:01 PM
Feb 2016

.



It has nothing to do with war.


"Feminism is a movement to end sexism, sexist exploitation and oppression."


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_hooks


====


Check out her book on this subject, "Feminism Is for Everybody: Passionate Politics"



http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/feminism-is-for-everybody-bell-hooks/1111890589


====


Now, onto her completely destroying Sheryl Sandberg's "Lean In"...


http://www.thefeministwire.com/2013/10/17973/



.

 

Fast Walker 52

(7,723 posts)
22. thanks
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 04:08 PM
Feb 2016

I was listening to a discussion on a podcast and they were arguing that feminism shouldn't just be about reproductive rights but also about economic justice and being anti-war.

I wouldn't say war has nothing to do with feminism at all, but certainly the connection is somewhat tenuous.

DrFunkenstein

(8,745 posts)
24. I Disagree With hooks About Feminism
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 04:14 PM
Feb 2016

It is true that 2nd wave feminism had a lot on its hands ending sexism. Sexism still exists, let's not pretend otherwise, but feminism has evolved into something larger and much more positive. It is now as much about embracing the power of women as it is about ending the things that hold them back.

As such, we have moved beyond merely trying to break the glass ceiling on the White House. That is a noble cause, and we all want it, but it is far from the highest aim of a movement for respecting and empowering women all over the country and the world.

TheBlackAdder

(28,179 posts)
25. What you define was prevalent beginning in the early 1970s.
Mon Feb 8, 2016, 04:33 PM
Feb 2016

.



When the barriers are removed, there is an equal playing field for all.

Feminism DOES NOT relate to just women, but encompasses complete sexual equality, of all sexes and orientations.


.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Is supporting wars a femi...